Study Stopped
A significant reduction in head injuries coupled with more frequent use of crainectomy reduced the number of potential subjects.
Hypertonic Saline vs. Mannitol for Elevated Intercranial Pressure
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines the role of osmotic agents in controlling brain swelling in brain injured individuals. Two osmotic agents -- mannitol and hypertonic saline -- are in common use, and they will be compared in the context of a randomized clinical trial. The goal is to determine if these agent differ in their ability to control episodes of brain swelling.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2010
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedMarch 5, 2013
March 1, 2013
7 months
April 22, 2010
March 4, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of time during which ICP is less than or equal to 20 mmHg during the first 120 hours following initiation of ICP monitoring. In the case where a patient is weaned from infusion, full ICP control will be assumed.
ICP will be recorded continuously and the proportion of time during which ICP is uncontrolled will be calculated. Specifically, this will be measured as any period during which ICP \> 20 mmHg for 600 seconds or longer.
120 hours post initiation of monitoring
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Therapy Intensity Level (TIL), reflecting the amount and duration of therapy required to control ICP. TIL incorporates, among others, variables such as degree of head elevation, level of sedation, volume of CSF drainage, and hypocapnia.
Daily
Long-term outcomes measured by Disability Rating Scale and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended
3 and 6 months post-injury
Incidence of pre-determined severe adverse events (SAEs): brain hypoxia, delayed decompression, pulmonary edema, renal failure, respiratory complications, seizures, systemic hypoxia, and uncontrollable ICP
Each occurence of an SAE during the patient's hospital stay will be recorded.
Study Arms (2)
Mannitol
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.9% normal saline infusion and boluses of mannitol
Hypertonic Saline
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3% hypertonic saline continuous infusion, with intermittent boluses as needed
Interventions
3% hypertonic saline continuous infusion, with intermittent boluses as needed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- closed traumatic brain injury
- either (i) GCS score 3-8 (inclusive), or (ii) GCS motor score of 5 or less AND abnormal admission CT scan showing intracranial pathology
- hemodynamically stable with systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg
- at least 1 reactive pupil
- age between 18y and 70y (inclusive)
- INR less than 1.5
You may not qualify if:
- actively on hypertonic saline or mannitol
- hypernatremia (\>145 meq/L)
- anuric or with creatinine greater than or equal to 2.5
- known seizure disorder
- penetrating head trauma
- suspected anoxic events
- history of, or CT confirmation of, previous brain injury
- any injury that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, has a high likelihood of death with the first 72 hours post-injury
- any treatment, condition, or injury that contraindicates treatment with hypertonic saline
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Cincinnatilead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Related Publications (5)
Zornow MH. Hypertonic saline as a safe and efficacious treatment of intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1996 Apr;8(2):175-7. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199604000-00021. No abstract available.
PMID: 8829566BACKGROUNDDoyle JA, Davis DP, Hoyt DB. The use of hypertonic saline in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2001 Feb;50(2):367-83. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200102000-00030. No abstract available.
PMID: 11242309BACKGROUNDQureshi AI, Suarez JI. Use of hypertonic saline solutions in treatment of cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension. Crit Care Med. 2000 Sep;28(9):3301-13. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200009000-00032.
PMID: 11008996BACKGROUNDGunnar W, Jonasson O, Merlotti G, Stone J, Barrett J. Head injury and hemorrhagic shock: studies of the blood brain barrier and intracranial pressure after resuscitation with normal saline solution, 3% saline solution, and dextran-40. Surgery. 1988 Apr;103(4):398-407.
PMID: 2451302BACKGROUNDOgden AT, Mayer SA, Connolly ES Jr. Hyperosmolar agents in neurosurgical practice: the evolving role of hypertonic saline. Neurosurgery. 2005 Aug;57(2):207-15; discussion 207-15. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000166533.79031.d8.
PMID: 16094147BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lori Shutter, MD
Department of Neurology College of Medicine University of Cincinnati
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2010
First Posted
April 27, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
March 5, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-03