Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Plasma Exchange in Myasthenia Gravis
A Randomized Trial of Plasma Exchange vs. IVIG in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis
1 other identifier
interventional
87
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Immunomodulation is effective in treating patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), but prior studies have not adequately defined if plasma exchange (PLEX) in superior to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. This study aimed to determine if PLEX was superior to IVIG in the treatment of patients with myasthenia gravis. Patients with MG requiring immunomodulation are randomized to IVIG or PLEX and treated with a full course of immunomodulation. The quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) will be evaluated as the primary efficacy parameter at day 14 to determine if PLEX is superior to IVIG.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Mar 2007
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2010
CompletedAugust 11, 2010
August 1, 2010
3.3 years
August 9, 2010
August 9, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) from baseline to day 14 after treatment
QMGS is a validated clinical measure of myasthenia gravis ranging from 0 points (no myasthenic weakness) to a maximum of 39 points, with a defined change of 3.4 units required for clinical significance.
QMGS at day 14, and patients followed to day 60
Secondary Outcomes (9)
QMGS Score change at days 21 and 28 from start of treatment.
28 days
Post intervention status
Day 14, 21 and 28
Single fiber electromyography: jitter, percent abnormal pair, percent blocking
Days 14 and 28 compared to baseline
Repetitive Nerve stimulation studies
Days 14 and 28
Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody titers
Day 28 (if positive at baseline)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
IVIG
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravenous Immunoglobulin, 2G/Kg, infused over 2 days in the Medical Day Unit of the University Health Network
PLEX
EXPERIMENTALPatients received one plasma volume plasma exchanges with 5% albumin replacement fluid. Five plasma exchange procedures occurred every second day with breaks over the weekend allowed. Patients treated in the apheresis units at the University Health Network.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \>18 years old
- diagnosis of moderate-severe MG (defined as a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score QMGS \>10.5)
- worsening weakness requiring a change in therapy judged by a neuromuscular expert
You may not qualify if:
- Worsening weakness secondary to concurrent medications (e.g. Aminoglycosides)
- Worsening weakness secondary to infection
- Change in corticosteroid dosage in the 2 weeks prior to screening
- Other disorders causing weakness or fatigue
- Known absolute IgA deficiency (risk of anaphylactic reaction to IVIG)
- History of anaphylaxis or severe systemic response to IVIG or albumin
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Active renal failure precluding volume of IVIG (risk of volume overload with IVIG) as judged by the investigators
- Clinically significant cardiac disease precluding IVIG volume as judged by the investigators
- Known hyperviscosity or hypercoaguable state (risk of stroke with IVIG)
- Known coagulopathy with bleeding
- On another current study medication or protocol within 4 weeks of screening
- Patients with known refractory status to either IVIG or PLEX
- Poorly controlled or severe hypertension (exacerbation by IVIG)
- Patient refuses treatment with either IVIG or PLEX
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Health Network, Torontolead
- Grifols Therapeutics LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Zinman L, Ng E, Bril V. IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2007 Mar 13;68(11):837-41. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000256698.69121.45.
PMID: 17353471BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vera Bril, BSc, MD, FRCPC
University Health Network, Toronto
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Barth, MD
University Heatlh Network
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2010
First Posted
August 11, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 11, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-08