The Canadian UnRuptured Endovascular Versus Surgery Trial (CURES)
CURES
Canadian Study on the Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Versus Surgical Treatment. A Randomized Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Results of Intracranial Aneurysms
2 other identifiers
observational
291
3 countries
6
Brief Summary
Purpose: Phase 1: (Pilot Phase) To compare the treatment efficacy of surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. To obtain better estimates of morbidity and mortality related to a surgical or endovascular treatment strategy at one year within the context of an RCT. To show that an RCT comparing the morbidity and mortality of a surgical management strategy to an endovascular management strategy is feasible. Phase 2: To compare the results of surgical and endovascular management strategies, in terms of:
- 1.Overall mortality and morbidity at 1 and 5 years.
- 2.The clinical efficacy and safety of a surgical or endovascular management strategy at 1 and 5 years
- 3.Surgical clipping of intradural, saccular, unruptured intracranial aneurysms is superior to endovascular management in terms of a lesser number of patients experiencing treatment failure.
- 4.An RCT comparing the clinical outcomes of a surgical versus endovascular management strategy is feasible.
- 5.Treatment failure, hereby defined as having occurred when either: the intended initial modality (surgical or endovascular) fails to occlude the aneurysm, a "major" (saccular) angiographic aneurysm recurrence is found, or an intracranial hemorrhagic event occurs during the 1-year follow-up period. Phase 1 Secondary End-points:
- 6.Overall morbidity and mortality at one year.
- 7.Occurrence of morbidity (mRS \>2) or mortality following treatment.
- 8.Occurrence of failure of aneurysm occlusion using the initial intended treatment modality.
- 9.Occurrence of a "major" (saccular) angiographic aneurysm recurrence.
- 10.Occurrence of an intracranial hemorrhage following treatment.
- 11.Peri-treatment hospitalization lasting more than 5 days
- 12.Discharge following treatment to a location other than home
- 13.One management strategy is superior to the other in terms of clinical outcome at five years.
- 14.One management strategy is superior to the other in terms of clinical efficacy at five years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 26, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 6, 2023
July 1, 2023
12 years
June 2, 2010
July 4, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment failure
Defined as having occurred when either: the intended initial modality (surgical or endovascular) fails to occlude the aneurysm, a "major" (saccular) angiographic aneurysm recurrence is found, or an intracranial hemorrhagic event occurs during the 1-year follow-up period.
One Year
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Morbidity and mortality: 2. Hospitalization >5 days : physician reporting. 3. Discharge other than to home: physician reporting.
one year
Occurrence of morbidity (mRS >2) or mortality following treatment.
6 weeks post-treatment
Failure of aneurysm occlusion
1 year
Occurrence of a "major" (saccular) angiographic aneurysm recurrence.
1 year
Occurrence of an intracranial hemorrhage
1 year
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Surgical management
Surgical clipping will be performed within 6 weeks of randomization, according to standards of practice, and under general anaesthesia. Aneurysms thought by the treating physicians to require deliberate permanent proximal vessel occlusion, bypasses, and other flow-redirecting treatments that do not directly clip the aneurysm will not be included.
Endovascular management
Endovascular treatment will be performed within 6 weeks of randomization, according to standards of practice, and under general anaesthesia. Details regarding type of coils, use of adjunctive techniques such as balloon-remodeling or stents, as well as post-treatment medical management issues, will be left up to the physician performing the endovascular treatment.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
primary care clinic
You may qualify if:
- Patients at least 18 years of age with at least 10 years of remaining life expectancy
- At least one documented, intradural, saccular intracranial aneurysm
- The patient and aneurysm are considered appropriate for either surgical or endovascular treatment by the treating team
- Aneurysm size 3-25 mm
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any intracranial hemorrhage, including SAH, within the previous 30 days
- Lesion characteristics not readily suitable for either endovascular or surgical treatment, in the opinion of the physician(s) intending to treat the aneurysm
- Multiple aneurysms, where the treatment plan includes both surgical clipping as well as endovascular coiling
- Aneurysm anticipated (pre-operatively) to require proximal vessel occlusion, a bypass, or other flow-redirecting therapy (such as flow-diverting stents) as part of treatment plan
- Patients with baseline mRS \>2
- Patients with a single cavernous aneurysm
- Patients with dissecting, fusiform, or mycotic aneurysms
- Patients with AVM-associated aneurysms
- Pregnant patients (randomization (and treatment) may be delayed until after delivery)
- Patients with absolute contraindications to anaesthesia, endovascular treatment or administration of contrast material, including low-osmolarity agents or gadolinium
- Patients unable to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Liège
Liège, Belgium
Foothills Medical Center
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal - CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0C1, Canada
CHRU de Lille
Lille, France
Related Publications (1)
Naggara O, Darsaut T, Trystram D, Tselikas L, Raymond J. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: why we must not perpetuate the impasse for another 25 years. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):537-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70091-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 24849854DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tim Darsaut, MD
University of Alberta
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean Raymond, MD
Université de Montréal
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2010
First Posted
June 9, 2010
Study Start
September 26, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07