To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Acetaminophen 650 mg and 1000mg in Dental Pain After Surgery
A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Dose, Safety and Efficacy Study of Acetaminophen 1000 mg and Acetaminophen 650 mg in Post Operative Dental Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
540
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of acetaminophen 650 mg and acetaminophen 1000 mg in dental surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain
Started Jun 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 28, 2012
CompletedMay 28, 2012
April 1, 2012
7 months
April 30, 2010
January 4, 2012
April 26, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Analgesic Efficacy - Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores Over Six Hours (SPRID6)
Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference and Pain Relief Scores Over Six Hours (SPRID6) - pain intensity and pain relief were evaluated using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 = no pain and 100 = very severe pain for pain intensity and 0 = no relief and 100 = complete relief for pain relief. For SPRID6, the total possible minimum value is -300 (worst) and the total possible maximum value is 1200 (best). The weights used in the calculation of weighted sums were equal to the elapsed time (hour) between the time point of interest and the preceding time point.
6 Hours
Secondary Outcomes (42)
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Over Six Hours (SPID6)
6 Hours
Sum of Pain Relief Scores Over Six Hours (TOTPAR6)
6 Hours
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 15 Minutes
15 Minutes
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 30 Minutes
30 Minutes
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 45 Minutes
45 Minutes
- +37 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
ACE-1000
EXPERIMENTAL1000 mg Acetaminophen Caplet
ACE-650
ACTIVE COMPARATOR650 mg Acetaminophen Caplet
ACE-0
PLACEBO COMPARATOR0 mg Acetaminophen Caplet
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be at least 16 and less than 51 years of age
- Must weigh at least 100 lbs with a body mass index of at least 18 and less than 30
- Must have up to four of their back teeth (third-molars) pulled
You may not qualify if:
- Cannot be allergic to acetaminophen (Tylenol)
- Cannot be pregnant (or planning to be pregnant) or nursing a baby
- Cannot have any other medical conditions that the investigator determines might compromise your safety or the study results
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jean Brown Research
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124, United States
Related Publications (1)
Qi DS, May LG, Zimmerman B, Peng P, Atillasoy E, Brown JD, Cooper SA. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of acetaminophen 1000 mg versus acetaminophen 650 mg for the treatment of postsurgical dental pain. Clin Ther. 2012 Dec;34(12):2247-2258.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
PMID: 23200183DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) set, which included all subjects who were randomized, took study medication, did not vomit within 60 minutes after dosing, and had a baseline pain score and at least one post-randomization assessment.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Joyce Hauze, RPS Sr Specialist, Clinical Research Operations
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Daniel Qi, M.D.
McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division of McNEIL-PPC, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2010
First Posted
May 4, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
May 28, 2012
Results First Posted
May 28, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-04