NCT01115101

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate adequate pain treatment for patients after cesarean. In this study oral opioids were compared to intravenous opioids as they are supposed to provide superior pain control.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
239

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 27, 2010

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 4, 2010

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 15, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2016

Status Verified

October 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

April 27, 2010

Results QC Date

February 21, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 28, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

pain after cesareanvisual analog scaleoxycodonpiritramid

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference of Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale

    The primary outcome measure was the change in patients assessment of pain after cesarean (CS) from baseline. For pain assessment a visual analog scale (VAS) was used. Women were asked to quantify pain using an eleven point numerical rating score from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain, and 10 the worst pain. Single value were calculated (averaged).

    Pain level was evaluated before therapy (2h after CS), 12h, 24h, 32h, 40h, 48 and 72h after CS.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Subgroups

    6 month

  • Side Effects

    6 month

  • Mobilisation

    6 month

  • Costs

    6 month

Study Arms (2)

Oxycodon

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Oral Oxycodon

Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device with Pritramid

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Piritramid

Interventions

Patients assigned to the oral analgesia group received 20mg oxycodon at fixed intervals: 2 hours (h) and between 12h and 14h after cesarean.

Oxycodon

Patients assigned to the PCA group received a single use intravenous PCA device (Vygon, Medical Products, Aachen, Germany) with a 30ml deposit of 9% sodium chloride solution containing 60mg piritramide. Bolus injection of 0.5ml was administered by the patient herself if needed, with a lock out interval of 5 minutes Patients assigned to the oral analgesia group received 20mg oxycodon at fixed intervals: 2 hours (h) and between 12h and 14h after cesarean. The PCA was discontinued after 24 hours or earlier if demanded.

Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device with Pritramid

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • cesarean in spinal anesthesia,
  • no history of opioid or metamizol treatment
  • written consent
  • ability to use a Patient-controlled analgesia device

You may not qualify if:

  • cesarean in general anaesthesia
  • use of peridural catheter for pre-, peri- or post cesarean analgesia
  • additional post cesarean metamizol use
  • allergy/hypersensitivity to morphine, oxycodon, acetaminophen or ibuprofen
  • chronic use of general anaesthesia
  • history of known pain syndrome

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Rostock, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 18055, Germany

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Stamer UM, Wiese R, Stuber F, Wulf H, Meuser T. Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Feb;49(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00583.x.

    PMID: 15715617BACKGROUND
  • Davis KM, Esposito MA, Meyer BA. Oral analgesia compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):967-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.025.

    PMID: 16580284BACKGROUND
  • Gammaitoni AR, Galer BS, Bulloch S, Lacouture P, Caruso F, Ma T, Schlagheck T. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the analgesic efficacy of oxycodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg versus controlled-release oxycodone 20 mg in postsurgical pain. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;43(3):296-304. doi: 10.1177/0091270003251147.

    PMID: 12638399BACKGROUND
  • Carvalho B, Cohen SE, Lipman SS, Fuller A, Mathusamy AD, Macario A. Patient preferences for anesthesia outcomes associated with cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2005 Oct;101(4):1182-1187. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000167774.36833.99.

    PMID: 16192541BACKGROUND
  • Dieterich M, Muller-Jordan K, Stubert J, Kundt G, Wagner K, Gerber B. Pain management after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial of oxycodone versus intravenous piritramide. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;286(4):859-65. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2384-5. Epub 2012 May 24.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Pirinitramide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Isonipecotic AcidsAcids, HeterocyclicHeterocyclic CompoundsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Max Dieterich
Organization
University of Rostock

Study Officials

  • Max Dieterich, MD

    University of Rostock, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. Max Dieterich

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2010

First Posted

May 4, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

November 1, 2009

Study Completion

November 1, 2009

Last Updated

December 12, 2016

Results First Posted

February 15, 2013

Record last verified: 2016-10

Locations