Superiority Study for Pain Treatment After Cesarean
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Pain Management After Cesarean Section: Oxycodon vs. Intravenous Piritramide
1 other identifier
interventional
239
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate adequate pain treatment for patients after cesarean. In this study oral opioids were compared to intravenous opioids as they are supposed to provide superior pain control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 pain
Started Jul 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 15, 2013
CompletedDecember 12, 2016
October 1, 2016
4 months
April 27, 2010
February 21, 2012
October 28, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference of Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
The primary outcome measure was the change in patients assessment of pain after cesarean (CS) from baseline. For pain assessment a visual analog scale (VAS) was used. Women were asked to quantify pain using an eleven point numerical rating score from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain, and 10 the worst pain. Single value were calculated (averaged).
Pain level was evaluated before therapy (2h after CS), 12h, 24h, 32h, 40h, 48 and 72h after CS.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Subgroups
6 month
Side Effects
6 month
Mobilisation
6 month
Costs
6 month
Study Arms (2)
Oxycodon
EXPERIMENTALPatient controlled analgesia (PCA) device with Pritramid
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Patients assigned to the oral analgesia group received 20mg oxycodon at fixed intervals: 2 hours (h) and between 12h and 14h after cesarean.
Patients assigned to the PCA group received a single use intravenous PCA device (Vygon, Medical Products, Aachen, Germany) with a 30ml deposit of 9% sodium chloride solution containing 60mg piritramide. Bolus injection of 0.5ml was administered by the patient herself if needed, with a lock out interval of 5 minutes Patients assigned to the oral analgesia group received 20mg oxycodon at fixed intervals: 2 hours (h) and between 12h and 14h after cesarean. The PCA was discontinued after 24 hours or earlier if demanded.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- cesarean in spinal anesthesia,
- no history of opioid or metamizol treatment
- written consent
- ability to use a Patient-controlled analgesia device
You may not qualify if:
- cesarean in general anaesthesia
- use of peridural catheter for pre-, peri- or post cesarean analgesia
- additional post cesarean metamizol use
- allergy/hypersensitivity to morphine, oxycodon, acetaminophen or ibuprofen
- chronic use of general anaesthesia
- history of known pain syndrome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Max Dieterichlead
- University of Rostockcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Rostock, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 18055, Germany
Related Publications (5)
Stamer UM, Wiese R, Stuber F, Wulf H, Meuser T. Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Feb;49(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00583.x.
PMID: 15715617BACKGROUNDDavis KM, Esposito MA, Meyer BA. Oral analgesia compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):967-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.025.
PMID: 16580284BACKGROUNDGammaitoni AR, Galer BS, Bulloch S, Lacouture P, Caruso F, Ma T, Schlagheck T. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the analgesic efficacy of oxycodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg versus controlled-release oxycodone 20 mg in postsurgical pain. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;43(3):296-304. doi: 10.1177/0091270003251147.
PMID: 12638399BACKGROUNDCarvalho B, Cohen SE, Lipman SS, Fuller A, Mathusamy AD, Macario A. Patient preferences for anesthesia outcomes associated with cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1182-1187. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000167774.36833.99.
PMID: 16192541BACKGROUNDDieterich M, Muller-Jordan K, Stubert J, Kundt G, Wagner K, Gerber B. Pain management after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial of oxycodone versus intravenous piritramide. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;286(4):859-65. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2384-5. Epub 2012 May 24.
PMID: 22622852DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Max Dieterich
- Organization
- University of Rostock
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Max Dieterich, MD
University of Rostock, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Max Dieterich
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2010
First Posted
May 4, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
December 12, 2016
Results First Posted
February 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2016-10