Can TNF-Alpha Incomplete Secondary Responders Attain a Safe and Efficacious Response Switching to Cimzia
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
12
Brief Summary
Purpose of the study is to determine if Cimzia is safe and effective in subjects who have received previous treatment with a TNF-alpha inhibitor other than Cimzia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Jul 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 rheumatoid-arthritis
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 26, 2014
CompletedJune 9, 2014
May 1, 2014
1.5 years
June 17, 2010
February 3, 2014
May 29, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Decrease of Greater Than or Equal to 10 Points in the Cimzia Treatment Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 12
The Clinical Disease Activity (CDAI)is a composite score. Clinical Disease Activity (CDAI) = SJC(28): Swollen 28-Joint Count (shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCPs, PIPs (including thumb IP)+ TJC(28): Tender 28-Joint Count (shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCPs, PIPs (including thumb IP)+ PGA: Patient Global disease Activity (patient's self assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 0-10 where 10 is maximal activity)+ EGA: Evaluator's Global disease Activity (evaluator's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 0-10 where 10 is maximal activity) Remission: CDAI ≤ 2.8; Low Disease Activity: CDAI \> 2.8 and ≤ 10 ;Moderate Disease Activity: CDAI \> 10 and ≤ 22; High Disease Activity: CDAI \> 22. A CDAI reduction of 6.5 represents moderate improvement.
Baseline to week 12
Proportion of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria in the Cimzia Treatment Group Compared to the Placebo Group
ACR20 responders are subjects with at least 20% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-reactive protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale(VAS). HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - assessment of arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
From Baseline to Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria in the Cimzia Treatment Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 12
Baseline to Week 12
Proportion of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheuamtology Low Disease Activity Score and/or Remission Score in the Cimzia Group Compared to the Placebo Group as Calculated by DAS28 (CRP)
Baseline to Week 12
Proportion of Subjects Achieving a EULAR Good or Moderate Response Criteria in the Cimzia Treatment Group Compared to the Placebo Group
Baseline to week 12
Proportion of Subjects Achieving a CDAI Score Decrease Greater Than or Equal to 13.9 Points in the CimZia Treatment Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 12
Baseline to week 12
Other Outcomes (6)
Proportion of Subjects Achieving a CDAI Decrease of Greater Than or Equal to 10 Points in the Cimzia Treatment Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 24
Baseline to Week 24
Proportion of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria in the Cimzia Treatment Group Compared to the Placebo Group
Baseline to Week 24
Proportion of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria in the Cimzia Treatment Group Compared to the Placebo Group
Baseline to Week 24
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo (0.9% sodium chloride) given as 2 subcutaneous (sc) injections at weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed y 1 sc injection given an weeks 6, 8, and 10. At week 12 subjects entered the open label phase. Subjects received 400 mg of Cimzia (CZP) given as two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at weeks 12,14 and 16, followed by 1 sc injection at weeks 18, 20, and 22.
active treatment with Cimzia
ACTIVE COMPARATOR400 mg of Cimzia (CZP) given as two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by 1 sc injection at weeks 6, 8, and 10. At week 12 subjects entered the open label phase. Subjects received 400 mg of Cimzia (CZP) given as two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at weeks 12,14 and 16, followed by 1 sc injection at weeks 18, 20, and 22.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a diagnosis of RA at least 6 months
- Have received treatment with a TNF-alpha inhibitor
- Be receiving Methotrexate (with folic acid)at a dose of at least 10mg/week or another non-biologic DMARD if Methotrexate intolerant \*Have at least 6 tender joint and 6 swollen joints\*
- Have an CRP greater than or equal to ULN
- Availability of a chest x-ray that shows no evidence of active TB or infection
You may not qualify if:
- Prior exposure to Cimzia
- Prior treatment with B-cell depleting therapy
- No significant response to previous TNF inhibitor
- Congestive heart failure
- Clinically abnormal laboratory tests
- History of cancer
- Active TB
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Michael Schiff, MDlead
- UCB Pharmacollaborator
Study Sites (12)
Rheumatology Associates of N. Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, United States
Sun Valley Arthritis Center, Ltd.
Peoria, Arizona, 85381, United States
Arizona Arthritis and Rhematolgy Research
Phoenix, Arizona, 85037, United States
Sarasota Arthritis Research Center
Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States
Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516, United States
Westroads Medical Group
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Morristown Memorial Hospital
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960, United States
Buffalo Rheumatology
Orchard Park, New York, 14127, United States
Rheumatology Associates of Long Island
Smithtown, New York, 11787, United States
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States
Mountain State Clinical Research
Clarksburg, West Virginia, 26301, United States
Rheumatology and Immunotherapy Center
Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 53154, United States
Related Publications (1)
Schiff MH, von Kempis J, Goldblum R, Tesser JR, Mueller RB. Rheumatoid arthritis secondary non-responders to TNF can attain an efficacious and safe response by switching to certolizumab pegol: a phase IV, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, 12-week study, followed by a 12-week open-label phase. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Dec;73(12):2174-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205325. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
PMID: 24972708RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael schiff
- Organization
- michael schiff
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Michael H Schiff, MD
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDIV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2010
First Posted
June 22, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 9, 2014
Results First Posted
March 26, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-05