NCT01165970

Brief Summary

Symptomatic hyposalivation is associated not only with Sjögren's syndrome or salivary gland hypofunction in elderly patients, but also with medications containing antimuscarinic drugs, chemo radiotherapy for head and neck carcinomas, and psychiatric disorders (Atkinson \& Ava, 1994, Kielbassa et al., 2006). Human saliva possesses important physiological functions in protecting and moistening the oral hard and soft tissues (Piotrowski et al., 1992, ). Consequently, decreasing salivation causes oral dysfunction and promotes severe oral side effects (reduced antibacterial function, lack of remineralisation, reduced buffer capacity) (Tschoppe et al., 2010a). These have been identified as being responsible for the rapid destruction of the dentition (Willich et al., 1988). Saliva substitutes are frequently applied for relieving the symptoms in patients suffering from hyposalivation (Hahnel et al., 2009, Nieuw Amerongen \& Veerman, 2003, Vissink et al., 2004). Besides the moistening and lubrication of the oral mucosa, these products should also protect dental hard tissues. However, in vitro studies revealed that some marketed products have only a neutral or even a demineralising potential on enamel as well as on dentin (Kielbassa et al., 2001, Meyer-Lueckel et al., 2002, Smith et al., 2001, Tschoppe et al., 2009). Inorganic ions such as calcium, phosphates, and fluorides have been added to saliva substitutes in order to enhance their remineralising property or minimize their demineralising potential (Tschoppe et al., 2009). Furthermore, as most patients suffering from hyposalivation are elderly people, recessions and subsequently exposed dentin surfaces are very common. Since dentin is not as acid resistant as enamel, an earlier and more severe demineralisation can be expected (Saunders \& Meyerowitz, 2005). Therefore, the current in situ study was performed to assess the effects of a demineralising and a remineralising saliva substitutes on the mineralisation of dental hard tissues. It was hypothesized that storage in Glandosane(cell pharm, Hannover, Germany) would not result in pronounced mineral loss of dentin specimens, and that storage in Saliva natura would not result in enhanced remineralisation when combined with a remineralising artificial saliva (Saliva natura supersaturated with respect to relevant calcium phosphates; medac, Hamburg, Germany) (H0). These null hypotheses were tested against the alternative hypothesis of a difference.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2009

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 30, 2010

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2010

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2012

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

November 15, 2011

Status Verified

November 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

June 30, 2010

Last Update Submit

November 12, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

enameldentinsaliva substitutedemineralizationremineralization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mineral loss and lesion depth of specimens

    Evaluation of the mineral loss/lesion depth of the enamel and dentin specimens after in situ exposition evaluated with transversal microradiography. The Unit is the mineral oss as well as lesion depth.

    15 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • general and oral well being

    15 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Glandosane

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After in situ exposition the enamel and dentin samples will demineralize with Glandosane.

Drug: Glandosane

Saliva natura

EXPERIMENTAL

After in situ exposition the enamel and dentin samples will remineralize with Saliva natura

Device: Saliva natura

Interventions

according to the german law the sued saliva substitute is a drug (Glandosane) whereas Saliva natura is a medical product

Also known as: Glandosane, Cell Pharm, Germany
Glandosane

Saliva substitute without restriction to be used

Also known as: Saliva natura, Medac, Germany
Saliva natura

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • stimulated salivary flow rate \< 0.5 ml/min
  • partial denture upper or lower jaw
  • radiationtherapy in the head and neck area
  • patient age above 18 years
  • Signed informed consent (AMG §40 (1) 3b)

You may not qualify if:

  • stimulated salivary flow rate \> 0.5 ml/min
  • missing partial denture upper or lower jaw
  • missing Radiationtherapy in the head and neck area
  • paraben allergy
  • not signed informed consent (AMG §40 (1) 3b)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Charite, Berlin, Germany

Berlin, State of Berlin, 14197, Germany

Location

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Berlin, State of Berlin, 14197, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Tschoppe P, Wolf O, Eichhorn M, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Design of a randomized controlled double-blind crossover clinical trial to assess the effects of saliva substitutes on bovine enamel and dentin in situ. BMC Oral Health. 2011 Apr 9;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-11-13.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Xerostomia

Interventions

Glandosane

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Salivary Gland DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Peter Tschoppe, Dr

    Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, CharitéCentrum 3, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2010

First Posted

July 20, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion

March 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

November 15, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-11

Locations