Warming Efficiency of Warm Compresses Versus BLEPHASTEAM® in Eyelid Therapy
Phase I, Prospective, Comparative Study, Investigator Masked , Monocentric Measuring Warming Efficiency and Safety of Blephasteam® Versus Warm Compresses in Eyelid Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The eyelid warming device is designed to relieve the symptoms of dysfunction of the glands in the eyelids Phase I, prospective, comparative study, investigator masked , monocentric Objectives are To assess and compare the warming and moisture of Blephasteam® device versus the warming and moisture of warm and moist compresses. To assess and compare safety on the ocular surface after 10 minutes of Blephasteam® application versus after 10 minutes of warm and moist compresses application
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Sep 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedDecember 6, 2010
December 1, 2010
2 months
August 25, 2010
December 3, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Temperature measurements
The temperature in the chamber of the goggles for Blephasteam device, or between the lid and the compresses for the moist and warm compress, will be evaluated in 10 consecutive measurements over a period of 10 minutes with a micro sensor at the lower lid margin of one randomly selected eye of 10 randomly selected subjects
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Humidity measurements
Study Arms (2)
Blephasteam Arm
EXPERIMENTALwarm and moist compresses arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female aged from 18 to 80 years old.
- Healthy volunteers.
- For any contact lens wearers, they must be wearing hydrogel contact lenses (worn at least 3 times per week)
- Normal ocular examination in both eyes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Optometry & Vision Sciences
Cardiff, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heiko PULT, Doctor
Cardiff University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2010
First Posted
August 27, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 6, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-12