NCT01156688

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the incidence of side effects of buccal and sublingual misoprostol when combined with mifepristone for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation. The secondary outcome is to compare the complete abortion rate and induction-abortion interval between the two methods of administration of misoprostol.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 30, 2010

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 5, 2010

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2010

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

August 5, 2011

Status Verified

August 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

June 30, 2010

Last Update Submit

August 3, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

medical abortion for pregnancy of less than 9 weeks gestation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • to compare the incidence of side effects of buccal and sublingual misoprostol when combined with mifepristone for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation.

    within 43 days after mifepristone

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • to compare the complete abortion rate

    up to the time when patient's return of next mense, on average within 60 days after mifepristone

  • to compare the induction-abortion interval

    from insertion of misoprostol to day of abortion process, within 15 days after mifepristone

Study Arms (2)

Sublingual Misoprostol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Misoprostol

Buccal misoprostol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Misoprostol

Interventions

sublingual 800mcg misoprostol 48 hours after oral 200mg mifepristone

Sublingual Misoprostol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • good general health
  • older than the age of legal consent (i.e. \>18 years old)
  • requesting medical abortion and eligible for abortion
  • on Day 1 of the study (day of mifepristone administration) the duration of pregnancy not more than 63 days as confirmed by pelvic ultrasound examination
  • intrauterine pregnancy (intrauterine amniotic sac seen in US)
  • willing to use other than hormonal or intra-uterine contraception until the first menses after termination of pregnancy
  • if treatment fails she agrees to termination of pregnancy with the surgical method
  • willing and able to participate after the study has been explained
  • haemoglobin higher than 10g/L

You may not qualify if:

  • a history or evidence of adrenal pathology, steroid-dependent cancer, porphyria, diastolic pressure over 95mm Hg, bronchial asthma, arterial hypotension.
  • a history or evidence of thrombo-embolism, severe or recurrent liver disease or pruritus of pregnancy
  • the regular use of prescription drugs before admission to the study
  • the presence of an IUCD in utero
  • breast-feeding
  • multiple pregnancies
  • heavy smokers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Family Planning Association

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Misoprostol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological Factors

Study Officials

  • Joyce Chai, MBChB

    The University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2010

First Posted

July 5, 2010

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion

August 1, 2011

Study Completion

August 1, 2011

Last Updated

August 5, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-08

Locations