NCT01166529

Brief Summary

Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been performed for nearly 100 years to alleviate the abdominal pain associated with pancreatic malignancy and other conditions, and is usually undertaken at a late stage in the disease process, when analgesic options have been largely exhausted or have led to significant and often unacceptable side effects. Until recently, CPN was most commonly performed under radiographic guidance; however, in the last 10 years, CPN has been routinely performed under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. Several case series have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this technique when used to treat the pain associated with pancreatic malignancy and/or chronic pancreatitis. However, the efficacy of EUS-guided CPN in the treatment of pain related to non-pancreatic malignancies has yet to be described. The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of EUS-guided CPN in the management of pain in patients with abdominal non-pancreatic malignancies. Our hypothesis is that EUS-guided CPN will provide adequate pain relief in these patients.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 19, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2010

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2010

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2014

Status Verified

September 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

July 19, 2010

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference between the mean pain score prior to and 1 month after the procedure, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

    The BPI will be filled out just prior to and 1 month after the procedure to assess the difference in the mean pain score after the procedure

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Difference in mean pain scores before and at 1 day after the procedure, 7 days after the procedure, 14 days after the procedure, and at 2 months after the procedure, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).

    2 months

  • Difference in the mean 'level of interference of pain with daily life' score, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). This score will be determined before and after the procedure, determined at the same intervals as mean pain scores.

    2 months

  • Narcotic use over a 24-hour period will be documented each time the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is completed

    2 months

Study Arms (1)

EUS-CPN

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis

Interventions

All patients will receive anesthesia. The linear echo-endoscope will be advanced into the proximal stomach. It will be noted whether the tumor is seen in the celiac axis, if there is flow in the celiac artery, and if the celiac ganglia are seen. The celiac ganglia will be injected directly with 10cc of 0.25% bupivicaine followed by 10cc of 98% dehydrated alcohol. If the celiac ganglia cannot be identified, the posterior and anterior aspects of celiac artery take-off will be injected in a similar manner (twice the volume). Flow in the celiac axis will be confirmed. All injections will be performed with a standard EUS injection needle made especially for CPN . Prior to injection, aspiration will be performed through the needle to ensure that no blood is aspirated.

EUS-CPN

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of an unresectable, non-pancreatic malignancy, including gastric, small intestinal, or proximal colonic malignancies, as well as malignancies of the liver and bile ducts (based on above celiac plexus innervations)
  • Pain directly related to the primary malignant process, as determined by the referring oncologist
  • Pain determined to be refractory to standard medical therapy, or when the medical therapy is ineffective due to certain limitations (such as severe constipation), as determined by the referring oncologist
  • Willingness to undergo EUS-guided CPN
  • Age \> 18 years
  • ECOG performance status of grades 0-3 \[7\]

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable or unwilling to undergo an EUS-guided CPN
  • Contraindication to anesthesia, as determine during the preoperative clearance process
  • Refractory coagulopathy (INR \> 1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 50,000), or aspirin and/or clopidogrel use within 7 days of procedure
  • Current pregnancy
  • Prior celiac plexus block/neurolysis
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • ECOG performance status of grade 4 or higher

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Christo PJ, Mazloomdoost D. Interventional pain treatments for cancer pain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Sep;1138:299-328. doi: 10.1196/annals.1414.034.

    PMID: 18837908BACKGROUND
  • Chak A. What is the evidence for EUS-guided celiac plexus block/neurolysis? Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2 Suppl):S172-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.022. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19179150BACKGROUND
  • Penman ID, Rosch T; EUS 2008 Working Group. EUS 2008 Working Group document: evaluation of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis/block (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2 Suppl):S28-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.004. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19179165BACKGROUND
  • Puli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML, Antillon MR, Brugge WR. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pain due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Nov;54(11):2330-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0651-x. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

    PMID: 19137428BACKGROUND
  • Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983 Oct;17(2):197-210. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90143-4.

    PMID: 6646795BACKGROUND
  • Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7165009BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainNeoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Raj N Keswani, MD

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asssociate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2010

First Posted

July 21, 2010

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion

July 1, 2013

Study Completion

July 1, 2013

Last Updated

September 25, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-09

Locations