NCT01179893

Brief Summary

Immunomodulation is effective in treating patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), but prior studies have not adequately defined if plasma exchange (PLEX) in superior to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. This study aimed to determine if PLEX was superior to IVIG in the treatment of patients with myasthenia gravis. Patients with MG requiring immunomodulation are randomized to IVIG or PLEX and treated with a full course of immunomodulation. The quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) will be evaluated as the primary efficacy parameter at day 14 to determine if PLEX is superior to IVIG.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
87

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2007

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2007

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 9, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 11, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2010

Status Verified

August 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

August 9, 2010

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

Myasthenia GravisIVIGPLEX

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) from baseline to day 14 after treatment

    QMGS is a validated clinical measure of myasthenia gravis ranging from 0 points (no myasthenic weakness) to a maximum of 39 points, with a defined change of 3.4 units required for clinical significance.

    QMGS at day 14, and patients followed to day 60

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • QMGS Score change at days 21 and 28 from start of treatment.

    28 days

  • Post intervention status

    Day 14, 21 and 28

  • Single fiber electromyography: jitter, percent abnormal pair, percent blocking

    Days 14 and 28 compared to baseline

  • Repetitive Nerve stimulation studies

    Days 14 and 28

  • Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody titers

    Day 28 (if positive at baseline)

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

IVIG

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intravenous Immunoglobulin, 2G/Kg, infused over 2 days in the Medical Day Unit of the University Health Network

Biological: IVIG

PLEX

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received one plasma volume plasma exchanges with 5% albumin replacement fluid. Five plasma exchange procedures occurred every second day with breaks over the weekend allowed. Patients treated in the apheresis units at the University Health Network.

Procedure: PLEX

Interventions

IVIGBIOLOGICAL

Intravenous immunoglobulin

IVIG
PLEXPROCEDURE

Plasma exchange: removal of pathogenic antibodies and constituents and replacement with albumin.

PLEX

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \>18 years old
  • diagnosis of moderate-severe MG (defined as a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score QMGS \>10.5)
  • worsening weakness requiring a change in therapy judged by a neuromuscular expert

You may not qualify if:

  • Worsening weakness secondary to concurrent medications (e.g. Aminoglycosides)
  • Worsening weakness secondary to infection
  • Change in corticosteroid dosage in the 2 weeks prior to screening
  • Other disorders causing weakness or fatigue
  • Known absolute IgA deficiency (risk of anaphylactic reaction to IVIG)
  • History of anaphylaxis or severe systemic response to IVIG or albumin
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Active renal failure precluding volume of IVIG (risk of volume overload with IVIG) as judged by the investigators
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease precluding IVIG volume as judged by the investigators
  • Known hyperviscosity or hypercoaguable state (risk of stroke with IVIG)
  • Known coagulopathy with bleeding
  • On another current study medication or protocol within 4 weeks of screening
  • Patients with known refractory status to either IVIG or PLEX
  • Poorly controlled or severe hypertension (exacerbation by IVIG)
  • Patient refuses treatment with either IVIG or PLEX
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Zinman L, Ng E, Bril V. IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2007 Mar 13;68(11):837-41. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000256698.69121.45.

    PMID: 17353471BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myasthenia Gravis

Interventions

Immunoglobulins, Intravenous

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Paraneoplastic Syndromes, Nervous SystemNervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsParaneoplastic SyndromesAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuromuscular Junction DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin IsotypesAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Study Officials

  • Vera Bril, BSc, MD, FRCPC

    University Health Network, Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David Barth, MD

    University Heatlh Network

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2010

First Posted

August 11, 2010

Study Start

March 1, 2007

Primary Completion

July 1, 2010

Study Completion

July 1, 2010

Last Updated

August 11, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-08

Locations