Trial to Evaluate Single- and Double- Freeze Cryotherapy in the Prevention of Cervical Neoplasia
Randomised Intervention Trial to Evaluate Single- and Double- Freeze Cryotherapy in the Prevention of Cervical Neoplasia
1 other identifier
interventional
440
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate whether single- and double-freeze cryotherapy techniques have similar efficacy in controlling different grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and have similar side effects and complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedMay 1, 2018
April 1, 2018
5 years
June 16, 2010
April 27, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary end point is the cure rate at the end of one year
The primary end point is the cure rate at the end of one year by comparing between two different techniques of cryotherapy i.e. single freeze and double freeze.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary end points are the rates and the types of side effects and complications
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Single-freeze cryotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm 1 Single-freeze technique; 3 minutes of freeze and 5 minutes of thaw.
Double-freeze cryotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm 2 Double-freeze technique: 3 minutes of freeze and 5 minutes of thaw and cycle repeated once again.
Interventions
Arm 1 Single-freeze technique; 3 minutes of freeze and 5 minutes of thaw. Arm 2 Double-freeze technique: 3 minutes of freeze and 5 minutes of thaw and cycle repeated once again.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histological confirmation of ASCUS -H, CIN I, CIN II and CIN III lesions.
- The lesion confined to ecto cervix only.
- No obvious cervical and vaginal infection.
- Women in proliferative phase of menstrual cycle or post menopausal cases.
- Negative endo cervical curettage.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tata Memorial Hospital
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gauravi A MIshra, MD
Tata Memorial Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sharmila A Pimple, MD
Tata Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor Department of Preventive Oncology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2010
First Posted
June 17, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04