A Comparison of Metallic Staples Versus Absorbable Staples After a Cesarean Section (C-Section)
Closure of Pfannenstiel Skin Incisions After Cesarean Delivery: A Comparison of Metallic Staples Versus Absorbable Staples
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare post operative pain, cost effectiveness, speed of closure and patient satisfaction of Pfannenstiel incisions closed with metallic staples versus absorbable staples (Insorb) after Cesarean Delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jul 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 12, 2014
CompletedOctober 9, 2018
May 1, 2014
10 months
September 2, 2010
March 13, 2014
September 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Post Operative Pain
Post operative pain at post operative day #1 will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale has a minimum score of 0 representing no pain and a maximum score of 10 representing the worst possible pain.
1 Year
Post Operative Pain (3 Days Post-op)
Post operative pain at the time of discharge will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale has a minimum score of 0 representing no pain and a maximum score of 10 representing the worst possible pain.
1 Year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient Satisfaction
This will be assessed 3 day after the patient's C-section before they are discharged from the hospital
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction will be assessed 6 weeks later at their post-op visit
Study Arms (2)
Control Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis group will receive the standard metallic staples to close their incision.
Case Group
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive the Insorb absorbable staples to close their incision.
Interventions
Patients will be randomized to receive either the standard metallic staples or the Insorb absorbable staples
Patients will be randomized to receive either standard metallic staples or Insorb absorbable staples
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Obstetric service patients (receiving prenatal care from the Faculty Medical Center)
- Women greater than 18 years old
- Singleton gestation
- Cesarean Section performed by Pfannenstiel skin incision
You may not qualify if:
- History of drug or alcohol abuse
- Contraindication to post operative NSAID's or Narcotics
- Emergent Cesarean Deliveries
- Less then 18 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- TriHealth Inc.lead
Study Sites (1)
Good Samaritan Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220, United States
Related Publications (1)
Feese CA, Johnson S, Jones E, Lambers DS. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;209(6):556.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
PMID: 23921089RESULT
Limitations and Caveats
Low response rate to patient surveys at discharge and at 6 weeks postpartum.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Donna Lambers, MD
- Organization
- TriHealth
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2010
First Posted
September 10, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 9, 2018
Results First Posted
June 12, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05