Motivational Interviewing for Medication Adherence in Asthma
Impact of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention on Medication Adherence in Patients With Asthma
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The high burden of asthma appears to be related to poor asthma control, which is associated with more frequent asthma symptoms, greater bronchodilator use and functional impairment, and worse pulmonary function. Despite the availability of effective treatments, more than 58% of asthmatics are poorly controlled. Daily adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens is considered by experts to be one of the most important behavioral factors linked to achieving optimal asthma control. However, there is a paucity of research on interventions specifically designed to improve ICS adherence among adult asthmatics. The vast majority of intervention studies to date used atheoretical interventions to target behavior change, relying mainly upon educational approaches which have been criticised for "failing to translate knowledge into action." This may be due to the fact that most education-based approaches do not specifically address or help patients overcome ambivalence about behavior change, which is necessary for ensuring daily adherence. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a client-centred intervention that focuses on enhancing intrinsic motivation to change a particular behavior, and exploring and resolving ambivalence about behavior change. Brief MI sessions (e.g., 1-5 x 15-30 minute sessions) have been shown to improve a variety of health behaviors (e.g., reduce alcohol consumption, improve dietary habits, increase exercise behaviour, and improve medication adherence) and health outcomes (reduce blood pressure, body mass index, and cholesterol levels). However, no studies to date have assessed the efficacy of using MI to improve ICS adherence in asthmatics. This study aims to assess the efficacy of using MI to improve daily medication (ICS) adherence in a sample of poorly controlled, non-adherent asthmatics. It is hypothesized that patients randomized to the MI condition will exhibit significantly improved ICS adherence at 6 and 12-months post-intervention, independent of baseline levels and covariates, relative to patients randomized to the usual care control condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 asthma
Started Jun 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_3 asthma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedFebruary 13, 2018
July 1, 2015
4.8 years
May 27, 2010
February 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Inhaled corticosteroid adherence
measured according to the following validated equation: # of treatment days (based on the # of canisters filled at the pharmacy x the duration of each prescription) divided by the # of prescription days (# of days the patient is expected to be taking his/her medication)
12 months post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Inhaled corticosteroid adherence
6 months post-intervention
Asthma Control Questionnaire (Juniper)
12 months post-intervention, with preliminary data collected at 6 months
Asthma Control Test
12 months post-intervention, with preliminary data collected at 6 months
Asthma Self-Efficacy Scale (Tobin)
12 months post-intervention, with preliminary data collected at 6 months
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Juniper)
12 months post-intervention, with preliminary data collected at 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Usual care
PLACEBO COMPARATORStandard medical care within 4-6 week period
Motivational interviewing
EXPERIMENTALBrief MI sessions within 4-6 week period
Interventions
Brief MI 3x30 minute sessions within 4-6 week period
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients 18 years and older
- Primary diagnosis of moderate-severe persistent asthma (as per GINA)
- Prescribed inhaled corticosteroid medication (min dose of 250 µg fluticasone equivalent per day) for at least 12 consecutive months
- Uncontrolled asthma (≤ 19 on the Asthma Control Test)
- Covered by a drug insurance plan (e.g., RAMQ)
- Non-adherent to ICS medication (based on having filled less than 30% of their prescriptions over the last year)
- Able to speak English or French.
You may not qualify if:
- Any other medical condition that confers greater illness morbidity than asthma (e.g., active cancer)
- Severe psychopathology (e.g., schizophrenia)
- Apparent cognitive or language deficit
- Are or plan to become pregnant or move outside of Quebec over the course of the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kim L Lavoie, PhD
Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Co-PI, PI is Dr. Kim Lavoie
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2010
First Posted
May 28, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2015-07