Efficacy Study for the Symptomatic Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis With a 1 Year Safety Extension
A Phase III, Comparative Study for the Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Versus Cetirizine 10 mg and Placebo in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis During 4 Weeks, Followed by a Long-term Safety Extension With Bilastine 20 mg
1 other identifier
interventional
650
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Double-blind phase: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bilastine 20 mg, compared to Cetirizine and placebo for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Open-label Phase: The objective of this extension was to evaluate the long-term safety of Bilastine 20 mg during one year in the symptomatic treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started May 2004
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2010
CompletedSeptember 26, 2012
September 1, 2012
1.8 years
May 19, 2010
September 25, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Double-blind phase: AUC of TSS throughout the study
Area under curve (AUC) of total symptoms scale (TSS) from baseline (defined as the mean of 6 last points of the patients' diary before randomization) to D28 visit according to the patient's assessment on reflective symptoms.
28 days
Open-label phase: Long-term safety
Evaluation of the long-term safety of Bilastine 20 mg during one year in the symptomatic treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. The tolerability of the study drug was assessed by means of: Adverse events (comparing the profiles throughout the course of the study), ECGs on M3, M6, M9 and M12 visits and routine laboratory analyses (haematology and biochemistry) performed at M3, M6, M9 and M12 visits.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (13)
AUC of TSS since baseline to D28 according to the patient's assessment on instantaneous symptoms.
28 days
Change in the TSS on D14 and D28 visits versus D0 visit according to the patient and investigator's assessments (at the moment of the visits)
Day 14 and day 28
Change in Nasal Symptoms Score (NSS)
Day 14 and day 28
Change in Non Nasal Symptoms Score (NNSS)
Day 14 and day 28
Change in individual nasal and non nasal symptoms
Day 14 and day 28
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Bilastine
EXPERIMENTAL20 mg encapsulated tablets
Cetirizine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 mg encapsulated tablets
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOREncapsulated tablets
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of either sex aged from 12 to 70 years of age
- Positive skin prick test for at least one of the following perennial allergens (house-dust mites, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus or D. farinae, animal danders, dogs or cats, molds, etc.)
- Patients had to have a sum in the previous 6 assessments of the reflective nasal symptoms score equal to or greater than 30 (≥30 over 72). Additionally, at the time of randomization patients had to have positive symptomatology in instantaneous nasal symptoms equal or greater than 5 (≥5 over 12).
- Women of childbearing potential had to have a negative pregnancy test and had to use an effective contraceptive method.
- Provision of written informed consent to participate and willing to attend the required visits scheduled in the protocol
- The criteria to continue with the open label period included previous participation in the double blind period, eligibility for a long-term symptomatic treatment according to the investigator assessment and patient willingness to follow the treatment for one year.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have non-allergic rhinitis (vasomotor, infectious, drug-induced, etc.).
- Negative skin prick test (as defined in point 6.1.1.).
- Patients with nasal polyps or a significant deviation of the nasal septum as judged by the investigator as well as nasal intervention in the previous 6 months.
- Any other nasal illness that can interfere with the aim of the study.
- Patients who have acute or chronic sinusitis as judged by the investigator.
- Immunotherapy (6 months): In case of patients under immunotherapy the treatment had to have started more than 6 months prior to the start of the study, the doses could not be modified during the study, and any doses could not be administered 24 hours before any study visit..
- Patients who are taking or have taken specified medications prior to randomisation in the study and have not complied with the specified washout period
- Severe concomitant disease that could interfere with treatment response (hepatic, renal, cardiovascular), electrocardiographic abnormalities, arrhythmia, recent acute myocardial infarction or neoplastic diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Faes Farma, S.A.lead
Related Publications (2)
Bousquet J, Ansotegui I, Canonica GW, Zuberbier T, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bachert C, Cruz AA, Gonzalez SN, Kuna P, Morais-Almeida M, Mullol J, Ryan DP, Sanchez-Borges M, Valiente R, Church MK. Establishing the place in therapy of bilastine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis according to ARIA: evidence review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):131-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.648263. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
PMID: 22149770BACKGROUNDSastre J, Mullol J, Valero A, Valiente R; Bilastine Study Group. Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):121-30. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.640667. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
PMID: 22077106RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Piotr Kuna, Prof. MD.
Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz (Poland)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2010
First Posted
May 21, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2004
Primary Completion
March 1, 2006
Study Completion
November 1, 2006
Last Updated
September 26, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-09