Multiple Dose Safety and Efficacy Study Evaluating CNS 7056 Versus Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
A Phase IIb Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Doses of CNS 7056 Compared to Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
162
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this dose-response study is to assess the safety and efficacy of CNS 7056 compared with midazolam to maintain suitable sedation levels in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started May 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 8, 2019
CompletedJanuary 8, 2019
December 1, 2018
4 months
May 27, 2010
December 14, 2018
December 14, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success Rates of the Procedure
Success of the procedure is a composite endpoint consisting of: Modified Observer's Assessment for Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores ≤4 on three consecutive measurements after administration of study drug AND completion of the endoscopy procedure AND no requirement for rescue sedative medication AND no requirement for manual or mechanical ventilation
From start of study drug injection to patient discharge
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time to Fully Alert
From last injection of double-blind study medication until fully alert criteria are reached
Time to Ready for Discharge
After the Last Injection of Double-Blind Study Medication AND after end of colonoscopy until first of 3 consecutive Aldrete scores ≥ 9
Study Arms (4)
A. Remimazolam (CNS 7056)
EXPERIMENTALInitial 8 mg iv for sedation induction, and 3 mg iv top-ups for sedation maintenance. Fentanyl pre-treatment: up to 100 μg (at the discretion of the investigator) and 25 μg top-up doses.
B. Remimazolam (CNS 7056)
EXPERIMENTALInitial 7 mg iv for sedation induction, and 2 mg iv top-ups for sedation maintenance. Fentanyl pre-treatment: up to 100 μg (at the discretion of the investigator) and 25 μg top-up doses.
C. Remimazolam (CNS 7056)
EXPERIMENTALInitial 5 mg iv for sedation induction, and 3 mg iv top-ups for sedation maintenance. Fentanyl pre-treatment: up to 100 μg (at the discretion of the investigator) and 25 μg top-up doses.
D. Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitial 2.5 mg iv for sedation induction, and 1 mg iv top-ups for sedation maintenance. Fentanyl pre-treatment: up to 100 μg (at the discretion of the investigator) and 25 μg top-up doses
Interventions
Initial low dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
Initial intermediate dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
Initial high dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
Initial standardized dose plus supplemental doses as necessary.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients, aged 18 to 70 years inclusive, scheduled to undergo a standard colonoscopy.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Score I, II, or III.
- Weight range 55 to 130 kg inclusive.
- Body mass index (BMI) range 18 to 33 kg/m2 inclusive
- Patients of child-bearing potential and their partners must have been willing to use adequate contraception such as an intrauterine device, diaphragm or condom during the study and until 1 month after the last study drug administration. Childbearing potential was defined as "all patients unless they were a female post menopausal for at least 2 years, or were surgically sterile."
- Patient voluntarily signed and dated an ICF that was approved by an IRB prior to the conduct of any study procedure.
- Patient was willing and able to comply with study requirements and return for a Follow up Visit (Day 4 ± 3 day) after the colonoscopy.
You may not qualify if:
- Expected duration of colonoscopy \> 30 minutes.
- Patients with a suspected or diagnosed pathology of the lower GI tract that would have added to the risk of colonoscopy, such as strictures, active inflammatory bowel disease.
- ASA III patients with history of sleep apnea.
- ASA III patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2).
- Patients with evidence of uncontrolled renal, hepatic, central nervous system, respiratory, cardiovascular or metabolic dysfunction, or other clinically significant (CS) findings at screening that, in the investigator's or medical monitor's opinion, should have excluded them from the study.
- Patients with clinically significant abnormalities in 12 lead ECG recorded at screening.
- Female patients with a positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) pregnancy test at screening or baseline.
- Lactating female patients.
- Patients with positive drugs of abuse screen at baseline.
- Patients with positive serum ethanol at baseline.
- Patient with a history of drug or ethanol abuse.
- Patients in receipt of any investigational drug within 30 days or less than 7 half lives (whichever was longer) before the start of the study, or scheduled to receive one during the study period.
- Patients with a known sensitivity to benzodiazepines, flumazenil, opioids, naloxone, or a medical condition such that these agents were contraindicated.
- Patients with an inability to communicate well with the investigator.
- Patients in whom management of airway was judged to be difficult due to, e.g., thyro-mental distance ≤ 4 cm ("short neck"), or Mallampati score of 4.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Paion UK Ltd.lead
- Premier Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (9)
Helen Keller Hospital
Sheffield, Alabama, 35660, United States
HOPE Research Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85050, United States
ACRI Phase I LLC
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Advanced Clinical Research Associates
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Miami Research Associates
South Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794, United States
Wake Research Associates
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Options Health Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104, United States
Charlottesville Medical Research
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22911, United States
Related Publications (1)
Pambianco DJ, Borkett KM, Riff DS, Winkle PJ, Schwartz HI, Melson TI, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):984-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.062. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
PMID: 26363333RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Trial Information
- Organization
- PAION UK Ltd
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2010
First Posted
June 16, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 8, 2019
Results First Posted
January 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-12