NCT01144858

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine whether left atrial appendage flow velocity, as determined using trans esophageal echocardiography (TEE), predicts the outcome after catheter ablation of persistent Atrial fibrillation( pAF).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2009

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 15, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 16, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

June 16, 2010

Status Verified

October 1, 2008

First QC Date

June 15, 2010

Last Update Submit

June 15, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

atrial fibrillationablation catheterleft atrial appendage peak emptying velocitytool for predicting successful catheter ablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • termination of persistent AF by catheter ablation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Recurrences of AF were therefore determined from holter monitoring at 3 and 6 months or 12 leads ECG in care of symptomatic palpitation with clinical interview.

Study Arms (1)

patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ablation

Other: a complete transesophageal echocardiography

Interventions

All patients were evaluated by a complete transesophageal echocardiography with multiplane probes with a 7-MHz transducer before catheter ablation .LA appendage flow was obtained by placing the pulsed Doppler sample volume at the orifice of the LA appendage, after which peak flow velocities were measured and averaged within each RR interval of 10 consecutive cardiac cycles

patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ablation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

40 consecutive patients who underwent first-time radiofrequency catheter ablation for pAF. pAF was defined as continuous AF lasting longer than 1 month, resistant to either electrical or pharmacological cardioversion

You may qualify if:

  • First-time radiofrequency catheter ablation for pAF. pAF was defined as continuous AF lasting longer than 1 month, resistant to either electrical or pharmacological cardioversion.
  • Informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe valvular disease requiring surgery
  • Valvular prosthesis
  • Known severe coronary artery disease
  • Atrial and/or ventricular thrombosis
  • New York Heart Association functional class III to IV
  • Cerebrovascular disease
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Latent or manifest hyperthyroidism

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinique Pasteur

Toulouse, 43-45 Avenue de Lombez, 31076, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Combes S, Jacob S, Combes N, Karam N, Chaumeil A, Guy-Moyat B, Treguer F, Deplagne A, Boveda S, Marijon E, Albenque JP. Predicting favourable outcomes in the setting of radiofrequency catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a pilot study assessing the value of left atrial appendage peak flow velocity. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Jan;106(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2010

First Posted

June 16, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Study Completion

December 1, 2009

Last Updated

June 16, 2010

Record last verified: 2008-10

Locations