Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved One's Role in End-of-Life
2 other identifiers
interventional
431
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Specific Aims and Hypotheses: Aim 1: To test the effect of the "Trial of Ascertaining Individual preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-life Decisions" (TAILORED) Intervention on family decision-making self-efficacy at 8 weeks both with respect to the patient's present situation and in a hypothetical situation in which the patient lacks decision-making capacity. Hypotheses 1a: Family decision-making self-efficacy will be greater at 8 weeks in pairs that have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in pairs receiving the standard information on advance directives in the patient's present situation. Hypotheses 1b: Family decision-making self-efficacy will be greater at 8 weeks in pairs that have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in pairs receiving the standard information on advance directives in the hypothetical situation in which the patient lacks decision making capacity. Aim 2: To test the effect of the TAILORED Intervention on family psychological outcomes (depression, caregiver burden, decision making distress). Hypotheses 2a: Depression will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives. Hypotheses 2b: Caregiver burden will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives. Hypotheses 2c: Decision-making distress will be less at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members who have received the standard information on advance directives. Aim 3: To test the effect of the TAILORED Intervention on patient and family satisfaction with family decision-making involvement. Hypothesis 3a: Patient satisfaction with family decision involvement will be greater at 8 weeks in patients who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in patients receiving the standard information on advance directives. Hypothesis 3b: Family member satisfaction with decision involvement will be greater at 8 weeks in family members who have undergone the TAILORED Intervention than in family members receiving the standard information on advance directives. Aim 4: To explore family decision-making self-efficacy and perceptions of the TAILORED Intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 26, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 26, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 26, 2014
CompletedSeptember 5, 2018
August 1, 2018
3.6 years
July 9, 2010
August 31, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
family decision-making self-efficacy
at 8 weeks after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
family psychological outcomes (depression, caregiver burden, decision making distress)
8 weeks after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
standard of care health decision making
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient-family dyads will receive the standard of care for support of patient and family members health care decision making during a clinic appointment.
TAILORED intervention
EXPERIMENTALPatients and family members who receive the TAILORED Decision Making Intervention
Interventions
Patient-family dyads will receive TAILORED intervention on health decision making
Patient-family dyads will receive standard of care in health decision-making
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or older
- Speaks and reads English
- Diagnosed by a specialist at either Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions or University of Chicago Medical Center as having ALS or stage III or IV GI or pancreatic cancer.
- Accompanied to clinic by a family member who may participate in the patient's health care decisions and who patient gives permission to approach for participation in study.
- Lives within a 2-hour drive of The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions or The University of Chicago Medical Center
- Age 18 or older
- Speaks and reads English
- Identified by the patient-subject as a family member whom the patient may involve in health care decision making in the present and/or should the patient become too ill to make health care decisions.
- Person who the patient-subject has granted investigators permission to approach for participation in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe visual impairment that would limit ability to visualize instrument illustrations
- Cognitive impairment indicated by a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire adjusted error score of \>5
- Has no family member who might assist in decision making or family member declines to participate.
- Is not accompanied to the clinic by family member.
- <!-- -->
- Declines to participate.
- Severe visual impairment that would limit ability to visualize instrument illustrations.
- Cognitive impairment indicated by a Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire adjusted error score of \>5
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- University of Chicagocollaborator
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Related Publications (1)
Sulmasy DP, Hughes MT, Yenokyan G, Kub J, Terry PB, Astrow AB, Johnson JA, Ho G, Nolan MT. The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Oct;54(4):455-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
PMID: 28712987DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2010
First Posted
July 12, 2010
Study Start
August 26, 2010
Primary Completion
March 26, 2014
Study Completion
March 26, 2014
Last Updated
September 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08