Resistance Training in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD): Whole Body Vibration Versus Conventional Resistance Training
REWORK
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pulmonary rehabilitation has been emerged as a recommended standard of care for patients with chronic lung disease based on a growing body of scientific evidence. A set of evidence-based guidelines were published in American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR). Since then, the published literature in pulmonary rehabilitation has increased substantially, and other societies have published important statements about pulmonary rehabilitation (eg, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society). In patients with COPD, there is a strong scientific basis for implementing conventional resistance training (CRT) in addition to endurance training. Endurance training, such as walking, is a key component of pulmonary rehabilitation and improves in exercise tolerance and muscular endurance. However, this type of training may not reverse muscle weakness or atrophy. For that reason, strength training seems to be the optimum training modality to increase muscle mass and strength. Recently, Whole-Body-Vibration (WBV) training has been promoted as an alternative for resistance training on multigym equipment. In WBV training, the subject stands on a platform that generates vertical sinusoidal vibration, during which static and dynamic exercises can be performed. The present study is conducted to provide an answer on the following question: will a resistance training program, such as the whole body vibration, be even effective than a conventional resistance training program in patients with COPD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2011
CompletedDecember 12, 2011
December 1, 2011
1.2 years
June 2, 2010
December 9, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
estimation of the change of 6 MWD before and after 12 weeks resistance training program (CRT versus WBV training)
estimation of the change of 6 MWD (submaximal walking test)after a 12 week conventional resistance training program or after a 12 week whole body vibration training program
before and after 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
changes in muscle strength (quadriceps force)after CRT or after WBV training in patients with COPD
before and after 12 weeks
changes in body composition after CRT or after WBV training in patients with COPD
before and after 12 weeks
changes in maximal exercise capacity after CRT or after WBV training in patients with COPD
before and after 12 weeks
changes in muscle force after CRT or after WBV training in patients with COPD
before and after 12 weeks
changes in Quality of life after CRT or after WBV training in patients with COPD
beforer and after 12 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional training
ACTIVE COMPARATORWhole body vibration training
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Conventional resistance training program is followed.
WBV training on FITVIBE
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with COPD candidate for pulmonary rehabilitation
- Men and female between 40 and 80 years of age
- Written informed consent to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cardiac, neurological and orthopedic co-morbidity interfering with exercise training.
- Pacemaker
- Hip, knee of shoulder prosthesis or recently introduced spirals, metal pens, bolts or plates
- Uncontrolled diabetes, epilepsy or migraine
- Osteoporotic or metastatic fractures, acute hernia, discopathy, spondylitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Salhi B, Malfait TJ, Van Maele G, Joos G, van Meerbeeck JP, Derom E. Effects of Whole Body Vibration in Patients With COPD. COPD. 2015;12(5):525-32. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2015.1008693. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
PMID: 26457458DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Derom, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2010
First Posted
June 3, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
November 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 12, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12