NCT01141816

Brief Summary

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an increasingly popular therapy option for treating small kidney cancer, especially for patients who are not ideal candidates for traditional surgery. Currently, follow-up after this procedure involves the patient having several CT scans (or MRI scans in some cases) over time to monitor for possible cancer recurrence. However, there are risks associated with the radiation exposure from CT scans and other risks, such as adverse events from the contrast media used in these scans. This study will therefore investigate whether a different technique, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), can be an effective tool for follow-up monitoring of kidney cancer patients who have undergone RFA by comparing the results of their standard follow-up CT scans (or MRIs if applicable) with the results of CEUS. If CEUS is found to be just as effective as CT scans or MRIs in detecting kidney cancer recurrence, this technique could potentially become the new standard of care for follow-up.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 9, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2010

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6.9 years

First QC Date

June 9, 2010

Last Update Submit

December 14, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

renal cell carcinomaradiofrequency ablationcontrast enhanced ultrasoundmonitoringfollow up

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Sensitivity value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/MRI.

    The accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in monitoring renal lesions post-radiofrequency ablation will be assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/ MRI.

    3 months post radiofrequency ablation procedure.

  • Sensitivity value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/MRI.

    The accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in monitoring renal lesions post-radiofrequency ablation will be assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/ MRI.

    6 months post radiofrequency ablation procedure.

  • Sensitivity value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/MRI.

    The accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in monitoring renal lesions post-radiofrequency ablation will be assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/ MRI.

    12 months post radiofrequency ablation procedure.

  • Sensitivity value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/MRI.

    The accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in monitoring renal lesions post-radiofrequency ablation will be assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/ MRI.

    18 months post radiofrequency ablation procedure.

  • Sensitivity value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/MRI.

    The accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in monitoring renal lesions post-radiofrequency ablation will be assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of CEUS for tumour recurrence and by comparing to the standard CT/ MRI.

    24 months post radiofrequency ablation procedure.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Quality of life data

    3 months post radiofrequency ablation

  • Quality of life data

    6 months post radiofrequency ablation

  • Quality of life data

    12 months post radiofrequency ablation

  • Quality of life data

    18 months post radiofrequency ablation

  • Quality of life data

    24 months post radiofrequency ablation

Study Arms (1)

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Interventions

Contrast-enhanced ultrasounds of the kidney will be performed within 7 days of routine CTs or MRIs at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-radiofrequency ablation, with Perflutren Lipid Microsphere Injectible Suspension ('Definity') as the contrast agent.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • at least 18 years of age and capable of giving informed consent
  • patient undergoing CT of MRI for monitoring of renal lesions after radiofrequency ablation

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnant patients
  • patients with allergies to iodinated contrast agents
  • patients with pulmonary hypertension, right-to-left cardiac shunts, or unstable cardiopulmonary disease (these are absolute or relative contraindications to the use of the ultrasound contrast agent, perflutren lipid microsphere)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St. Joseph's Healthcare

Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsKidney NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Anil Kapoor, MD, FRCSC

    McMaster University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
The radiologist is blinded to either CEUS or CT/MRI.
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, FRCSC

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2010

First Posted

June 11, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2021

Study Completion

January 1, 2022

Last Updated

December 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-12

Locations