NCT01154179

Brief Summary

During patients' stay in the hospital, some of the patients may require artificial feeding for various reasons either through a vein or through a tube going directly to the gut. However, the amount of feeding that can be considered 'adequate' is unclear due to lack of research data. The current evidence the investigators have suggests that doctors might be giving patients more than they require, which might carry some risks. This hasn't been proven until now and there is no evidence as yet to show investigators exactly how much the doctors should feed patients. The aim of the study is to see whether feeding patients less than what they are currently been feed is associated with better outcome. The patients will be randomly (like tossing a coin) allocated into 2 groups. One group will get 100% of the current amount; the second group will get 60%. The investigators will then compare the groups to decide if feeding patients less than the current practice is associated with better outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
93

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2009

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 30, 2010

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2012

Status Verified

September 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

June 29, 2010

Last Update Submit

September 4, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

permissive underfeedinghypocaloric feedingartificial nutrition

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Septic complication

    average of one week

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Inflammatory response

    average of one week

  • Metabolic response

    average of one week

  • Nutrition status

    average of one week

  • Systematic complications

    average of one week

  • Cost benefit analysis

    average of one week

Study Arms (1)

Normocaloric feeding

NO INTERVENTION

This control group will receive energy and protein intakes as recommended by the use of Schofield equations, as is current practice (100% of requirements)

Other: Hypocaloric feeding

Interventions

This intervention group will be prescribed 60% of recommended (by Schofield) requirements.

Normocaloric feeding

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients requiring artificial nutritional support in the hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Failure to obtain informed consent / assent from next of kin.
  • Patients at risk of refeeding syndrome.
  • If patients require concomitant enteral and parenteral nutrition.
  • Pregnant women and children under the age of 18 years.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Scarborough General Hospital

Scarborough, North Yorkshire, YO12 6QL, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Owais AE, Kabir SI, Mcnaught C, Gatt M, MacFie J. A single-blinded randomised clinical trial of permissive underfeeding in patients requiring parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2014 Dec;33(6):997-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 12.

Study Officials

  • Anwar E Owais, MBBS MRCSEd

    Scarborough General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Irfan Kabir, MRCS

    SCarborough General hopital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Marcel Gatt, MD

    Scarborough General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Claire Mcnaught, MD

    Scarborough General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • John Macfie, MD

    Scarborough General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Mr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2010

First Posted

June 30, 2010

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

September 5, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-09

Locations