Critical Smoke Alarm Characteristics to Awaken Children From Stage 4 Sleep
2 other identifiers
interventional
834
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Specific Aim 1 is to test the hypothesis that there are specific characteristics of a voice smoke alarm (i.e., use of child's first name, behavior commands in the message content, use of mother's voice, and stimulus frequency) that will awaken children 5-12 years old in stage 4 sleep. The successful children's alarm will be tested among adult subjects to evaluate effectiveness across the age spectrum. Specific Aim 2 is to test the hypothesis that there are specific characteristics of a voice smoke alarm (i.e., use of mother's voice and behavior commands in the message content) that will result in successful completion of simulated escape behaviors by children 5-12 years old after awakening from stage 4 sleep. The successful children's alarm will be tested among adult subjects to evaluate effectiveness across the age spectrum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 6, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 21, 2018
CompletedNovember 5, 2019
November 1, 2019
8.1 years
July 20, 2010
November 1, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Awaken (Yes/No)
Subject awakened by alarm (Yes/No)
Day 1 - Immediately following each alarm
Escape (Yes/No)
Subject successfully performed simulated escape procedure (Yes/No)
Day 1 - Immediately following each alarm
Time to awaken
Time from onset of alarm until EEG-defined awakening
Day 1 - Immediately following each alarm
Time to Escape
Time from onset of alarm until child exits sleep room
Day 1 - Immediately following each alarm
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reaction time
Day 1 - Immediately after awakening
Study Arms (5)
Study 3. Adults 20-49 Years of Age
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsing a randomized, non-blinded, repeated measures, clinical intervention design, our two working hypotheses as stated in Specific Aims 1 and 2 will be tested in a linked study, Study 3, with adult participants 20-49 years of age to ensure that the alarms tested will also work for adults in this age group. This arm will use the alarm signal identified in Study 2 that is significantly associated with Electroencephalography (EEG)-defined awakening and successful completion of simulated escape behaviors by children after awakening from slow wave sleep. A lower frequency tone smoke alarm will evaluate the influence of alarm signal frequency on awakening. A conventional residential tone smoke alarm will be used as a reference stimulus. Both a male and a female voice will be used as alarm stimuli. Note that these will be strangers' voices, and not a mother's voice.
Study 4. Older Adults 60-84 Years of Age
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy 4 of this project will take the voice alarm script in Study 2 and compare it with a low-frequency 520 Hz square wave tone smoke alarm in awakening older adults 60-84 years of age from slow wave sleep and prompting their performance of a simulated escape procedure. Note that this will necessarily be a female stranger's voice, and not a mother's voice, in this older age group. As in Studies 1 and 2, a conventional residential tone smoke alarm will be used as a reference stimulus in Study 4. In order to maintain the same experimental design across these studies, a fourth alarm type will be introduced. This fourth alarm will be a hybrid of the low-frequency 520 Hz square wave tone smoke alarm and the voice alarm, i.e., the stimulus will begin with the 520 Hz square wave tone in a T-3 pattern followed by the voice script, with this stimulus being repeated until the subject completes the escape procedure.
Study 1. Maternal Voice Smoke Alarm Characteristics
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy 1. Identification of Specific Maternal Voice Smoke Alarm Characteristics Associated With Awakening and Escaping. Using a randomized, non-blinded, repeated measures, clinical intervention design, Study 1 will identify the critical elements (i.e., use of child's first name and/or behavior commands in message content) in the maternal voice signal that are significantly associated with EEG-defined awakening (and completion of simulated escape behaviors by children after awakening from S4). A conventional residential tone smoke alarm meeting current NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm Code will be used as a reference stimulus to allow comparison of responses to the voice alarm stimuli with responses to a conventional residential tone alarm stimulus.
Study 2. Mother's Versus Stranger's Voice Alarms & Alarm Freq.
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy 2. Comparison of Mother's Versus Stranger's Voice Smoke Alarms and Alarm Frequency. Study 2 will take the voice alarm script that was the most successful in Study 1 in awakening and prompting children to perform the simulated escape behaviors, and will compare mother's voice to a female stranger's voice using this script. This will determine whether mother's voice is a critical factor for success of the voice smoke alarm. In addition, a Temporal-Three (T-3) pattern smoke alarm with dominant tones in lower frequency ranges similar to the human voice range will be included as a stimulus in Study 2 to evaluate the influence of alarm signal frequency on EEG-defined awakening (as well as completion of simulated escape behaviors by children after awakening from S4). As in Study 1, a conventional residential tone smoke alarm will be used as a reference stimulus in Study 2. This conventional residential tone alarm has a higher frequency signal than the other T-3 tone alarm.
Study 5. Male Voice and Hybrid Tone/Voice Alarm for Children
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy 5. Children 5-12 Years of Age (Testing Male Voice and Hybrid Tone/Voice Alarm) Using a randomized, non-blinded, repeated measures, clinical intervention design, our two working hypotheses as stated in Specific Aims 1 and 2 will be tested in Study 5 among children 5-12 years of age using the following 4 alarm stimuli: female stranger's voice, male stranger's voice, hybrid of the low-frequency 520 Hz square wave tone smoke alarm and the voice alarm (from Study 4), and conventional high frequency tone residential alarm. This study arm will allow comparison of a male versus female voice and also evaluate the hybrid low frequency tone/voice alarm among children 5-12 years of age. The same protocol will be used for children in this study arm as was used in Studies 1 and 2.
Interventions
See arm descriptions for information about the smoke alarm stimuli interventions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Child is at least 5 years of age and has not yet had his/her thirteenth birthday (for Studies # 1, 2, and 5).
- Subject (and child's caretaker for Studies #1, 2, and 5) speak English (2000 Census data indicate that less than 5% of the population older than five years of age in Franklin County, Ohio \[where the study is located\] speaks English less than "very well").
- Subject/family is able to be contacted by telephone (to obtain pre-study information and to remind the family about the study appointment and confirm that the child is in a normal state of health on day of study).
- For adult study arms: Study 3: Subjects are 20-49 years of age; Study 4: Subjects are 60-84 years of age.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has a clinical diagnosis that may affect sleep, arousal or ability to perform the escape procedure.
- Subject has a hearing impairment.
- Subject is taking medication that may affect sleep, arousal, or ability to perform the escape procedure.
- Subject has an acute illness at the time of the sleep study.
- The target population for Study 3 consists of adults 20-49 years of age, who have not yet had his/her fiftieth birthday. Adult participants must not have a clinical diagnosis that may affect sleep, arousal or ability to perform the simulated escape procedure. He/she must not have a hearing impairment; not be taking medication that may affect sleep, arousal, or ability to perform the escape procedure; and not have an acute illness at the time of the sleep study. The adult must speak English and be able to be contacted by telephone (to obtain pre-study information and to remind the participant about the study appointment and confirm that he/she is in a normal state of health on the day of the study).
- The target population for Study 4 consists of older adults 60-84 years of age, who have not yet had his/her eighty-fifth birthday. The older adult must not have a clinical diagnosis that may affect sleep, arousal or ability to perform the escape; not have a hearing impairment; and not be taking medication that may affect sleep, arousal, or ability to perform the simulated escape procedure. The older adult must not have an acute illness at the time of the sleep study. The older adult must speak English and be able to be contacted by telephone (to obtain pre-study information and to remind the participant about the study appointment and confirm that he/she is in a normal state of health on the day of the study).
- The target population for Study 5 is the same as that for Studies 1 and 2.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
Related Publications (1)
Smith GA, Chounthirath T, Splaingard M. Effectiveness of a Voice Smoke Alarm Using the Child's Name for Sleeping Children: A Randomized Trial. J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;205:250-256.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
PMID: 30482491DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary A. Smith, MD, DrPH
The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, DrPH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2010
First Posted
July 26, 2010
Study Start
August 6, 2010
Primary Completion
September 21, 2018
Study Completion
September 21, 2018
Last Updated
November 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11