Can Ultrasound Replace Computed Tomography (CT) Scan in Those Unable to Have Computed Tomography (CT) Contrast Agents
CEUS_CT
Can US With CEUS Replace the Nonenhanced CT Scan in Patients With Contraindication to CT Contrast Agent
1 other identifier
observational
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Computed tomography (CT) scan, performed with contrast enhancement, is one of the most commonly requested examinations in diagnostic imaging. In a patient with an elevated creatinine or an allergy to contrast agents, the scan may be performed without the benefit of contrast enhancement. Ultrasound (US), performed with contrast agent enhancement does not have any nephrotoxicity and may be performed on patients with CT contrast allergy. The investigators propose that US with Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is superior to unenhanced CT scan in this population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2009
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedMarch 13, 2014
March 1, 2012
4.3 years
June 8, 2010
March 11, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Demonstration of superiority of US with CEUS over nonenhanced CT scan (NECT) for observations and interpretation of findings
Superiority of US over nonenhanced CT scan will be shown in a blind read by independent interpretation of each study by two experienced radiologists. All positive observations and interpretations will be documented. A comparison will be performed against a truth panel based on a compilation of the patient's entire clinical record and outcome. We hypothesize CT will result in multiple indeterminate examinations, and that all solid organ pathology will be more optimally characterized on US with contrast enhancement than on CT. Multiple other observations will be equal between the two studies.
January 31, 2011
Study Arms (2)
Renal Compromise
Those referred for CT scan with identified renal compromise necessitating use of no contrast agent
Sensitivity to CT Contrast Agents
Those referred for CT scan with prior demonstration of contrast sensitivity requiring use of no contrast
Eligibility Criteria
Patients referred for unenhanced CT scan on the basis of renal compromise of CT contrast agent sensitivity will be eligible for recruitment for our study.
You may qualify if:
- unenhanced CT scan of abdomen
- known renal compromise
- known hypersensitivity to CT contrast agents
You may not qualify if:
- CT scan performed with contrast agent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Foothills Medical Centrelead
- Lantheus Medical Imagingcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Diagnostic Imaging Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephanie R Wilson, MD
Clinical Professor University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor of Radiology University of Calgary
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2010
First Posted
June 28, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 13, 2014
Record last verified: 2012-03