NCT01165554

Brief Summary

To determine the level of association between quantitative regional estimates of brain uptake of \[18F\]flutemetamol and quantitative immunohistochemical regional estimates of brain levels of amyloid estimated from post-mortem analysis of corresponding brain tissue samples.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
203

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 21, 2010

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2010

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2011

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 4, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

December 4, 2013

Status Verified

November 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

June 21, 2010

Results QC Date

May 7, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 8, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

AmyloidPET-Positron Emission TomographySUVR-Standard uptake value ratios

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Sensitivity of Blinded Visual Interpretations of [18F]Flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Images Without Anatomic Brain Images for Detecting Brain Fibrillar Amyloid β.

    A calculation used to assess Sensitivity was (Number of Blinded Reads determined abnormal by Reader "N") divided by the (Total number of abnormal participants). Blinded visual interpretations of \[18F\]flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images without anatomic brain images for detecting brain fibrillar amyloid β.

    Post flutemetamol administration.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, Without Anatomic Brain Images.

    Post Flutemetamol administrations

  • Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Abnormal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.

    Post flutemetamol administration.

  • Blinded Visual Interpretation of Each Subject's Flutemetamol F 18 Injection Brain PET Images as Normal, With Anatomic CT Brain Images for Reference.

    Post flutemetamol administration.

Study Arms (1)

[18F] Flutemetamol

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: [18F] Flutemetamol

Interventions

Flutemetamol (18F) Injection, 111 to 370 MBq (3 to 10 mCi), single intravenous injection.

Also known as: AH110690
[18F] Flutemetamol

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject has a short life expectancy (approximately 1 year or less) as estimated by the Investigator.
  • The subject is 70 years of age or older if cognitively normal, or 55 years of age or older if terminal because of dementia.
  • The subject's general health is adequate to undergo the study procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • The subject has a contraindication for PET.
  • The subject has a known or suspected hypersensitivity/allergy to \[18F\]flutemetamol or to any of the excipients.
  • The subject is unable to tolerate or cooperate with study procedures.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

GE Healthcare

Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Kim SJ, Jang H, Yoo H, Na DL, Ham H, Kim HJ, Kim JP, Farrar G, Moon SH, Seo SW. Clinical and Pathological Validation of CT-Based Regional Harmonization Methods of Amyloid PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2024 Jan 1;49(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004937. Epub 2023 Nov 29.

  • Tome SO, Tsaka G, Ronisz A, Ospitalieri S, Gawor K, Gomes LA, Otto M, von Arnim CAF, Van Damme P, Van Den Bosch L, Ghebremedhin E, Laureyssen C, Sleegers K, Vandenberghe R, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J, Thal DR. TDP-43 pathology is associated with increased tau burdens and seeding. Mol Neurodegener. 2023 Sep 30;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13024-023-00653-0.

  • Thal DR, Ronisz A, Tousseyn T, Rijal Upadhaya A, Balakrishnan K, Vandenberghe R, Vandenbulcke M, von Arnim CAF, Otto M, Beach TG, Lilja J, Heurling K, Chakrabarty A, Ismail A, Buckley C, Smith APL, Kumar S, Farrar G, Walter J. Different aspects of Alzheimer's disease-related amyloid beta-peptide pathology and their relationship to amyloid positron emission tomography imaging and dementia. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019 Nov 14;7(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s40478-019-0837-9.

  • Thal DR, Beach TG, Zanette M, Lilja J, Heurling K, Chakrabarty A, Ismail A, Farrar G, Buckley C, Smith APL. Estimation of amyloid distribution by [18F]flutemetamol PET predicts the neuropathological phase of amyloid beta-protein deposition. Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Oct;136(4):557-567. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1897-9. Epub 2018 Aug 19.

  • Ikonomovic MD, Buckley CJ, Heurling K, Sherwin P, Jones PA, Zanette M, Mathis CA, Klunk WE, Chakrabarty A, Ironside J, Ismail A, Smith C, Thal DR, Beach TG, Farrar G, Smith AP. Post-mortem histopathology underlying beta-amyloid PET imaging following flutemetamol F 18 injection. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Dec 12;4(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0399-z.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Interventions

flutemetamol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DementiaBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTauopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Paul Sherwin
Organization
GE Healthcare

Study Officials

  • Paul Sherwin, MD, PhD

    GE Healthcare

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2010

First Posted

July 20, 2010

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion

November 1, 2011

Study Completion

November 1, 2011

Last Updated

December 4, 2013

Results First Posted

December 4, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-11

Locations