NCT01155856

Brief Summary

Introduction: With the rapid development in technology telemedicine has become a tool with the potential to improve and optimize the treatment of different diseases and to make diagnostics, treatment and counseling possible over shorter or longer distances. Home based telemedicine is a new method that leads to a series of important questions that needs to be answered. This study is designed to answer questions concerning patient safety in telehomecare, the patients´ quality of life, efficiency and a cost benefit analysis of implementing this technology. This study is about patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are admitted to the hospital with an acute exacerbation. Approximately 24 hours after admission half of the patients are randomized to be admitted to their own home supported by telemedical equipment while the other half remain admitted at the hospital (typically between 5-7 days). Primary Aim: To investigate if telemedical surveillance and treatment in the recovery period of an acute exacerbation is just as safe as conventional admission of patients with COPD measured on treatment failure. Secondary Aims: To evaluate if telemedical surveillance and treatment in the recovery period of an acute exacerbation compared to conventional treatment of COPD:

  1. 1.Is comparable in reestablishing Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1).
  2. 2.Demands the same number of treatment days/time before discharge/cessation of telemedical surveillance.
  3. 3.Is comparable in quality of life in the two groups of treated patients.
  4. 4.Have comparable adverse event profiles.
  5. 5.leads to a lower total cost in health services (health economical analysis)
  6. 6.Is possible to do for the patients (drop-outs because of the technical equipment or the patient does not know how to use the equipment.)
  7. 7.The virtual patient contact / communication
  8. 8.Technology
  9. 9.The work process compared to the conventional work process
  10. 10.Time spent with the patient
  11. 11.Usability
  12. 12.Improvement potentials ("the doctors view")

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
175

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2010

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 21, 2010

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 2, 2010

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 21, 2010

Last Update Submit

June 19, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

telemedicineCOPD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Death

    To study essential safety parameters for the patients the numbers of deaths will be compared in the two groups using data from the Danish Death Registry.

    30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  • readmission

    Readmission can be considered as a treatment failure related to COPD and will thus be assessed in both groups by reviewing the hospital patient administration system.

    30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  • need for additional Prednisolone, additional antibiotics , NIV or life support machine (respirator)

    30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  • Self-efficacy

    Self-efficacy is measured using "The COPD self-efficacy scale". The scale has been validated in Danish, prior to its use in the current sub studies. The patients will be asked to fill in the questionnaire at baseline, and 3 days after discharge

    3 days

  • Cognitive function

    Cognitive function evaluated by a neuropsychological test battery, International Study of Post Operative Cognitive Dysfunction (ISPOCD) including verbal learning, memory capacity and attention.

    3 days and six weeks after discharge

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • FEV1

    30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  • Admission days

    30 days

  • Healthrelated Quality of life

    baseline, discharge, 4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months

  • Adverse event

    30 days

  • cost in health services

    30 days, 3 months, 6 months

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

telemedicine

EXPERIMENTAL

Within 24 hours after admission for exacerbation of COPD, patients in the intervention group are sent home for further treatment (telemedicine based) instead of the conventional treatment at the hospital. Patients in the intervention group will receive the same treatment as the control group and have daily contact with the physician/nurse at the hospital through a videoconference system.

Other: Telemedical admission and treatment in the patients´ own homes instead of conventional admission and treatment at the hospital

control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will receive usual care and treatment at the hospital until discharge(typically between 5-7 days).

Interventions

For this study a telemedical platform has been developed on which it is possible to treat patients in their own homes. The platform consists of a videoconference part that allows the patients to make contact to qualified medical staff and a technology part that can transfer vital indicators of the patients health condition (lung function, oxygen saturation, pulse etc.)175 patients will be included with an expected drop-out of 20 % or 35 patients. The patients will be equally recruited from two hospitals (Frederiksberg and Herlev Hospital). All patients must have an exacerbation in their COPD that requires hospitalization to be included in this study. Each patient participate in the study for 6 months after discharge with follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months.

telemedicine

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of COPD stage III or IV according to GOLD guidelines
  • \>45 years of age
  • Compliant patient (is able to see, hear and follow instructions)
  • Estimated admission time \> 2 days

You may not qualify if:

  • X-score \> 4 at randomization(need of NIV or respirator)
  • severe overweight assessed by investigator
  • serious comorbidity (malignancy,unstable heart disease, dysregulated diabetes or other disease that makes participation impossible)
  • non-compliant patient (cannot follow simple instructions)
  • fever (\>38 degrees Celsius) at randomization point, in need of I.V. antibiotics assessed by investigator
  • participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Frederiksberg Hospital

Frederiksberg, 2000, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Jakobsen AS, Laursen LC, Ostergaard B, Rydahl-Hansen S, Phanareth KV. Hospital-admitted COPD patients treated at home using telemedicine technology in The Virtual Hospital Trial: methods of a randomized effectiveness trial. Trials. 2013 Sep 3;14:280. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-280.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Klaus V Phanareth, ass.professor

    Frederiksberg Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, ph.d, research leader

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2010

First Posted

July 2, 2010

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion

June 1, 2013

Study Completion

June 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 20, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations