NCT01140152

Brief Summary

Many patients with intestinal failure require intestinal transplantation for survival. Currently, the gold standard for diagnosing acute cellular rejection (ACR) is histological examination of endoscopic biopsies, which are taken invasively and lack sensitivity. A non-invasive method of monitoring for ACR is needed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
17

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2008

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2008

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2009

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 7, 2010

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

intestinal transplantationrejectionproteomicsinnate immunity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate levels of proteins and cytokines in ostomy effluent during episodes of rejection

    Protocol biopsies of the transplanted intestine are obtained during endoscopy and when clinical symptoms indicating abnormal allograft function are present. Biopsies were sent to pathology, where the pathologist determined if there was acute rejection. Ostomy effluent taken during times of endoscopy were subjected to MALDI and Luminex technology to look for any proteins or cytokines differentially expressed during rejection.

    first 8 weeks post transplant

Study Arms (2)

No rejection

Intestinal transplant recipients with no evidence of biopsy proven rejection

Rejection

Intestinal transplant recipients who had evidence of biopsy proven rejection

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All Intestinal transplant recipients at UCLA, who are up to 8 weeks status-post transplant and are undergoing surveillance endoscopy or who present with elevated stool outputs with concern for acute rejection. Controls will consist of all primary ITx recipients of the same follow-up criteria who are undergoing surveillance biopsies but are at their baseline ostomy outputs.

You may qualify if:

  • Intestinal transplant recipient
  • Less than 8 weeks post transplant

You may not qualify if:

  • Intestinal transplant recipients more than 8 weeks post transplant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UCLA

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

Ostomy effluent

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rejection, Psychology

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Social BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Anjuli R Kumar, M.D.

    University of California, Los Angeles

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2010

First Posted

June 9, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion

September 1, 2009

Study Completion

September 1, 2009

Last Updated

April 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2010-02

Locations