Bioequivalence Study of Rivastigmine 1.5 mg Capsules Under Fasting Conditions
1 other identifier
interventional
44
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This is a bioequivalence study of Rivastigmine 1.5 mg capsules and Exelon Administered as 1.5 mg capsule in Healthy subjects under fasting conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 healthy
Started Jan 2004
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 healthy
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2010
CompletedJanuary 13, 2012
June 1, 2010
1 month
February 10, 2010
January 12, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bioequivalence based on Cmax and AUC parameters
2 months
Study Arms (2)
Rivastigmine
EXPERIMENTALRivastigmine capsules 1.5 mg of Dr.Reddy's Laboratories Limited
Exelon
ACTIVE COMPARATORExelon 1.5 mg capsules of Novartis
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects enrolled in this study will be members of the community at large.
- The recruitment advertisements may use various media types (e.g. radio, newspaper, Anapharm Web site, Anapharm volunteers' database). Subjects must meet all of the following criteria in order to be included in the study:
- Male or female, smoker or non-smoker, 18 years of age and older.
- Capable of consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects to whom any of the following applies will be excluded from the study:
- Clinically significant illnesses within 4 weeks prior to the administration of the study medication.
- Clinically significant surgery within 4 weeks prior to the administration of the study medication.
- Any clinically significant abnormality found during medical screening.
- Any reason which, in the opinion of the Medical Sub-Investigator, would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
- Abnormal laboratory tests judged clinically significant.
- Positive testing for hepatitis H, hepatitis C, or HN at screening.
- BCG abnormalities (clinically significant) or vital sign abnormalities (systolic blood pressure lower than 90 or over 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure lower than 50 or over 90 mmHg, or heart rate less than 50 or over 100 bpm) at screening.
- BMI2: 30.0.
- History of significant alcohol abuse within six months prior to the screening visit or any indication of the regular use of more than fourteen units of alcohol per week (l Unit = 150 mL of wine, 360 mL of beer, or 45 mL of 40% alcohol).
- History of drug abuse or use of illegal drugs: use of soft drugs (such as marijuana) within 3 months prior to the screening visit or hard drugs (such as cocaine, phencyclidine \[PCP\] and crack) within 1 year prior to the screening visit or positive urine drug screen at screening.
- History of allergic reactions to rivastigmine or other related drugs.
- History of allergic reactions to heparin.
- Use of any drugs known to induce or inhibit hepatic drug metabolism (examples of inducers: barbiturates, carbamazepine, phenytoin, glucocorticoids, rifampin/rifabutin; examples of inhibitors: antidepressants, cimetidine, diltiazem, erythromycin, ketoconazole, MAO inhibitors, neuroleptics, verapamil, quinidine)within 30 days prior to administration of the study medication.
- Use of an investigational drug or participation in an investigational study within 30 days prior to administration of the study medication.
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Larouche, M.D
Anapharm Inc, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2010
First Posted
June 17, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2004
Primary Completion
February 1, 2004
Study Completion
February 1, 2004
Last Updated
January 13, 2012
Record last verified: 2010-06