Study Stopped
Not able to finalize funding
EcoAnaesthesia Facemask Versus Standard Facemask During Anesthesia Induction
A Comparison of the Efficiency of the New EcoAnaesthesia Facemask With a Standard Facemask During Induction of Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficiency of the EcoAnesthesia mask and its advantages over the standard facemask used in our practice. The satisfaction by the anesthesia provider and its ease of use may change the standard practice in airway management. In addition to these additional effects on patient safety, the facemask is affordable and may reduce the environmental burden of anesthesia waste.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedApril 7, 2017
April 1, 2017
3.7 years
April 13, 2010
April 6, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
End-tidal oxygen concentration
End-tidal oxygen concentration after 3 minutes with the mask that the patient was first randomized to use.
three minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Maximum airway pressure
End of 3 minutes with each mask
Study Arms (2)
EcoAnesthesia Mask first
ACTIVE COMPARATORBoth the "standard adult facemask" (Portex Adult, USA) and the new facemask (EcoAnesthesia Mask, Intersurgical, Inc., Liverpool, NY, USA) will be tested in each patient for three minutes. The order of usage of each mask will be randomly assigned to each patient. This group will receive the EcoAnesthesia Mask first.
Standard mask first
ACTIVE COMPARATORBoth the "standard adult facemask" (Portex Adult, USA) and the new facemask (EcoAnesthesia Mask, Intersurgical, Inc., Liverpool, NY, USA) will be tested in each patient for three minutes. The order of usage of each mask will be randomly assigned to each patient. Patients in this arm will receive the standard mask first.
Interventions
The trial facemask will be used before the standard one.
The standard facemask will be applied before the trial device.
The standard facemask will be applied after the trial device
The trial facemask will be used after the standard one.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status class 1-2
- Undergoing elective surgery
- Aged between 18 and 75 years
You may not qualify if:
- Severe acute or chronic lung disease requiring oxygen-therapy;
- Hiatus hernia with gastro-esophageal reflux or other esophageal or gastric abnormalities that require a rapid sequence induction;
- Food intake within the last 6 hours or clear fluid intake within 2 hours prior to surgery;
- Ischemic or congenital heart disease;
- Pregnancy (confirmed by a pregnancy test);
- Patient is scheduled for regional anesthesia and denies conductance of general anesthesia during the surgical procedure;
- Known difficult intubation in the past.
- Difficult Mask Ventilation. Patients having any two of the criteria listed below will be Categorized as "Difficult Mask Ventilation (DMV)" (5,13,14) and will be excluded from enrollment. All others will be classified as "Normal." Age \> 55 BMI \> 26 kg/m2 Lack of teeth Presence of beard History of snoring Limited mandibular protrusion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Louisville Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kheterpal S, Martin L, Shanks AM, Tremper KK. Prediction and outcomes of impossible mask ventilation: a review of 50,000 anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2009 Apr;110(4):891-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819b5b87.
PMID: 19293691BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Detlef Obal, MD
University of Louisville
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2010
First Posted
April 15, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04