Study Stopped
Unable to identify appropriate patients.
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in the Management of Pain in Abdominal Non-pancreatic Malignancies
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis (CPN) in the Management of Pain in Abdominal Non-pancreatic Malignancies
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) has been performed for nearly 100 years to alleviate the abdominal pain associated with pancreatic malignancy and other conditions, and is usually undertaken at a late stage in the disease process, when analgesic options have been largely exhausted or have led to significant and often unacceptable side effects. Until recently, CPN was most commonly performed under radiographic guidance; however, in the last 10 years, CPN has been routinely performed under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. Several case series have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this technique when used to treat the pain associated with pancreatic malignancy and/or chronic pancreatitis. However, the efficacy of EUS-guided CPN in the treatment of pain related to non-pancreatic malignancies has yet to be described. The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of EUS-guided CPN in the management of pain in patients with abdominal non-pancreatic malignancies. Our hypothesis is that EUS-guided CPN will provide adequate pain relief in these patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedSeptember 25, 2014
September 1, 2014
2.9 years
July 19, 2010
September 23, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference between the mean pain score prior to and 1 month after the procedure, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
The BPI will be filled out just prior to and 1 month after the procedure to assess the difference in the mean pain score after the procedure
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Difference in mean pain scores before and at 1 day after the procedure, 7 days after the procedure, 14 days after the procedure, and at 2 months after the procedure, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
2 months
Difference in the mean 'level of interference of pain with daily life' score, as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). This score will be determined before and after the procedure, determined at the same intervals as mean pain scores.
2 months
Narcotic use over a 24-hour period will be documented each time the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is completed
2 months
Study Arms (1)
EUS-CPN
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
All patients will receive anesthesia. The linear echo-endoscope will be advanced into the proximal stomach. It will be noted whether the tumor is seen in the celiac axis, if there is flow in the celiac artery, and if the celiac ganglia are seen. The celiac ganglia will be injected directly with 10cc of 0.25% bupivicaine followed by 10cc of 98% dehydrated alcohol. If the celiac ganglia cannot be identified, the posterior and anterior aspects of celiac artery take-off will be injected in a similar manner (twice the volume). Flow in the celiac axis will be confirmed. All injections will be performed with a standard EUS injection needle made especially for CPN . Prior to injection, aspiration will be performed through the needle to ensure that no blood is aspirated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of an unresectable, non-pancreatic malignancy, including gastric, small intestinal, or proximal colonic malignancies, as well as malignancies of the liver and bile ducts (based on above celiac plexus innervations)
- Pain directly related to the primary malignant process, as determined by the referring oncologist
- Pain determined to be refractory to standard medical therapy, or when the medical therapy is ineffective due to certain limitations (such as severe constipation), as determined by the referring oncologist
- Willingness to undergo EUS-guided CPN
- Age \> 18 years
- ECOG performance status of grades 0-3 \[7\]
You may not qualify if:
- Unable or unwilling to undergo an EUS-guided CPN
- Contraindication to anesthesia, as determine during the preoperative clearance process
- Refractory coagulopathy (INR \> 1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 50,000), or aspirin and/or clopidogrel use within 7 days of procedure
- Current pregnancy
- Prior celiac plexus block/neurolysis
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- ECOG performance status of grade 4 or higher
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (6)
Christo PJ, Mazloomdoost D. Interventional pain treatments for cancer pain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Sep;1138:299-328. doi: 10.1196/annals.1414.034.
PMID: 18837908BACKGROUNDChak A. What is the evidence for EUS-guided celiac plexus block/neurolysis? Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2 Suppl):S172-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.022. No abstract available.
PMID: 19179150BACKGROUNDPenman ID, Rosch T; EUS 2008 Working Group. EUS 2008 Working Group document: evaluation of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis/block (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2 Suppl):S28-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.004. No abstract available.
PMID: 19179165BACKGROUNDPuli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML, Antillon MR, Brugge WR. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pain due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Nov;54(11):2330-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0651-x. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
PMID: 19137428BACKGROUNDDaut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983 Oct;17(2):197-210. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90143-4.
PMID: 6646795BACKGROUNDOken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available.
PMID: 7165009BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Raj N Keswani, MD
Northwestern University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asssociate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2010
First Posted
July 21, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09