Endovenous Ablation With and Without Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam Treatment for Patients With Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence and Visible Varicosities
017
A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded Study of Endovenous Thermal Ablation With or Without Varisolve™ Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) Treatment for Patients With Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence and Visible Varicosities
1 other identifier
interventional
117
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Varicose veins are enlarged, noticeably bulging veins, which commonly occur in the legs and may cause discomfort. In this study, patients with varicose veins in the legs will be participating. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two different doses of an investigational drug, Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) compared to vehicle (inactive solution) when used following an approved heat treatment in subjects with varicose veins.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2010
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 15, 2014
CompletedApril 21, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.5 years
September 8, 2010
February 7, 2014
April 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Independent Photography Review (IPR-V3 Score)
The Independent Photography Review - Visible Varicose Veins (IPR-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used to assess the appearance of a patient's visible varicose veins. At screening, the site clinician was instructed to review the appearance of the patient's varicose veins in the medial section of each leg (a 'live' assessment), then select an IPR-V3 score (i.e., none=0, mild, moderate, severe or very severe=4) that best represented the appearance of the patient's varicose veins. This assessment took into account the attributes caliber, dilatation, tortuosity, and extent and number of varicosities, and was used to determine patient eligibility. The site clinician used a set of reference photographs (2 example photographs for each score on the scale) to assist with assigning a score to the appearance of the patient's visible varicose veins.
IPR-V3 measured at baseline and then at 8 weeks
Absolute Change From Baseline in PA-V3 Score
The Patient Self-assessment of Visible Varicose Veins (PA-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used by patients to evaluate the appearance of their visible varicose veins. On this paper questionnaire, the instructions included a diagram of the medial view of a leg with the area between the ankle and the groin circled. The patient was instructed to choose 1 of 5 response options that best described the appearance of the visible varicose veins of the leg that was treated in the study. The patient was instructed not to consider the appearance of the leg outside the circled area or of any spider veins. Possible responses ranged from "Not at all noticeable" (a score of 0) to "Extremely noticeable" (a score of 4)
PA-V3 measured at baseline and then at 8 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable microfoam 0.125%
EXPERIMENTALEndovenous ablation followed by an injection of polidocanol injectable microfoam 0.125% to target vein
Endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable micrfoam, 1.0%
EXPERIMENTALEndovenous ablation followed by injection of polidocanol injectable microfoam, 1.0% to the target vein
endovenous ablation+vehicle (placebo)
ACTIVE COMPARATORendovenous ablation followed by injection of vehicle (placebo) to target vein
Interventions
All components except API
endovenous ablation to target vein, followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 1.0%
Endovenous ablation to target vein followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Incompetence of SFJ
- Patients who are candidates for ETA \[laser or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)\]
- Symptomatic varicose veins
- Visible varicose veins
- Ability to comprehend and sign an informed consent and complete study questionnaires in English
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who only have telangiectatic or reticular veins (Clinical Finding C1, as assessed by CEAP Classification of Venous Disorders)
- Patients who have active ulceration on the leg to be treated (Clinical Finding C6, as assessed by CEAP Classification of Venous Disorders)
- Leg obesity impairing the ability to access the vein to be treated and/or to apply post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings
- Ultrasonographic or other evidence of current or previous deep vein thrombosis or occlusion
- Deep venous reflux unless clinically insignificant in comparison to superficial reflux
- Peripheral arterial disease precluding the wearing of post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings
- Reduced mobility
- History of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or stroke, including evidence of prior DVT on duplex ultrasound
- Major surgery, prolonged hospitalization or pregnancy within 3 months of screening
- Major co-existing disease (e.g. malignancy; pulmonary disease; renal or hepatic insufficiency; serious skin disease/condition that may compromise the ability of the patient to comply with the compression protocol, etc.)
- Known allergic response to polidocanol or heparin, including history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and/or multiple allergic reactions
- Current alcohol or drug abuse
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Unknown Facility
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255, United States
Unknown Facility
Bradenton, Florida, 34209, United States
Unknown Facility
Oak Brook, Illinois, 60523, United States
Unknown Facility
North Tonawanda, New York, 14120, United States
Unknown Facility
Stony Brook, New York, 11974, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Unknown Facility
Kirkland, Washington, 98034, United States
Related Publications (1)
Vasquez M, Gasparis AP; Varithena(R) 017 Investigator Group. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of endovenous thermal ablation with or without polidocanol endovenous microfoam treatment in patients with great saphenous vein incompetence and visible varicosities. Phlebology. 2017 May;32(4):272-281. doi: 10.1177/0268355516637300. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
PMID: 26957489DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- David Wright MB FRCS
- Organization
- BTG International Inc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2010
First Posted
September 9, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 21, 2021
Results First Posted
September 15, 2014
Record last verified: 2021-04