Study in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With PAR (Perennial Allergic Rhinitis)
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of BDP HFA Nasal Aerosol (320 Mcg, Once Daily) in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR) in Adult and Adolescent Subjects (12 Years of Age and Older)
1 other identifier
interventional
474
1 country
35
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of an investigational nasal aerosol compared with placebo nasal aerosol in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
35 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 23, 2012
CompletedMay 23, 2012
April 1, 2012
5 months
May 27, 2010
April 23, 2012
April 23, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Six-week Treatment Period
Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) over the past 12 hours twice daily (AM \& PM) using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, awareness, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities and/or sleeping). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.
Baseline (Days -3 to 0) and Days 1-43 (6-week Treatment Period)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Six-week Treatment Period
Baseline (Days -3 to 0) and Days 1-43 (6-week Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)
Baseline and Week 6
Study Arms (2)
BDP HFA 320 µg/day
EXPERIMENTALDuring the 6-week double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered 4 actuations (two per nostril) of 80 µg BDP HFA once daily.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORDuring the 6-week double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered four actuations (two per nostril) of placebo HFA once daily.
Interventions
Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) Nasal Aerosol
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed Consent
- Documented history of perennial allergic rhinitis
- A demonstrated sensitivity to at least one allergen known to induce PAR through a standard skin prick test.
- Minimum subject-reported reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) of at least 6 (out of a possible 12)
- Other criteria apply
You may not qualify if:
- History of physical findings of nasal pathology (within 60 days prior to screening visit)
- Participation in any investigational drug study 30 days preceding screening visit
- History of respiratory infection/disorder with 14 days preceding screening visit or during the run-in period
- Use of any prohibited concomitant medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (35)
Teva Clinical Study Site
Los Angeles, California, 90025, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
San Jose, California, 95117, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Miami, Florida, 33173, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Lilburn, Georgia, 30047, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46208, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Bangor, Maine, 04401, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Rolla, Missouri, 65401, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Brick, New Jersey, 08724, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Canton, Ohio, 44718, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Medford, Oregon, 97504, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Portland, Oregon, 97213, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, 19422, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Upland, Pennsylvania, 19013, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Austin, Texas, 78731, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76132, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Katy, Texas, 77450, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
New Braunfels, Texas, 78130, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78829, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Waco, Texas, 76712, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Newport News, Virginia, 23606, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23233, United States
Teva Clinical Study Site
Bellevue, Washington, 68123, United States
Related Publications (6)
Meltzer EO, Jacobs RL, LaForce CF, Dorinsky PM, Kelley L, Dunbar SA, Tantry SK (2011). BDP HFA Nasal Aerosol 320 µg Once Daily Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Nasal Symptoms Associated With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 107(11):A118.
RESULTMeltzer EO, Jacobs RL, LaForce CF, Dorinsky PM, Kelley L, Dunbar SA, Tantry SK. . BDP HFA Nasal Aerosol 320 µg Once Daily Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Nasal Symptoms Associated With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol (Supplement); 107(11):A118 - Poster presentation.
RESULTCarr W, Meltzer EO, Finn A, Dorinsky PM, Kelley L, Dunbar SA, Tantry SK. Effective nasal symptom relief and improvement in health-related quality of life in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis following 6-week
RESULTMeltzer EO, Korenblat PE, Lanier BQ, Kelley L, Tantry SK. Beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol with an integrated dose counter: functionality and performance. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):534-41. doi: 10.2500/aap.2013.34.3707.
PMID: 24169062DERIVEDNayak AS, Atiee GJ, Dige E, Maloney J, Nolte H. Safety of ragweed sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablets in adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):404-10. doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3605.
PMID: 23026182DERIVEDMeltzer EO, Jacobs RL, LaForce CF, Kelley CL, Dunbar SA, Tantry SK. Safety and efficacy of once-daily treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):249-57. doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3571.
PMID: 22737708DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Research
- Organization
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sudeesh Tantry, Ph.D.
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2010
First Posted
June 2, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 23, 2012
Results First Posted
May 23, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-04