Study on the Effect of Cervical Mobilization on Motor Function and Pressure Pain Threshold in Pain Free Individuals
A Crossover Study on the Effect of Cervical Mobilization on Motor Function and Pressure Pain Threshold in Pain Free Individuals
1 other identifier
interventional
24
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Passive accessory cervical mobilization is widely used as a clinical approach to the management of musculoskeletal pain of spinal origin. The purpose of the study is to determine if passive cervical mobilization can improve motor function in situations where motor performance is not impaired by the presence of pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2005
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2010
CompletedJuly 14, 2010
November 1, 2005
6 months
July 8, 2010
July 13, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Electromyography of sternocleidomastoid muscle.
Measurement of sternocleidomastoid muscle activation during deep neck flexion. The degree of neck flexion is determined by a pressure biofeedback unit place underneath the neck. EMG of the left and right sternocleidomastoids are recorded for 5seconds at each level of neck flexion
Pre intervention (baseline) and 1 minute post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pressure pain threshold
Pre intervention (baseline) and 1 minute post intervention
Study Arms (3)
Passive cervical mobilisation
ACTIVE COMPARATORGrade III cervical mobilization technique as described by Maitland. Applied to left C5/6 Segment.
Manual contact
PLACEBO COMPARATORManual contact control, which involved light manual contact on the left C5/C6 segment as if to perform the treatment technique.
Non-contact control
NO INTERVENTIONNon-contact control, which involved the subject resting in the treatment position without any physical contact between the researcher and the subject.
Interventions
Passive cervical mobilization which involved an oscillatory grade III unilateral postero-anterior mobilization applied to the left C5/C6 segment. The mobilization consisted of 3 periods of 1 minute applications with a resting period of 1 minute in between.
Manual contact control, which involved light manual contact on the left C5/C6 segment as if to perform the treatment technique. The light manual contact consisted of 3 periods of 1 minute applications with a resting period of 1 minute in between.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- No history of neck or back pain over the last six months
- Without any previous experience with spinal manual therapy techniques
You may not qualify if:
- History of musculoskeletal or rheumatologic conditions
- Any kind of spinal surgery
- Dizziness
- Previous trauma to the cervical spine
- Neurological signs or symptoms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benjamin Soon Tze Chin, MManipTher
The University of Queensland
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Annina Schmid, MManipTher
The University of Queensland
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elias Fridriksson, MManipTher
Curtin University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philip Cheong, MManipTher
Curtin University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elisabeth Gresslos, MManipTher
Curitn University of Technology
- STUDY CHAIR
Anthony Wright, PhD
Curtin University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2010
First Posted
July 14, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2005
Primary Completion
October 1, 2005
Study Completion
December 1, 2005
Last Updated
July 14, 2010
Record last verified: 2005-11