Polycaprolactone / Tricalcium Phosphate (PCL/TCP) v Titanium Orbital Implant : Randomised Trial
PCL/TCP
Comparing the Reconstruction of the Orbit Fracture With a Poly Caprolactone / Tri-Calcium Phosphate ( PCL/TCP ) Implant vs. a Titanium Mesh Implant.
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis: Polycaprolactone / Tricalcium Phosphate Orbital (PCL / TCP) Implant is as effective in the reconstruction of the Orbital walls as Titanium Mesh implant. In this study we will be conducting a randomised trial to compare implants made of 2 materials for Orbital reconstruction
- Polycaprolactone / Tricalcium Phosphate (PCL / TCP)
- Titanium Patients to be recruited :
- 80 randomised equally into the 2 groups
- age range: 21 - 70
- includes orbital wall defects from trauma, after osteotomies
- excludes patients with Diabetes Mellitus, known allergies to polycaprolactone \& its analogues, know allergies to Tricalcium Phosphate \& its analogues, infections generalised \& around the orbital region Trial Duration: April 2010 - March 2015 Follow up:
- postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months
- Computer Tomographic (CT) scan of Orbits immediate postoperative and at 12 months appointment
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedApril 28, 2014
April 1, 2014
4.9 years
May 5, 2010
April 24, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Enophthalmos
Assess the presence of enophthalmos after reconstruction of the orbital walls at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Diplopia
1 year
motility of the globe
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Polycaprolactone / Tricalcium Phosphate
EXPERIMENTALPolycaprolactone / Tricalcium Phosphate group to assess efficacy of new implant
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group with titanium mesh
Interventions
Orbital implant for reconstruction of the orbital walls
Titanium mesh for comparison to Polycaprolactone / Tri-Calcium Phosphate (PCL / TCP) mesh
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 21 y - 70 y
- both males / females included
- orbital fractures
- defect after orbital osteotomies
You may not qualify if:
- patient refusal
- infection around the orbit / generalised infection
- Diabetes mellitus
- allergies to polycaprolactone \& its analogues
- allergies to titanium
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National University Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 119074, Singapore
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thiam Chye Lim, MD
Natioanl University Hospital, Singapore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2010
First Posted
May 7, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 28, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04