NCT01151566

Brief Summary

Computed tomography (CT) scan, performed with contrast enhancement, is one of the most commonly requested examinations in diagnostic imaging. In a patient with an elevated creatinine or an allergy to contrast agents, the scan may be performed without the benefit of contrast enhancement. Ultrasound (US), performed with contrast agent enhancement does not have any nephrotoxicity and may be performed on patients with CT contrast allergy. The investigators propose that US with Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is superior to unenhanced CT scan in this population.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2010

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2010

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

June 8, 2010

Last Update Submit

March 11, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

UltrasoundContrast enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)NephrotoxicityCT contrast agents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Demonstration of superiority of US with CEUS over nonenhanced CT scan (NECT) for observations and interpretation of findings

    Superiority of US over nonenhanced CT scan will be shown in a blind read by independent interpretation of each study by two experienced radiologists. All positive observations and interpretations will be documented. A comparison will be performed against a truth panel based on a compilation of the patient's entire clinical record and outcome. We hypothesize CT will result in multiple indeterminate examinations, and that all solid organ pathology will be more optimally characterized on US with contrast enhancement than on CT. Multiple other observations will be equal between the two studies.

    January 31, 2011

Study Arms (2)

Renal Compromise

Those referred for CT scan with identified renal compromise necessitating use of no contrast agent

Sensitivity to CT Contrast Agents

Those referred for CT scan with prior demonstration of contrast sensitivity requiring use of no contrast

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 95 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients referred for unenhanced CT scan on the basis of renal compromise of CT contrast agent sensitivity will be eligible for recruitment for our study.

You may qualify if:

  • unenhanced CT scan of abdomen
  • known renal compromise
  • known hypersensitivity to CT contrast agents

You may not qualify if:

  • CT scan performed with contrast agent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Diagnostic Imaging Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada

Location

Study Officials

  • Stephanie R Wilson, MD

    Clinical Professor University of Calgary

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor of Radiology University of Calgary

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2010

First Posted

June 28, 2010

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

March 13, 2014

Record last verified: 2012-03

Locations