Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion Pilot
MINT Pilot
2 other identifiers
interventional
110
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate two approaches to red blood cell transfusion in anemic patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2009
Typical duration for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2014
CompletedMarch 20, 2019
March 1, 2019
2.8 years
March 17, 2010
August 14, 2014
March 10, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Hemoglobin Concentration
Differences in the mean hemoglobin concentrations between the two study arms.
In-hospital up to 30 days post randomization
Red Blood Cell Transfusion
Differences in mean number of units of red blood cell transfusions between the two study arms.
In-hospital up to 30 days post randomization
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Mortality or Myocardial Ischemia
30 days
Mortality or Myocardial Ischemia
6 months
Individual Components of Composite Outcome
30 days
Mortality From Cardiac Causes
30 days
Unscheduled Hospital Admission
30 days
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Liberal Transfusion Strategy
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomly allocated to the liberal transfusion strategy receive one unit of packed red cells following randomization and receive enough blood to raise the hemoglobin concentration above 10 g/dL any time the hemoglobin concentration is detected to be below 10g/dL during the hospitalization for up to 30 days. Any transfusion following the initial unit of packed red cells must be preceded by blood test documenting a hemoglobin concentration below 10 g/dL.
Restrictive transfusion strategy
EXPERIMENTALReceive a transfusion if they develop symptoms related to anemia. Transfusion is also permitted, but not required, in the absence of symptoms only if the hemoglobin concentration falls below 8 g/dL. Blood is administered one unit at a time and the presence of symptoms is reassessed. Only enough blood is given to relieve symptoms. If the transfusion is given because the hemoglobin concentration falls below 8 g/dL, then only enough blood is given to increase the hemoglobin concentration above 8 g/dL. Symptoms of anemia that will be indications for transfusion are: 1) Definite angina requiring treatment with sublingual nitroglycerin or equivalent therapy. 2) Unexplained tachycardia or hypotension.
Interventions
Liberal versus restrictive transfusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18 or older;
- STEMI (ST segment elevated myocardial infarction)
- NSTEMI (Non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction)
- unstable angina
- stable coronary artery disease (undergoing cardiac catheterization during the index hospitalization);
- written informed consent has been obtained
- hemoglobin concentration less than 10 g/dL at the time of random allocation.
You may not qualify if:
- bleeding cannot be controlled at the cardiac catheterization puncture site and/or require surgery to repair vessel
- retroperitoneal bleeding requiring surgery
- clinically important hemodynamic instability based on the judgment of the treating physician
- terminal malignancy or life expectancy less than 6 months
- scheduled for cardiac surgery within the next 30 days
- symptomatic at the time of randomization
- declines blood transfusion
- history of a clinically significant transfusion reaction
- inability to provide informed consent;
- enrolled in a competing study
- previous participation in the MINT trial
- any patient who in the judgment of the research team should not be enrolled in the trial. This would include, but not be limited to, factors such alcohol or drug dependence, or psychiatric illness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jerseylead
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)collaborator
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
- Albert Einstein College of Medicinecollaborator
- Brigham and Women's Hospitalcollaborator
- Rhode Island Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, United States
Jack D. Weiler Hospital of Montefiore Medical Center
New York, New York, 10461, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461-2301, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
University of Pittsburgh Data Coordinating Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Related Publications (3)
Carson JL, Brooks MM, Abbott JD, Chaitman B, Kelsey SF, Triulzi DJ, Srinivas V, Menegus MA, Marroquin OC, Rao SV, Noveck H, Passano E, Hardison RM, Smitherman T, Vagaonescu T, Wimmer NJ, Williams DO. Liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2013 Jun;165(6):964-971.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
PMID: 23708168RESULTCarson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Fergusson DA, Pagano MB, Roubinian NH, Turgeon AF, Valentine S, Trivella M, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 20;10(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub6.
PMID: 41114449DERIVEDCarson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
PMID: 34932836DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This pilot trial was not designed to enroll enough patients to answer the transfusion dilemma currently facing clinicians in practice.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jeffrey Carson
- Organization
- Rutgers University
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jeffrey L Carson, MD
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheryl F Kelsey, PhD
University of Pittsburgh Data Coordinating Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Jeffrey L Carson
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2010
First Posted
July 22, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 20, 2019
Results First Posted
August 28, 2014
Record last verified: 2019-03