Strategies for Improving Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) Prescription Associated to Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background Despite the low prevalence of serious complications associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use, there is a widespread use of gastroprotective proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in order to prevent adverse effects. Inappropriate prescribing of PPIs includes overprescribing for inappropriate indications and the misuse of first choice in their class in terms of efficacy, safety and cost. A series of recommendations, based on the best available scientific evidence, has been established to justify prophylaxis with PPIs associated to NSAIDs. Therefore, there is the need to encourage the incorporation of this knowledge to guide decisions of physicians with the objective of improving patient health and sustainability of the Public Health Service. Although since long ago there is a great concern regarding rational use of drugs, the available evidence for the most appropriate strategies to improve prescribing is scarce. Passive dissemination of research findings are generally ineffective and at best result in small changes in practice. Multifaceted intervention targeting different barriers to change are more likely to be effective than single intervention. Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two educational multifaceted strategies aimed at improving PPIs prescription associated to NSAIDs use in primary care. We will also compare the cost-effectiveness of such strategies. Hypothesis It is hypothesized that a quality improvement intervention directed to primary care physicians will decrease inappropriate PPIs prescriptions associated to NSAIDs prescription. Methodology A three-arm prospective quasi-randomized controlled trial will test the effectiveness of two strategies for improving PPI prescription associated to NSAID in primary care context. Three of the Canary Islands will be selected and randomized to either a experimental multifaceted intervention (group education+audit-feedback+CCDSS) group, a experimental multifaceted intervention (audit-feedback+CCDSS) group, or a control group (usual intervention). From each of these islands, 6-8 primary care centers will be randomly selected to received the intervention practices. All family physicians working at each randomly selected primary care center were mandatorily included. Primary outcome measure is reduction of inappropriate PPI prescription. The efficacy of the intervention will be examined within a 3, 6 and a 12 month follow up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 14, 2012
September 1, 2012
1.8 years
May 20, 2010
September 13, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of inappropriate PPI prescriptions
Change in the proportion of inappropriate PPI prescription associated with NSAID prescription
one year
Study Arms (3)
Multifaceted intervention 1
EXPERIMENTALpsycho-educational workshop + audit-feedback + computer-based clinical decision support system (CCDSS) + usual intervention
Multifaceted intervention 2
EXPERIMENTALaudit-feedback + computer-based clinical decision support system (CCDSS) + usual intervention
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORusual intervention
Interventions
Psycho-educational group workshop: two theory-practice sessions on both evidence-based guidelines on PPI-NSAID prescription and communication and negotiation skills to deal with patients. All participants will fill out an initial questionnaire concerning prescribing patterns and barriers to appropriate prescription. All attendees will be given a reminder printed material designed to give the necessary information in a brief fashion and for maximal visual impact. Audit-Feedback: participants will receive, monthly and by e-mail, an individualized report with data of their own appropriate/inappropriate PPI prescriptions and avoidable costs. CCDSS: interactive computer program designed to assist physicians with decision making when prescribing PPI associated to NSAID. It consists in pop-up alert screens that aim to influence prescription choice according to each patient characteristics and evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Audit-Feedback: participants will receive, monthly and by e-mail, an individualized report with data of their own appropriate/inappropriate PPI prescriptions and avoidable costs CCDSS: interactive computer program designed to assist physicians with decision making when prescribing PPI associated to NSAID. It consists in pop-up alert screens that aim to influence prescription choice according to each patient characteristics and evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Usual intervention includes: Compulsory attendance both to courses (10-12 hours) and to short sessions (around 30 min.) on the rational use of drugs held in groups and during working hours. Each primary care physician attends to 1-2 courses and 3-4 short sessions per year. Every three months, physicians receive a feedback paper with information on his/her own prescribing overall costs comparing to his/her primary care center average cost. Distribution of a printed booklet of recommendations, delivered personally or through mass mailings, on the prescribing of PPI-NSAID.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary care physicians
You may not qualify if:
- Participating as a subject in any other clinical research study
- Have received any other intervention on the subject within the last 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Servicio de Evaluación. Servicio Canario de Salud
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38004, Spain
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pedro G Serrano-Aguilar, MD, PhD
Servicio de Evaluación. Servicio Canario de Salud
- STUDY CHAIR
Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña, BSc Statist
Fundación Canaria de Investigación y Salud
- STUDY CHAIR
Maria M Trujillo-Martín, PhD
Fundación Canaria de Investigación y Salud
- STUDY CHAIR
Melany Worbes-Cerezo, BAEcon
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
- STUDY CHAIR
Renata Linertova, BA Econ
Fundación Canaria de Investigación y Salud
- STUDY CHAIR
Francisco J Hernández-Diaz, MD, PhD
Servicio Canario de Salud
- STUDY CHAIR
Miguel A Hernández-Rodríguez, MD, PhD
Servicio Canario de Salud
- STUDY CHAIR
Pedro Gonzalez-Leandro, PhD
University of La Laguna
- STUDY CHAIR
Livia García-Pérez, PhD
University of La Laguna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2010
First Posted
May 21, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 14, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-09