Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Different Administration Routes With SLITonePLUS Birch
A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Clinical Pilot Study to Compare the Pharmacodynamic Efficacy and Tolerability of the Sublingual and the Vestibular Administration Route for SLITonePLUS® Birch
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Multicentre Phase II trial, comparing two different administration routes of SLITonePLUS Birch in regard to pharmacodynamic efficacy and tolerability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedFebruary 8, 2013
February 1, 2013
1 year
August 27, 2010
February 7, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pharmacodynamic efficacy of two different administration routes of SLITonePLUS Birch
specific antibody determination
after 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 weeks of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the two administration routes with regard to safety aspects
36 weeks
Study Arms (2)
sublingual administration
ACTIVE COMPARATORoral immunotherapy with drops applied once daily by single dose containers (200 STU per dose)
vestibular administration
ACTIVE COMPARATORoral immunotherapy with drops applied by single dose containers (200 STU per dose)
Interventions
orally applied specific immunotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A history of Birch pollen allergy
- Positive skin prick test to birch
- Positive specific IgE to birch
You may not qualify if:
- Uncontrolled or severe asthma (FEV1\<70% of predicted value in spite of adequate pharmacologic treatment)
- Previous treatment by immunotherapy with birch or a cross-reactingtree pollen allergen within the previous 5 years
- Concomitant SLIT with any allergen
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ALK-Abelló A/Slead
Study Sites (1)
Universitätsklinik Bonn, Dermatology
Bonn, D-53127, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Bieber, MD, PhD
Universitäsklinik Bonn, Dermatology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2010
First Posted
August 30, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-02