NCT01194674

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of microplasmin as a treatment for uveitic macular edema.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 2, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2011

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 14, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

July 31, 2018

Status Verified

July 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

September 2, 2010

Results QC Date

July 10, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 3, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

MicroplasminMacular EdemaUveitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Number of Adverse Events

    24 weeks

  • Number of Severe Adverse Events

    24 weeks

  • Number of Ocular Adverse Events

    The number of eye-related adverse events was calculated.

    24 weeks

  • Number of Non-ocular Adverse Events

    The number of adverse events that were not eye-related was calculated.

    24 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in Central Macular Thickness, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), at 4 Weeks vs. Baseline

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Number of Participants Achieving Macular or Complete Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVT) at 4 Weeks

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at 4 Weeks vs. Baseline

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Change in ETDRS Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at 12 Weeks vs. Baseline

    Baseline and 12 Weeks

  • Change in Retino-vascular Leakage, as Seen on Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 4 Weeks vs. Baseline

    Baseline and 4 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Microplasmin

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Microplasmin

Interventions

Participants received an intravitreal injection of 125 µg in 100 µL of microplasmin at baseline.

Microplasmin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant must be 18 years of age or older.
  • Participant must understand and sign the protocol's informed consent document.
  • Participant has a diagnosis of uveitic macular edema that requires treatment in at least one eye (the study eye) and the uveitis in the study eye is deemed clinically quiet by the investigator.
  • Participant has no evidence of macular or complete PVD in the study eye by B-scan ultrasound and OCT.
  • Participant has visual acuity of 20/400 or better in the study eye.
  • Participant has a central macular thickness ≥ 270 microns in the study eye and loss of the normal foveal contour.
  • Participant does not have significant cataract or media opacity in the study eye that makes posterior segment visualization difficult as determined by investigator.
  • Female participants of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breast-feeding and must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and throughout the study.
  • Both female participants of childbearing potential and male participants able to father a child must agree to practice two effective methods of birth control for six months following administration of study medication. Acceptable methods of birth control for this study include hormonal contraception (birth control pills, injected hormones, dermal patch or vaginal ring), intrauterine device, barrier methods (diaphragm, condom) with spermicide or surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, tubal ligation or vasectomy). Participants with a hysterectomy or vasectomy (or have a partner with a hysterectomy or vasectomy) are exempt from using two methods of birth control.
  • Participant is willing to comply with the study procedures and return for all study visits.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participant has uncontrolled glaucoma, defined as intraocular pressure \>30 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication, in the study eye.
  • Participant has lattice degeneration of the retina in the study eye deemed to be high risk by the investigator.
  • Participant has untreated retinal holes or tears, or a macular hole in the study eye.
  • Participant has a significant active ocular infection in the study eye.
  • Participant had intraocular surgery within the past 90 days or anticipates elective intraocular surgery in the study eye.
  • Participant had an injection of bevacizumab or ranibizumab within the past four weeks in the study eye.
  • Participant had an injection of triamcinolone within the past six weeks in the study eye.
  • Participant has a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status that would pose a significant hazard if investigational therapy was started).
  • Participant has known anaphylaxis to sodium fluoride, or has urticaria, angioedema or an anaphylactoid response to sodium fluorescein dye that cannot be safely pre-medicated with an antihistamine and/or prednisone.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Gritz DC, Wong IG. Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in Northern California; the Northern California Epidemiology of Uveitis Study. Ophthalmology. 2004 Mar;111(3):491-500; discussion 500. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.014.

    PMID: 15019324BACKGROUND
  • Djalilian AR, Nussenblatt RB. Immunosuppression in uveitis. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002 Sep;15(3):395-404, viii. doi: 10.1016/s0896-1549(02)00036-6.

    PMID: 12434489BACKGROUND
  • Whitcup SM, Hikita N, Shirao M, Miyasaka M, Tamatani T, Mochizuki M, Nussenblatt RB, Chan CC. Monoclonal antibodies against CD54 (ICAM-1) and CD11a (LFA-1) prevent and inhibit endotoxin-induced uveitis. Exp Eye Res. 1995 Jun;60(6):597-601. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(05)80001-6.

    PMID: 7641842BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

UveitisMacular Edema

Interventions

microplasmin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uveal DiseasesEye DiseasesMacular DegenerationRetinal DegenerationRetinal Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

The study was terminated early due to lack of enrollment.

Results Point of Contact

Title
H. Nida Sen, Principal Investigator, National Eye Institute
Organization
National Institutes of Health

Study Officials

  • Hatice Nida Sen, MD, MHSc

    National Institutes of Health (NIH)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
NIH
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, NEI

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2010

First Posted

September 3, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 31, 2018

Results First Posted

August 14, 2012

Record last verified: 2018-07

Locations