Study Stopped
Investigator decisions based on slow enrollment.
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
87
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) cholecystectomy to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), focusing on patient-reported outcomes and cost.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedApril 30, 2012
August 1, 2011
1.9 years
September 2, 2010
April 27, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cost associated with performance of the procedure and post-operative care until discharge
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain scale reported by patient at discharge, 24 and 48 hours
24 hours and 48 hours
Amount of pain medicine required during 48 hours after surgery
48 hours
Major and minor gastrointestinal surgical complications, including conversion
4 weeks
Quality of Life
2 weeks and 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecsytectomy (SILS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTraditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TLC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient recommended to undergo cholecystectomy
- Patient age 18-80
- Patient competent to give his/her own informed consent
- Patient speaks English without the need for an interpreter
You may not qualify if:
- Additional procedures planned during same surgery
- Patient deemed inappropriate for TLC or SILS cholecystectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
Related Publications (3)
Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Launched at St. Louis University Hospital. www.news-medical.net. April, 2009
BACKGROUNDChamberlain RS, Sakpal SV. A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Sep;13(9):1733-40. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0902-y. Epub 2009 May 2.
PMID: 19412642BACKGROUNDHodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross SB, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Feb;13(2):188-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0735-0. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
PMID: 19031097BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kimberly M Brown, BS, MD
St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2010
First Posted
September 6, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2011-08