Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery
EXPEDITE
Phase III, Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Exogenous Prostaglandin Comparing the Efficacy & Safety of the MVI 200 mcg Versus the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery in Pregnant Women at Term
1 other identifier
interventional
1,358
1 country
34
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 200 microgram (mcg) can decrease the time to vaginal delivery compared to the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) 10 milligram (mg) in pregnant women requiring cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Sep 2010
34 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 7, 2014
CompletedMay 1, 2014
April 1, 2014
1.5 years
May 19, 2010
January 24, 2014
April 15, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time to Vaginal Delivery During the First Hospital Admission
Interval from study drug administration to vaginal delivery (average 24 hours)
Incidence of Cesarean Delivery During the First Hospital Admission
Interval from study drug administration to cesarean delivery (average 24 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Time to Any Delivery (Vaginal or Cesarean) During the First Hospital Admission
Interval from study drug administration to neonate delivery (average 24 hours)
Time to Active Labor During the First Hospital Admission
Interval from study drug administration to active labor (average 12 hours)
Incidence of Pre-delivery Oxytocin During the First Hospital Admission
At least 30 minutes after study drug removal
Incidence of Vaginal Delivery Within 12 Hours
Interval from study drug administration to vaginal delivery within 12 hours
Incidence of Any Delivery Within 24 Hours
Interval from study drug administration to delivery of neonate within 24 hours
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MVI 200
EXPERIMENTALMVI 200 mcg vaginal insert
Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 mg Dinoprostone vaginal insert
Interventions
Dose reservoir of 200 mcg of misoprostol in a hydrogel polymer vaginal insert within a retrieval system. The MVI 200 will be kept in place for up to 24 hours or will be removed earlier if one of the following occur: onset of active labor, intrapartum adverse event necessitating discontinuation of the study drug, other reasons including maternal request.
Dose reservoir of 10 mg of dinoprostone in a hydrogel polymer vaginal insert within a retrieval system. The DVI will be kept in place for up to 24 hours or will be removed earlier if one of the following occur: onset of active labor, intrapartum adverse event necessitating discontinuation of the study drug, other reasons including maternal request.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provide written informed consent;
- Pregnant women at ≥ 36 weeks 0 days inclusive gestation;
- Women aged 18 years or older;
- Candidate for pharmacological induction of labor;
- Single, live vertex fetus;
- Baseline modified Bishop score ≤ 4;
- Parity ≤ 3 (parity is defined as one or more births live or dead after 24 weeks gestation);
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 50 at the time of entry to the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Women in active labor;
- Presence of uterine or cervical scar or uterine abnormality e.g., bicornate uterus. Biopsies, including cone biopsy of the cervix, are permitted;
- Administration of oxytocin or any cervical ripening or labor inducing agents (including mechanical methods) or a tocolytic drug within 7 days prior to enrollment. Magnesium sulfate is permitted if prescribed as treatment for pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension;
- Severe pre-eclampsia marked by Hemolytic anemia, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelet count (HELLP) syndrome, other end-organ affliction or Central Nervous System (CNS) findings other than mild headache;
- Fetal malpresentation;
- Diagnosed congenital anomalies, not including polydactyly;
- Any evidence of fetal compromise at baseline (e.g., non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern or meconium staining);
- Amnioinfusion or other treatment of non-reassuring fetal status at any time prior to the induction attempt;
- Ruptured membranes ≥ 48 hours prior to the start of treatment;
- Suspected chorioamnionitis;
- Fever (oral or aural temperature \> 37.5°C);
- Any condition in which vaginal delivery is contraindicated e.g., placenta previa or any unexplained genital bleeding at any time after 24 weeks during this pregnancy;
- Known or suspected allergy to misoprostol, dinoprostone, other prostaglandins or any of the excipients;
- Any condition urgently requiring delivery;
- Unable to comply with the protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (34)
Maricopa Medical Center - District Medical Group
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Precision Trials
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Phoenix Perinatal Associates (Scottsdale Healthcare Shea)
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Watching Over Mothers and Babies Foundation
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Miller's Childrens Hospital
Long Beach, California, United States
UCI Medical Center
Orange, California, United States
The Women's Clinic of Northern Colorado
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Christiana Care Health System (DE Center for MFM)
Newark, Delaware, United States
University of FL College of Medicine
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Altus Research
Lake Worth, Florida, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Kansas School of Medicine
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
University of Michigan Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Spectrum Health
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
St. Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
St. Peters University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
University of New Mexico/New Mexico Health Science Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
East Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Lyndhurst Gynecologic Associates
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Clinical Trials of America
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Drexel University College of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Temple University School of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
University Medical Group/Greenville Hospital System
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
UT College of Medicine Chattanooga, Erlanger Health System
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
High Risk Obstetrical Consultants, PLLC
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Research Memphis Associates
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Salt Lake Women's Center, PC
Sandy City, Utah, United States
Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
Related Publications (2)
Miller H, Goetzl L, Wing DA, Powers B, Rugarn O. Optimising daytime deliveries when inducing labour using prostaglandin vaginal inserts. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(4):517-22. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1011117. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
PMID: 25758619DERIVEDWing DA, Brown R, Plante LA, Miller H, Rugarn O, Powers BL. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):201-209. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829a2dd6.
PMID: 23857539DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Development Support
- Organization
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Development Support
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2010
First Posted
May 21, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 1, 2014
Results First Posted
March 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04