NCT01116024

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study designed to evaluate safety and effectiveness of the ATS 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis in a patient population undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures. The Enable Aortic Valve is an equine pericardial stented bioprosthesis.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
173

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2006

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
5 countries

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2006

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 8, 2010

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 4, 2010

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2010

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 5, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 26, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

April 8, 2010

Results QC Date

May 26, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Diseased Heart Valve, Replacement, Aortic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Thromboembolism/Thrombosis

    Valve related thromboembolism and valvular thrombosis. Thrombosis was defined as any thrombus attached to or near the study valve that interfered with valve function in the absence of infection. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year)

    Five Years

  • Hemorrhage/Bleeding-Anticoagulant/Antiaggregant (All and Major)

    Any episode of internal or external bleeding in subjects receiving anticoagulant and/or antiaggregant therapy. Hemorrhage/Bleeding (No Anticoagulant/Antiaggregant): Any episode of internal or external bleeding in subjects not receiving anticoagulant and/or antiaggregant therapy. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

    Five Years

  • Paravalvular Leaks (All and Major)

    Paravalvular leak was defined as any evidence of leakage of blood around the prosthesis (between the sewing ring and native annulus). Major Paravalvular leak was defined as any evidence of leakage of blood around the prosthesis, i.e. between the sewing ring and native annulus that requires surgical intervention. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

    Five Years

  • Endocarditis

    Endocarditis was defined in the protocol as any infection involving the study valve. Any structural/non-structural valvular dysfunction, thrombosis, or embolic event associated with study valve endocarditis was captured as endocarditis only. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

    Five Years

  • Hemolysis

    Blood data analysis was performed in order to identify whether particular complications and serious adverse events such as hemolysis occurred. Hemolysis in subjects with tissue valves - as evidenced by increased serum lactate dehydrogenase concentrations, decreased serum haptoglobin concentration, erythrocytopenia and reticulocytosis - is usually associated with paravalvular leakage or infection.

    Five Years

  • Structural Valve Deterioration

    Structural deterioration was defined as any change in the study valve function which resulted from an intrinsic abnormality that caused stenosis or regurgitation. There were no cases of structural deterioration reported for the study. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

    Five Years

  • Non-Structural Dysfunction

    Any abnormality resulting in stenosis or regurgitation at the operated valve that is not intrinsic to the valve itself. Non-structural dysfunction refers to non-structural problems that result in dysfunction of an operated valve exclusive of thrombosis and infection diagnosed by reoperation, autopsy, or clinical investigation. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

    Five Years

  • Re-operation, Explant, Repair

    Reoperation was defined in the protocol as any operation to repair, alter, or replace the study valve. Included is reoperation for repair of paravalvular leak and explant. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

    Five Years

  • Effectiveness Endpoint - NYHA Classification, Hemodynamic Performance

    New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification to asses improvement of the cardiac status, Hemodynamic Performance analysis based on Doppler echocardiographic studies. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without limitations of ordinary activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitations or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken discomfort is increased.

    Five Years

  • Hemodynamic

    Mean and peak pressure gradients from discharge through 5 years follow up. The gradient represents the difference in blood pressure across the valve.

    Five Years

  • Hemodynamics - Effective Orifice Area

    Effective orifice area (EOA) data. The effective orifice area is a measure of how much the heart valve prosthesis impedes blood flow through the aortic valve.

    Five Years

  • Hemodynamics - Effective Orifice Area Index

    The effective orifice area index is a measure of how much the heart valve prosthesis impedes blood flow through the aortic valve.

    Five Years

Study Arms (1)

3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis Model 6000

EXPERIMENTAL

Single arm study

Device: ATS 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis Model 6000

Interventions

Replacement Aortic Heart Valve

3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis Model 6000

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient requires isolated aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures such as coronary artery bypass or another valve repair. (The three remaining valves must be of native tissue).
  • The patient is geographically stable and willing to return to the implant site for follow-up visits.
  • The patient has been adequately informed of risks and requirements and consent to his/her participation in the clinical study.
  • If this patient is female and of childbearing potential, patient has a negative pregnancy test within seven (7) days prior to the study procedure.

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient requires replacement of two or more valves.
  • The patient is \< 20 years of age.
  • The patient has a non-cardiac major or progressive disease, which in the Investigator's experience produces an unacceptable increased risk to the patient, or results in a life expectancy of less than 24 months.
  • The patient is an intravenous drug and/or alcohol abuser.
  • The patient presents with active endocarditis or other systemic infection.
  • The patient has had previous valve replacement surgery, including previous implant and then explant of the ATS 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis (Model 6000) or placement of a rigid annuloplasty ring in the mitral position.
  • The patient is participating in concomitant research studies of investigational products.
  • The patient presents with dilatation of the ascending aorta, Marfan Syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cystic medial degeneration, or other condition causing the ascending aorta to be irregular in geometry or physiology as seen via preoperative imaging.
  • The patient has chronic renal failure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, Austria

Location

Johann Wolfgang Goethe University

Frankfurt, Germany

Location

University Medical Center Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Location

University Medical Center Kiel

Kiel, Germany

Location

UKSH, Campus Lubeck

Lübeck, Germany

Location

Medical University of Gdansk

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Jagiellonian University

Krakow, Poland

Location

Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Basel

Basel, Switzerland

Location

Inselspital Bern

Bern, Switzerland

Location

John Radcliffe Hospital

Oxford, United Kingdom

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Valve Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Of the 173 subjects enrolled, a cohort of 148 subjects were implanted, followed and included in the analysis. 25 of the 173 subjects enrolled were intraoperative exclusions due to surgeon's discretion during the operative thoracotomy.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ryan Palmer, Principal Clinical Research Specialist
Organization
Medtronic, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Eric Vang

    Medtronic

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2010

First Posted

May 4, 2010

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion

December 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

June 26, 2018

Results First Posted

December 5, 2016

Record last verified: 2017-10

Locations