Fractional Laser and Ultrasound for Striae Distensae
Comparison of Fractional Photothermolysis Alone Versus Fractional Photothermolysis Plus Intense Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Striae Distensae: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This was a prospective randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound when used in conjunction with 1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser versus 1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser alone for treatment of striae distensae(stretch marks). Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side and the contralateral side received micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side. The primary outcome measure by two dermatologists blindly compared the two areas of striae distensae on each side from live subjects using a questionnaire and quartile rating scale on the final follow-up visit. This study was a pilot study designed to determine the feasibility of these procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 3, 2014
CompletedDecember 3, 2021
December 1, 2021
10 months
August 19, 2010
September 3, 2013
December 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Live-rater by Two Blinded Dermatologists
The primary outcome was a blinded rating of the treatment area (Fractional Laser vs. Fractional Laser plus Intense Focused Ultrasound) with the best cosmetic appearance. Two dermatologists blindly evaluated the treated and control areas of each side from live subjects on the final follow up visit (week 10). This was reported as percentages of participants for whom "1550-nm Erbium-doped Fractionated Laser" or "Micro-focused Ultrasound and 1550nm-fractionated Laser" resulted in the "best cosmetic appearance".
week 10
Study Arms (2)
1550-nm erbium-doped fractionated laser
ACTIVE COMPARATORCombination treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATOR"micro-focused ultrasound" and "1550nm-fractionated laser"
Interventions
The contralateral side received the combination of micro-focused ultrasound treatment and 1550nm-fractionated laser alternatively every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments with site-match control area of baseline striae on each side.
Each side of thigh (or abdomen) was randomized to receive 1550nm-fractionated laser treatment every 2 weeks for a total of 4 treatments on one side.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-60 years old male and female subjects with striae distensae on both thighs or both sides of the abdomen.
- Subjects are in good health.
- Subjects are willing, have the ability to understand and provide informed consent, and are able to communicate with the investigator.
- Subjects should be within a 20 lb range of their starting weight during in the study period.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating
- Subjects who are unable to understand the protocol or give informed consent.
- Subjects currently under treatment with corticosteroids for any medical problems or subjects who discontinued treatment less than 2 months prior to consent.
- Subjects who have had medical e.g usage of oral or topical retinoids, laser or surgical treatment for striae distensae within the last year.
- Subjects who have active skin disease or skin infection in the treatment area.
- Subjects who are allergic to lidocaine or prilocaine.
- Subjects who have a history of abnormal scarring.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University Department of Dermatology
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Murad Alam
- Organization
- Northwestern University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Murad Alam, MD
Northwestern University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Dermatology, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery and Surgery-Organ Transplantation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2010
First Posted
August 23, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 3, 2021
Results First Posted
February 3, 2014
Record last verified: 2021-12