Tolerance to Hemodialysis in Insulin-Requiring Diabetic Patients: BD vs AFB With Blood Volume Biofeedback
THIRD
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Diabetic nephropathy is becoming the most common primary renal disease in end stage renal disease patients. The prevalence of diabetic patients in dialysis reaches even the 30% of the dialysis population (USRDS) with an incidence rate, in some countries, up to 40%. The 5 years surviving time of diabetic patients in dialysis is about the 20% and, compared to the hypertension and glomerulonephritis complications, still remains the worst. Diabetes is often associated to several comorbid factors such as hypertension, autonomic neuropathy, vasculopathy, metabolic disorders (ketoacidosis, poor glycaemic control), and electrolyte disorders. So, the diabetic patient is fragile, with a rather poor tolerance to dialysis, lack of achievement of dry body weight and inadequate dialysis. In order to gain a more detailed insight into a possible better tolerance to dialysis, arising from the elimination of acetate in dialysate bath (Acetate Free Biofiltration) and from the use of an automatic system to control the blood volume (Blood Volume Control),the investigators would like to investigate the cardiovascular stability and the frequency of intradialytic symptoms in a prospective, randomized, cross-over study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2010
CompletedApril 2, 2010
March 1, 2010
4 years
March 29, 2010
April 1, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Investigate a possible better tolerance to dialysis, eliminating acetate in the dialysate bath, with AFB treatment, and using, at the same time, the automatic blood volume control (BVC).
The treatment tolerance is measured by the number of intradialytic hypotensive events, defined as: * systolic blood pressure less then 90 mmHg; * systolic blood pressure more then 25 mmHg to the predialysis value, with hypotensive events requiring therapies; * systolic blood pressure less then 90 mmHg with hypotensive events requiring therapies for those patients, which predialysis systolic blood pressure value was 100 mmHg.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary outcome measure is to evaluate the relative efficiency of each factor (AFB in the bath and blood volume control) to reach this result.
3 months
Study Arms (2)
AFB stand alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are switched in AFB treatment, without blood volume control.
BD and BVC
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are switched into bicarbonate dialysis with Blood Volume Control
Interventions
Some patients are randomized into the AFB, the others into the BD and BVC
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- End stage renal disease patients
- Patients affected by diabetic nephropathy with insulin therapy, for, at least, 6 months
- Patients with renal replacement therapy with haemodialysis three time a week, for, at least, 6 months.
- Age between 18 and 85 years
You may not qualify if:
- Patients affected by neoplasm and/or mental illness
- Patients with residual diuresis \> 500 ml/die;
- Patients in single needle bicarbonate dialysis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Hospital "Santa Maria della Scaletta"
Imola, Bologna, Italy
Hospital "Nuovo Ronco"
Gussago, Brescia, Italy
Hospital "Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi"
Bologna, Italy
Hospital "Spedali Civili"
Brescia, Italy
Hospital "Degli Infermi"
Rimini, Italy
Related Publications (4)
Movilli E, Camerini C, Zein H, D'Avolio G, Sandrini M, Strada A, Maiorca R. A prospective comparison of bicarbonate dialysis, hemodiafiltration, and acetate-free biofiltration in the elderly. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Apr;27(4):541-7. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90165-1.
PMID: 8678065BACKGROUNDVerzetti G, Navino C, Bolzani R, Galli G, Panzetta G. Acetate-free biofiltration versus bicarbonate haemodialysis in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy: a cross-over multicentric study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998 Apr;13(4):955-61. doi: 10.1093/ndt/13.4.955.
PMID: 9568857BACKGROUNDSantoro A, Mancini E, Basile C, Amoroso L, Di Giulio S, Usberti M, Colasanti G, Verzetti G, Rocco A, Imbasciati E, Panzetta G, Bolzani R, Grandi F, Polacchini M. Blood volume controlled hemodialysis in hypotension-prone patients: a randomized, multicenter controlled trial. Kidney Int. 2002 Sep;62(3):1034-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00511.x.
PMID: 12164888BACKGROUNDRonco C, Brendolan A, Milan M, Rodeghiero MP, Zanella M, La Greca G. Impact of biofeedback-induced cardiovascular stability on hemodialysis tolerance and efficiency. Kidney Int. 2000 Aug;58(2):800-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00229.x.
PMID: 10916105BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Giovanni Cancarini, MD
Università of Brescia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2010
First Posted
April 2, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
March 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2010
Last Updated
April 2, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-03