NCT01098162

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to systematically and prospectively collect data from patients with partial-onset seizures in routine clinical practice setting receiving adjunctive Vimpat®. The observed population will be only patients with one baseline antiepileptic drug. Seizure control and tolerability data will be evaluated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
576

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2010

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

113 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2010

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2013

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 22, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 3, 2014

Status Verified

August 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2010

Results QC Date

June 24, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

LacosamideVimpat®EpilepsyPartial-Onset SeizuresAdjunctive therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Month 6

    For the assessment of the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), the investigator provided his/her assessment of the subject's clinical status compared to Baseline. He/she was asked to check the category that best describes the subject's condition over the past 6 months compared to Baseline: * Very much improved * Much improved * Minimally improved * No change * Minimally worse * Much worse * Very much worse

    Month 6

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in Number (Frequency) of Partial-onset Seizures Without Secondary Generalization From Baseline to Month 3

    From Baseline to Month 3

  • Change in Number (Frequency) of Partial-onset Seizures Without Secondary Generalization From Baseline to Month 6

    From Baseline to Month 6

  • Change in Number (Frequency) of Seizures With Secondary Generalization From Baseline to Month 3

    From Baseline to Month 3

  • Change in Number (Frequency) of Seizures With Secondary Generalization From Baseline to Month 6

    From Baseline to Month 6

  • Incidence of Adverse Events During the Study

    From Inclusion Visit (Day 0) up to Month 6

Study Arms (1)

Vimpat®

Routine treatment in accordance with the local marketing authorization for Vimpat® added to one Baseline antiepileptic drug.

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with Partial-Onset Seizures not sufficiently controlled with one Baseline Antiepileptic Drug (AED), treated by Epilepsy centers, clinics or office-based neurologists with adjunctive Vimpat® in routine daily practice.

You may qualify if:

  • The patient's treatment must be in accordance with the local marketing authorization (MA) for Vimpat®
  • The decision to prescribe Vimpat® has to be made by the physician before and independently of his/her decision to include the patient in the study
  • The patient must have a diagnosis of Epilepsy with Partial-Onset Seizures
  • Based on the physician's clinical judgment, the patient's seizure activity is not controlled sufficiently on a current monotherapy and it is in the patient's best interest to be prescribed adjunctive Vimpat®

You may not qualify if:

  • In accordance with the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (113)

55

Aachen, Germany

Location

119

Aalen, Germany

Location

194

Aichach, Germany

Location

191

Altenburg, Germany

Location

136

Alzenau in Unterfranken, Germany

Location

78

Aschaffenburg, Germany

Location

35

Bad Berka, Germany

Location

90

Baesweiler, Germany

Location

107

Berlin, Germany

Location

10A

Berlin, Germany

Location

141

Berlin, Germany

Location

25

Berlin, Germany

Location

49

Berlin, Germany

Location

66

Berlin, Germany

Location

75

Berlin, Germany

Location

36

Bielefeld, Germany

Location

5

Bonn, Germany

Location

192

Böblingen, Germany

Location

175

Brandenburg, Germany

Location

105

Chemnitz, Germany

Location

176

Cologne, Germany

Location

180

Cologne, Germany

Location

182

Coppenbrügge, Germany

Location

161

Dortmund, Germany

Location

128

Dresden, Germany

Location

21

Dresden, Germany

Location

39

Dresden, Germany

Location

111

Düren, Germany

Location

38

Düsseldorf, Germany

Location

7

Eberswalde, Germany

Location

102

Eisenach, Germany

Location

174

Eisenach, Germany

Location

56

Ellwangen, Germany

Location

50

Erbach im Odenwald, Germany

Location

179

Erfurt, Germany

Location

186

Erfurt, Germany

Location

6

Erlangen, Germany

Location

12

Essen, Germany

Location

27

Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Location

137

Fulda, Germany

Location

112

Gelsenkirchen, Germany

Location

103

Gera, Germany

Location

158

Göttingen, Germany

Location

65

Göttingen, Germany

Location

88

Göttingen, Germany

Location

1

Greifswald, Germany

Location

47

Grevenbroich, Germany

Location

134

Halle, Germany

Location

160

Hamburg, Germany

Location

71

Hamburg, Germany

Location

93

Hamm, Germany

Location

147

Heilbronn, Germany

Location

122

Herborn, Germany

Location

15

Herdecke, Germany

Location

130

Höchberg, Germany

Location

40

Immenstadt im Allgäu, Germany

Location

52

Jena, Germany

Location

61

Jülich, Germany

Location

44

Karlstadt am Main, Germany

Location

133

Kastellaun, Germany

Location

125

Kaufbeuren, Germany

Location

16

Kiel, Germany

Location

99

Kleve, Germany

Location

37

Krefeld, Germany

Location

46

Lappersdorf, Germany

Location

113

Leipzig, Germany

Location

4

Leipzig, Germany

Location

68

Leipzig, Germany

Location

81

Leipzig, Germany

Location

138

Lohr a. Main, Germany

Location

131

Ludwigsburg, Germany

Location

148

Lüdenscheid, Germany

Location

33

Mainz, Germany

Location

154

Mannheim, Germany

Location

151

Mühlhausen, Germany

Location

101

München, Germany

Location

167

München, Germany

Location

2

München, Germany

Location

43

Neuburg am Inn, Germany

Location

62

Neukirchen-Vluyn, Germany

Location

123

Neumarkt, Germany

Location

69

Nuremberg, Germany

Location

80

Oelde, Germany

Location

98

Oldenburg, Germany

Location

87

Oranienburg, Germany

Location

57

Potsdam, Germany

Location

3

Radeberg, Germany

Location

159

Rathenow, Germany

Location

45

Ravensburg, Germany

Location

95

Rostock, Germany

Location

85

Rüsselsheim am Main, Germany

Location

20

Schleswig, Germany

Location

157

Schlüchtern, Germany

Location

166

Schorndorf, Germany

Location

181

Schriesheim, Germany

Location

150

Schwäb. Gmünd, Germany

Location

168

Schwedt, Germany

Location

140

Senftenberg, Germany

Location

164

Siegen, Germany

Location

144

Sondershausen, Germany

Location

127

Stralsund, Germany

Location

14

Stuttgart, Germany

Location

170

Stuttgart, Germany

Location

104

Traunstein, Germany

Location

183

Troisdorf, Germany

Location

17

Tübingen, Germany

Location

13

Ulm, Germany

Location

48

Ulm, Germany

Location

54

Unterhaching, Germany

Location

171

Wermsdorf, Germany

Location

143

Westerstede, Germany

Location

79

Wismar, Germany

Location

169

Wolfratshausen, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Runge U, Arnold S, Brandt C, Reinhardt F, Kuhn F, Isensee K, Ramirez F, Dedeken P, Lauterbach T, Noack-Rink M, Mayer T. A noninterventional study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of lacosamide added to monotherapy in patients with epilepsy with partial-onset seizures in daily clinical practice: The VITOBA study. Epilepsia. 2015 Dec;56(12):1921-30. doi: 10.1111/epi.13224. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Epilepsies, PartialEpilepsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
Organization
UCB

Study Officials

  • UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

    +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2010

First Posted

April 2, 2010

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion

July 1, 2013

Study Completion

July 1, 2013

Last Updated

September 3, 2014

Results First Posted

July 22, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-08

Locations