NCT01112241

Brief Summary

This study has been designed to provide a substantial evidence of acute bronchodilator responsiveness to two sequentially inhaled drugs, a beta2-agonist (i.e., albuterol) and an anticholinergic (i.e., tiotropium bromide), in a group of patients who developed obliterative bronchiolitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
17

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2010

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2010

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 27, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2010

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 23, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2011

Status Verified

April 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

April 27, 2010

Results QC Date

November 30, 2010

Last Update Submit

February 28, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

Obliterative bronchiolitisBronchodilator responsivenessPartial forced expiratory flowLung volumes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Per Cent Change of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FEV1 increments ≥12 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society standard criteria \[Pellegrino et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968\]. They were calculated as follows: \[FEV1, expressed in liters (L), after bronchodilators - FEV1 (L) before bronchodilators/FEV1 (L) before bronchodilators x 100\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Absolute Change of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FEV1 increments ≥0.20 liters (L) as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society standard criteria \[Pellegrino et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968\]. They were calculated as follows: \[FEV1 (L) after bronchodilators - FEV1 (L) before bronchodilators\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Per Cent Change of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FVC increments ≥12 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society standard criteria \[Pellegrino et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968\]. They were calculated as follows: \[FVC, expressed in liters (L), after bronchodilators - FVC (L) before bronchodilators/FVC (L) before bronchodilators x 100\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Absolute Change of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FVC increments ≥0.20 liters (L) compared with baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to the American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society standard criteria \[Pellegrino et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 948-968\]. They were calculated as follows: \[FVC (L) after bronchodilators - FVC (L) before bronchodilators\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Per Cent Change of Instantaneous Maximal Forced Expiratory Flow (V'Max) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, V'max increments ≥40 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to Pellegrino et al. \[Chest 1998; 114:1607-1612\]. They were calculated as follows: \[V'max, expressed in liters.second-1 (L.s-1), after bronchodilators - V'max (L.s-1) before bronchodilators/V'max (L.s-1) before bronchodilators x 100\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Per Cent Change of Partial Forced Expiratory Flow (V'Part) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, V'part increments ≥40 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to Pellegrino et al. \[Chest 1998; 114:1607-1612\]. They were calculated as follows: \[V'part, expressed in liters.second-1 (L.s-1), after bronchodilators - V'part (L.s-1) before bronchodilators/V'part (L.s-1) before bronchodilators x 100\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Per Cent Change of Residual Volume (RV) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, RV decrements ≥10 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to O'Donnell et al. \[Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 914-920\]. They were calculated as follows: \[RV, expressed in liters (L), before bronchodilators - RV (L) after bronchodilators/RV (L) after bronchodilators x 100\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Absolute Change of Residual Volume (RV) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, RV decrements ≥0.30 liters (L) as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to O'Donnell et al. \[Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 914-920\]. They were calculated as follows: \[RV (L), before bronchodilators - RV (L) after bronchodilators\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Per Cent Change of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FRC decrements ≥10 per cent as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to O'Donnell et al. \[Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 914-920\]. They were calculated as follows: \[FRC, expressed in liters (L), before bronchodilators - FRC (L) after bronchodilators/FRC (L) after bronchodilators x 100\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

  • Absolute Change of Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) After Bronchodilators

    Following albuterol plus tiotropium inhalation, FRC decrements ≥0.30 liters (L) as compared to baseline, in an individual subject, were considered as evidence of response to bronchodilators, according to O'Donnell et al. \[Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 914-920\]. They were calculated as follows: \[FRC (L), before bronchodilators - FRC (L) after bronchodilators\].

    Baseline and 90 min after bronchodilators

Study Arms (1)

albuterol-tiotropium

EXPERIMENTAL

At visit 1, lung function measurements will be performed in triplicate before and 90 min after inhaling four separate doses of 100 μg of albuterol (Ventolin®) and soon after 18 μg of tiotropium bromide \[Spiriva®\] to ensure maximal or near-maximal bronchodilation. Albuterol will be given by a metered-dose inhaler connected to a valved-holding chamber (Volumatic®) and tiotropium by a dry-powder device (Handihaler®).

Drug: albuterol plus tiotropium

Interventions

Four separate doses of 100 μg of albuterol and 18 μg of tiotropium bromide. Albuterol will be given by a metered-dose inhaler connected to a valved-holding chamber and tiotropium by a dry-powder device.

Also known as: Ventolin® and Spiriva®
albuterol-tiotropium

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) following allogeneic HSCT
  • FEV1 to slow inspiratory vital capacity (VC) ratio (FEV1/VC)\<5th percentile
  • FEV1 \<75% predicted or absolute FEV1 fall \>10% of pre-HSCT value
  • evidence of OB by computed tomography scanning
  • negative microbiological yields in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
  • chronic graft-versus-host disease score \>0
  • negative history for bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other significant respiratory disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • inability to perform lung function maneuvers
  • pre-existent chronic lung disease other than OB

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unit of Preventive and Occupational Medicine - Laboratory of Respiratory Pathophysiology, University Hospital San Martino

Genoa, 16132, Italy

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Pellegrino R, Rodarte JR, Brusasco V. Assessing the reversibility of airway obstruction. Chest. 1998 Dec;114(6):1607-12. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.6.1607.

    PMID: 9872196BACKGROUND
  • Barisione G, Bacigalupo A, Crimi E, Van Lint MT, Lamparelli T, Brusasco V. Changes in lung volumes and airway responsiveness following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eur Respir J. 2008 Dec;32(6):1576-82. doi: 10.1183/09031936.0139807. Epub 2008 Aug 6.

    PMID: 18684842BACKGROUND
  • Barisione G, Bacigalupo A, Crimi E, Brusasco V. Acute bronchodilator responsiveness in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Chest. 2011 Mar;139(3):633-639. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1442. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bronchiolitis Obliterans

Interventions

AlbuterolTiotropium Bromide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BronchiolitisBronchitisBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EthanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsAminesPhenethylaminesEthylaminesScopolamine DerivativesTropanesAzabicyclo CompoundsAza CompoundsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Giovanni Barisione, MD
Organization
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, Genova, Italy

Study Officials

  • Giovanni Barisione, MD

    Unit of Preventive and Occupational Medicine, University Hospital San Martino, Genoa, Italy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2010

First Posted

April 28, 2010

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion

May 1, 2010

Study Completion

May 1, 2010

Last Updated

March 2, 2011

Results First Posted

February 23, 2011

Record last verified: 2010-04

Locations