NCT01160367

Brief Summary

Specific Aims and Hypotheses: Aim 1: To test the effect of the "Trial of Ascertaining Individual preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-life Decisions" (TAILORED) Intervention on family decision-making self-efficacy at 8 weeks both with respect to the patient's present situation and in a hypothetical situation in which the patient lacks decision-making capacity. Hypotheses 1a: Family decision-making self-efficacy will be greater at 8 weeks in pairs that have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in pairs receiving the standard information on advance directives in the patient's present situation. Hypotheses 1b: Family decision-making self-efficacy will be greater at 8 weeks in pairs that have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in pairs receiving the standard information on advance directives in the hypothetical situation in which the patient lacks decision making capacity. Aim 2: To test the effect of the TAILORED Intervention on family psychological outcomes (depression, caregiver burden, decision making distress). Hypotheses 2a: Depression will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives. Hypotheses 2b: Caregiver burden will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives. Hypotheses 2c: Decision-making distress will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives. Aim 3: To test the effect of the TAILORED Intervention on patient and family satisfaction with family decision-making involvement. Hypothesis 3a: Patient satisfaction with family decision involvement will be greater at 8 weeks in patients who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in patients receiving the standard information on advance directives. Hypothesis 3b: Family member satisfaction with decision involvement will be greater at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members receiving the standard information on advance directives. Aim 4: To explore family decision-making self-efficacy and perceptions of the TAILORED Intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
431

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 9, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 26, 2010

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 26, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 26, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

July 9, 2010

Last Update Submit

August 31, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • family decision-making self-efficacy

    at 8 weeks after the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • family psychological outcomes (depression, caregiver burden, decision making distress)

    8 weeks after the intervention

Study Arms (2)

standard of care health decision making

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient-family dyads will receive the standard of care for support of patient and family members health care decision making during a clinic appointment.

Other: standard of care

TAILORED intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients and family members who receive the TAILORED Decision Making Intervention

Other: TAILORED Patient Family Decision Making

Interventions

Patient-family dyads will receive TAILORED intervention on health decision making

TAILORED intervention

Patient-family dyads will receive standard of care in health decision-making

standard of care health decision making

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Speaks and reads English
  • Diagnosed by a specialist at either Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions or University of Chicago Medical Center as having ALS or stage III or IV GI or pancreatic cancer.
  • Accompanied to clinic by a family member who may participate in the patient's health care decisions and who patient gives permission to approach for participation in study.
  • Lives within a 2-hour drive of The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions or The University of Chicago Medical Center
  • Age 18 or older
  • Speaks and reads English
  • Identified by the patient-subject as a family member whom the patient may involve in health care decision making in the present and/or should the patient become too ill to make health care decisions.
  • Person who the patient-subject has granted investigators permission to approach for participation in this study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe visual impairment that would limit ability to visualize instrument illustrations
  • Cognitive impairment indicated by a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire adjusted error score of \>5
  • Has no family member who might assist in decision making or family member declines to participate.
  • Is not accompanied to the clinic by family member.
  • <!-- -->
  • Declines to participate.
  • Severe visual impairment that would limit ability to visualize instrument illustrations.
  • Cognitive impairment indicated by a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire adjusted error score of \>5

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Sulmasy DP, Hughes MT, Yenokyan G, Kub J, Terry PB, Astrow AB, Johnson JA, Ho G, Nolan MT. The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Oct;54(4):455-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisGastrointestinal NeoplasmsPancreatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Standard of Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesTDP-43 ProteinopathiesNeuromuscular DiseasesProteostasis DeficienciesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2010

First Posted

July 12, 2010

Study Start

August 26, 2010

Primary Completion

March 26, 2014

Study Completion

March 26, 2014

Last Updated

September 5, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Locations