Anticholinergic vs. Botox Comparison Study
ABC
Efficacy and Impact of Botulinum Toxin A Versus Anticholinergic Therapy for the Treatment of Bothersome Urge Urinary Incontinence
9 other identifiers
interventional
249
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Urinary incontinence is a prevalent condition that markedly impacts quality of life and disproportionately affects women. Overactive Bladder syndrome (OAB) is defined as symptoms of urgency and frequency with urge urinary incontinence (OAB-wet) and without urge incontinence (OAB-dry). Conservative first line treatments for urge incontinence combined with other OAB symptoms (OAB-wet) include behavioral therapy, pelvic floor training +/- biofeedback, or the use of anticholinergic medications. These treatment modalities may not result in total continence and often drug therapy is discontinued because of lack of efficacy, side effects and cost or because of not wanting to take a pill. Behavioral therapy and pelvic muscle exercises require consistent, active intervention by the patient which is often not sustained. Thus, the objective of the Anticholinergic vs Botox Comparison Study (ABC) is to determine whether a single intra-detrusor injection of botulinum toxin A (Botox A®) is more effective than a standardized regimen of oral anticholinergics in reducing urge urinary incontinence. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the change from baseline in average number of urge urinary incontinence episodes over 6 months between groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2010
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 6, 2017
CompletedMay 2, 2018
April 1, 2018
2.2 years
July 19, 2010
April 18, 2017
April 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Urge Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes
Change from baseline in mean number of UUI episodes over 6 month double-blind period.
Baseline through 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Score on OABq-SF
Baseline through 6 months
Efficacy
6 months
Change in PFDI-SF and PFIQ-SF Total Scores
Baseline through 6 months
Patient Global Impression of Improvement
3 and 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Botox A
EXPERIMENTALA single intradetrusor injection of 100U botulinum toxin A (Botox A®) plus daily oral placebo tablets
Standardized Anticholinergic Regimen
ACTIVE COMPARATORA standardized 3-step anticholinergic regimen of daily oral solifenacin 5mg, solifenacin 10mg, and/or trospium chloride XR 60mg, as well as a single intradetrusor injection of saline (placebo). All subjects will begin on solifenacin 5 mg for 2 mo. If a subject's symptoms are not adequately controlled at 2 mo, she will be escalated to solifenacin 10mg, and similarly at 4 mo to trospium XR 60mg. If a subject's symptoms are adequately controlled on solifenacin 5 mg, she may continue that study medication for the entirety of the study (6 mo). Additionally, if a subject is dose-escalated to solifenacin 10mg at study mo 2 or 4, and her symptoms are adequately controlled, she may continue the solifenacin 10mg dose for the remainder of the study.
Interventions
A single intradetrusor injection of 100U botulinum toxin A in 10 mL plus 0.1 mL of indigo carmine administered during cytoscopy. Between 100 and 200ml of saline is instilled into the bladder prior to injection to allow adequate visualization of the entire bladder urothelium. The treating physician will inject a total of 10.1 mL of the masked substance into approximately 15 to 20 different detrusor muscle sites under direct visualization using disposable needles. Injections will be spread out to equally cover the posterior bladder wall and dome, but spare the bladder trigone and ureteral orifices.
Oral Solifenacin 5mg once a day for up to 6 months
Oral Solifenacin 10mg once a day for up to 4 months
Oral Trospium chloride XR 60mg once a day for up to 2 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has signed informed consent.
- Females at least 21 years of age
- Five or more urge urinary incontinence episodes on a three-day voiding diary. Urge incontinence episodes will be determined based on voiding diary and subject indication of coincident urge symptoms, allowing self-characterization of incontinence type.
- Urge predominant (urge \>50% of total incontinent episodes) urinary incontinence based on self-reported characterization of incontinent episodes on diary.
- Demonstrated ability (or have caregiver demonstrate ability) to perform clean intermittent self-catheterization in the event that this would be required.
- Request for treatment for urge urinary incontinence. The patient may have tried other non-pharmacologic treatments for urge incontinence, such as supervised behavioral therapy, supervised physical therapy, unsupervised physical therapy, supervised biofeedback, and transvaginal electrical stimulation.
- Subject has undergone 3-week washout period if subject were on anticholinergic therapy prior to enrollment.
- Subject is able to complete all study related items and interviews.
You may not qualify if:
- Any previous therapy with trospium chloride, solifenacin, or darifenacin
- Failed three or more anticholinergic drugs.
- Contraindication to anticholinergic therapy, specifically with solifenacin or trospium.
- Current symptomatic urinary tract infection that has not resolved prior to randomization.
- Uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma
- Gastric retention
- Baseline need for intermittent self catheterization
- PVR \>150ml on 2 occasions with void(s) of greater than 150ml
- Surgical treatment for stress incontinence (sling, Burch or urethral injection) or pelvic organ prolapse recommended or planned at enrollment by study investigator(s).
- Any prior intra-detrusor botulinum toxin A injections
- Previous or currently implanted neuromodulation (sacral or tibial).
- Surgically altered detrusor muscle, such as augmentation cystoplasty.
- Known allergy to botulinum toxin A.
- Women with known neurologic disease believed to potentially affect urinary function (Multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, myasthenia gravis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease).
- Known allergy to lidocaine.
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249, United States
USCD Medical Center
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Kaiser Permanente
San Diego, California, 92037, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Oakwood Hospital
Dearborn, Michigan, 48124, United States
Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Magee-Women's Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Related Publications (6)
Choi BI, Fontes Noronha M, Kaindl J, Wolfe AJ. Complete genome sequences of Aerococcus loyolae ATCC TSD-300T, Aerococcus mictus ATCC TSD-301T, and Aerococcus tenax ATCC TSD-302T. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2024 Jun 11;13(6):e0015624. doi: 10.1128/mra.00156-24. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
PMID: 38651909DERIVEDHendrickson WK, Amundsen CL, Rahn DD, Meyer I, Bradley MS, Smith AL, Myers DL, Jelovsek JE, Lukacz ES. Comparison of 100 U With 200 U of Intradetrusor OnabotulinumToxinA for Nonneurogenic Urgency Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Mar 1;27(3):140-146. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001020.
PMID: 33620895DERIVEDVisco AG, Zyczynski H, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Xu X, Lukacz ES, Paraiso MF, Greer J, Rahn DD, Meikle SF, Honeycutt AA. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anticholinergics Versus Botox for Urgency Urinary Incontinence: Results From the Anticholinergic Versus Botox Comparison Randomized Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):311-6. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000277.
PMID: 27564385DERIVEDVisco AG, Brubaker L, Jelovsek JE, Wilson TS, Norton P, Zyczynski HM, Spino C, Sirls L, Nguyen JN, Rahn DD, Meikle SF, Nolen TL; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Adherence to Oral Therapy for Urgency Urinary Incontinence: Results from the Anticholinergic Versus Botox Comparison (ABC) Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):24-8. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000215.
PMID: 26516810DERIVEDVisco AG, Brubaker L, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Paraiso MF, Menefee SA, Schaffer J, Lowder J, Khandwala S, Sirls L, Spino C, Nolen TL, Wallace D, Meikle SF; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Anticholinergic therapy vs. onabotulinumtoxina for urgency urinary incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1803-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208872. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
PMID: 23036134DERIVEDVisco AG, Brubaker L, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Paraiso MF, Menefee SA, Schaffer J, Wei J, Chai T, Janz N, Spino C, Meikle S; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Anticholinergic versus botulinum toxin A comparison trial for the treatment of bothersome urge urinary incontinence: ABC trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jan;33(1):184-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.019. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
PMID: 22008247DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Marie Gantz
- Organization
- RTI International
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Anthony Visco, MD
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2010
First Posted
July 21, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 2, 2018
Results First Posted
December 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share