ATS 3f Enable(tm) Aortic Bioprosthesis, Model 6000
Enable
1 other identifier
interventional
173
5 countries
10
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study designed to evaluate safety and effectiveness of the ATS 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis in a patient population undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures. The Enable Aortic Valve is an equine pericardial stented bioprosthesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 5, 2016
CompletedJune 26, 2018
October 1, 2017
4.6 years
April 8, 2010
May 26, 2016
March 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Thromboembolism/Thrombosis
Valve related thromboembolism and valvular thrombosis. Thrombosis was defined as any thrombus attached to or near the study valve that interfered with valve function in the absence of infection. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year)
Five Years
Hemorrhage/Bleeding-Anticoagulant/Antiaggregant (All and Major)
Any episode of internal or external bleeding in subjects receiving anticoagulant and/or antiaggregant therapy. Hemorrhage/Bleeding (No Anticoagulant/Antiaggregant): Any episode of internal or external bleeding in subjects not receiving anticoagulant and/or antiaggregant therapy. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).
Five Years
Paravalvular Leaks (All and Major)
Paravalvular leak was defined as any evidence of leakage of blood around the prosthesis (between the sewing ring and native annulus). Major Paravalvular leak was defined as any evidence of leakage of blood around the prosthesis, i.e. between the sewing ring and native annulus that requires surgical intervention. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).
Five Years
Endocarditis
Endocarditis was defined in the protocol as any infection involving the study valve. Any structural/non-structural valvular dysfunction, thrombosis, or embolic event associated with study valve endocarditis was captured as endocarditis only. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).
Five Years
Hemolysis
Blood data analysis was performed in order to identify whether particular complications and serious adverse events such as hemolysis occurred. Hemolysis in subjects with tissue valves - as evidenced by increased serum lactate dehydrogenase concentrations, decreased serum haptoglobin concentration, erythrocytopenia and reticulocytosis - is usually associated with paravalvular leakage or infection.
Five Years
Structural Valve Deterioration
Structural deterioration was defined as any change in the study valve function which resulted from an intrinsic abnormality that caused stenosis or regurgitation. There were no cases of structural deterioration reported for the study. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).
Five Years
Non-Structural Dysfunction
Any abnormality resulting in stenosis or regurgitation at the operated valve that is not intrinsic to the valve itself. Non-structural dysfunction refers to non-structural problems that result in dysfunction of an operated valve exclusive of thrombosis and infection diagnosed by reoperation, autopsy, or clinical investigation. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).
Five Years
Re-operation, Explant, Repair
Reoperation was defined in the protocol as any operation to repair, alter, or replace the study valve. Included is reoperation for repair of paravalvular leak and explant. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).
Five Years
Effectiveness Endpoint - NYHA Classification, Hemodynamic Performance
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification to asses improvement of the cardiac status, Hemodynamic Performance analysis based on Doppler echocardiographic studies. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without limitations of ordinary activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitations or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken discomfort is increased.
Five Years
Hemodynamic
Mean and peak pressure gradients from discharge through 5 years follow up. The gradient represents the difference in blood pressure across the valve.
Five Years
Hemodynamics - Effective Orifice Area
Effective orifice area (EOA) data. The effective orifice area is a measure of how much the heart valve prosthesis impedes blood flow through the aortic valve.
Five Years
Hemodynamics - Effective Orifice Area Index
The effective orifice area index is a measure of how much the heart valve prosthesis impedes blood flow through the aortic valve.
Five Years
Study Arms (1)
3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis Model 6000
EXPERIMENTALSingle arm study
Interventions
Replacement Aortic Heart Valve
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient requires isolated aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures such as coronary artery bypass or another valve repair. (The three remaining valves must be of native tissue).
- The patient is geographically stable and willing to return to the implant site for follow-up visits.
- The patient has been adequately informed of risks and requirements and consent to his/her participation in the clinical study.
- If this patient is female and of childbearing potential, patient has a negative pregnancy test within seven (7) days prior to the study procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient requires replacement of two or more valves.
- The patient is \< 20 years of age.
- The patient has a non-cardiac major or progressive disease, which in the Investigator's experience produces an unacceptable increased risk to the patient, or results in a life expectancy of less than 24 months.
- The patient is an intravenous drug and/or alcohol abuser.
- The patient presents with active endocarditis or other systemic infection.
- The patient has had previous valve replacement surgery, including previous implant and then explant of the ATS 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis (Model 6000) or placement of a rigid annuloplasty ring in the mitral position.
- The patient is participating in concomitant research studies of investigational products.
- The patient presents with dilatation of the ascending aorta, Marfan Syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cystic medial degeneration, or other condition causing the ascending aorta to be irregular in geometry or physiology as seen via preoperative imaging.
- The patient has chronic renal failure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
Frankfurt, Germany
University Medical Center Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
University Medical Center Kiel
Kiel, Germany
UKSH, Campus Lubeck
Lübeck, Germany
Medical University of Gdansk
Gdansk, Poland
Jagiellonian University
Krakow, Poland
Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Basel
Basel, Switzerland
Inselspital Bern
Bern, Switzerland
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Of the 173 subjects enrolled, a cohort of 148 subjects were implanted, followed and included in the analysis. 25 of the 173 subjects enrolled were intraoperative exclusions due to surgeon's discretion during the operative thoracotomy.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ryan Palmer, Principal Clinical Research Specialist
- Organization
- Medtronic, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eric Vang
Medtronic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2010
First Posted
May 4, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 26, 2018
Results First Posted
December 5, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-10