NCT01190917

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different treatment approaches to social skills groups for high-functioning children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This project will examine changes in both behavior and the brain following treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 20, 2010

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2010

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

October 2, 2012

Status Verified

October 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

August 20, 2010

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

AutismAutism Spectrum DisorderDisorderAutisticAsperger Syndromesocial skills groupbehavioral interventionImaging, Magnetic ResonancefMRIFunctional MRIMRI, FunctionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingFunctional

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2* (DANVA2)

    Assesses emotion recognition from facial expression, tone of voice, and posture. This instrument allows for the assessment of basic emotions conveyed by both adult and child models at high and low intensity. Nowicki and Carton \[50\] have shown that the DANVA2 has acceptable internal consistency for school age children and good test-retest reliability.

    Week 0

  • Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2* (DANVA2)

    Assesses emotion recognition from facial expression, tone of voice, and posture. This instrument allows for the assessment of basic emotions conveyed by both adult and child models at high and low intensity. Nowicki and Carton \[50\] have shown that the DANVA2 has acceptable internal consistency for school age children and good test-retest reliability.

    Week 12

  • Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2* (DANVA2)

    Assesses emotion recognition from facial expression, tone of voice, and posture. This instrument allows for the assessment of basic emotions conveyed by both adult and child models at high and low intensity. Nowicki and Carton \[50\] have shown that the DANVA2 has acceptable internal consistency for school age children and good test-retest reliability.

    Week 24

  • Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task - Child Version

    The computerized children's version of the Eyes test is a reduced battery of 28-items measuring an individual's ability to interpret intentions and 'mentalizing' abilities, a hallmark social cognitive deficit in ASD. The adult RMET has shown sensitivity to change in clinical trials and the child version showed promising results in our preliminary analyses (see Preliminary Studies).

    Week 0

  • Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task - Child Version

    The computerized children's version of the Eyes test is a reduced battery of 28-items measuring an individual's ability to interpret intentions and 'mentalizing' abilities, a hallmark social cognitive deficit in ASD. The adult RMET has shown sensitivity to change in clinical trials and the child version showed promising results in our preliminary analyses (see Preliminary Studies).

    Week 12

  • Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task - Child Version

    The computerized children's version of the Eyes test is a reduced battery of 28-items measuring an individual's ability to interpret intentions and 'mentalizing' abilities, a hallmark social cognitive deficit in ASD. The adult RMET has shown sensitivity to change in clinical trials and the child version showed promising results in our preliminary analyses (see Preliminary Studies).

    Week 24

  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

    We previously developed two activation tasks that tap different aspects of social cognition: 1) Interpreting Communicative Intent: Participants will view cartoon drawings of children while listening to short vignettes ending with a potentially ironic remark. Participants decide whether the speaker really meant what s/he said. 2) Affect and eye contact: Participants will view full-face pictures of people displaying happy, angry, fearful, or neutral affect. For each emotion, half of the faces show a direct gaze and half show a gaze aversion.

    Week 0

  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

    We previously developed two activation tasks that tap different aspects of social cognition: 1) Interpreting Communicative Intent: Participants will view cartoon drawings of children while listening to short vignettes ending with a potentially ironic remark. Participants decide whether the speaker really meant what s/he said. 2) Affect and eye contact: Participants will view full-face pictures of people displaying happy, angry, fearful, or neutral affect. For each emotion, half of the faces show a direct gaze and half show a gaze aversion.

    Week 12

  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

    We previously developed two activation tasks that tap different aspects of social cognition: 1) Interpreting Communicative Intent: Participants will view cartoon drawings of children while listening to short vignettes ending with a potentially ironic remark. Participants decide whether the speaker really meant what s/he said. 2) Affect and eye contact: Participants will view full-face pictures of people displaying happy, angry, fearful, or neutral affect. For each emotion, half of the faces show a direct gaze and half show a gaze aversion.

    Week 24

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)

    Week 0

  • Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)

    Week 12

  • Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)

    Week 24

  • Strange Stories Task

    Week 0

  • Strange Stories Task

    Week 12

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

Social Play Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Play Therapy

Interventions

The CBT social skills curriculum is manualized and anchored in CBT strategies, such as problem identification, affective education, performance feedback, and weekly homework activities to facilitate generalization. The curriculum is a compilation of lessons targeting key social deficits in children with ASD, such as nonverbal communication, emotion recognition, and theory of mind. Structured teaching includes defining skills, breaking them down into simple, concrete steps, modeling the skill through role-play, and introducing a game or activity to practice the target skill. The approach to the parent group will be psychoeducational with a focus on reviewing target skills, rationale for teaching target skills, homework, progress or obstacles, and identifying strategies to promote generalization. Parent information handouts will be provided.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group
Play TherapyBEHAVIORAL

The social play group is manualized, led by a trained clinician and support staff, follows a specific routine, and contains a parent group component. Group leaders will follow participants' interests and suggestions for games. Group leaders utilize strategies such as reflective functioning statements on the child's behaviors to build emotion-focused play skills. The therapeutic setting incorporates play designed to encourage emotion-focused play including make-believe (dolls, houses), sensory (e.g. play-doh), and cooperative play (e.g. board games) toys. The approach to the parent group will be supportive rather than psychoeducational. Parents will set the agenda for discussion, facilitated by the group leader.

Social Play Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 11 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • to 11 years of age
  • Meets criteria for ASD according to psychiatric interview (DSM-IV), the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic, and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised
  • Verbal IQ ≥ 70, as measured by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition or Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence

You may not qualify if:

  • History of psychiatric or neurological disorders other than ASD (e.g., schizophrenia, depression, seizure disorder)
  • Within 30 days prior to the initial evaluation, beginning any new psychotropic medication or other therapeutic intervention (e.g., behavior, speech, physical/occupational, cognitive, nutritional therapy) that would confound the evaluation of the social skills groups
  • Gross structural abnormality present in the brain (e.g., aneurysm)
  • History of head trauma or loss of consciousness
  • For any reason the child or parents appear unable to participate in study procedures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mount Sinai School of Medicine - Seaver Autism Center

New York, New York, 10029, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Soorya LV, Siper PM, Beck T, Soffes S, Halpern D, Gorenstein M, Kolevzon A, Buxbaum J, Wang AT. Randomized comparative trial of a social cognitive skills group for children with autism spectrum disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;54(3):208-216.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Autistic DisorderAutism Spectrum DisorderDiseaseAsperger Syndrome

Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPlay Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Child Development Disorders, PervasiveNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental DisordersPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesSensory Art TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Ting Wang, Ph.D.

    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Latha Soorya, Ph.D.

    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2010

First Posted

August 30, 2010

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion

September 1, 2012

Study Completion

September 1, 2012

Last Updated

October 2, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-10

Locations