Left Atrial Ablation With Permanent Pacemaker or ImplanTable Loop Recorder Follow-UP
LAAPITUP
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is 3 fold:-
- 1.To compare the efficacy and complication rates of 2 widely used methods, conventional irrigation tip ablation catheter (LASSO) and Ablation Frontiers ablation technology, of AF ablation for PAF.
- 2.To evaluate the Reveal XT ILR as a long term accurate AF monitoring device as compared to the 'gold standard' DDD pacemaker Holter.
- 3.To accurately evaluate, by continuous rhythm monitoring for 1 year, the efficacy of AF ablation therapy for PAF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2012
CompletedMarch 30, 2010
March 1, 2010
2 years
March 29, 2010
March 29, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
AF Burden
AF Burden post left atrial ablation is defined as the sum of the duration of all atrial tachyarrhythmias expressed as a percentage of the total observation period as assessed by PM Holters.
12 Months
AF Burden
Comparison of AF burden post PVI ablation using a conventional irrigation tip catheter with LASSO guidance (or equivalent) versus Ablation Frontiers Technology using the PVAC, MASC and TVAC catheters via standard trans-septal techniques.
12 months
AF Burden detected
To evaluate the Reveal XT ILR as a long term accurate AF monitoring device as compared to the 'gold standard' DDD pacemaker Holter.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Arrhythmia frequency - symptomatic or asymptomatic.
12 months
Time to first episode of AF
12 months
Average AF duration
12 months
Time to persistent AF.
12 months
Average SR duration.
12 months
Study Arms (4)
Ablation Frontiers Ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will undergo AF ablation using Ablation Frontiers Technology.
LASSO ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will undergo atrial fibrillation ablation with traditional LASSO technology
Reveal XT monitoring
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will be monitored pre and post ablation using a Reveal XT implantable loop recorder.
Permanent Pacemaker - dual chamber
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will be monitored pre and post ablation with a dual chamber permanent pacemaker
Interventions
AF Ablation with Ablation Frontiers Technology - PVAC, TVAC and MASC.
This group will be monitored with a dual chamber pacemaker with advanced AF monitoring capabilities.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient aged 16-80 years old.
- Symptomatic PAF with AF episodes self terminating after at least 30 seconds but not longer than 24 hours. Preference is given to patients with AF episodes lasting no longer than 4 hours.
- PAF should have failed at least one drug therapy medical therapy.
- Patients must give written informed consent form prior to participating in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is suffering with unstable angina in last 1 week.
- Patient has had a myocardial infarction within last 2 months.
- Patient is expecting or has had major cardiac surgery within last 2 months.
- Patient is participating in a conflicting study.
- Patient is mentally incapacitated and cannot consent or comply with follow-up.
- Patient has NYHA class III/ IV heart failure.
- Patients with severe valvular or ventricular dysfunction.
- Pregnancy.
- Patient suffers with other cardiac rhythm disorders.
- Recent coronary artery intervention or other factors suggesting clinical instability (ECG, clinical or laboratory findings)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eastbourne District General Hospital
Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 2UD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Podd SJ, Sulke AN, Sugihara C, Furniss SS. Phased multipolar radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation is as effective and safe as conventional irrigated point-to-point ablation. A prospective randomised 1-year implantable cardiac monitoring device follow-up trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Dec;44(3):257-64. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0042-0. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
PMID: 26310300DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen S Furniss, FRCP, MD
East Sussex NHS Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AN Sulke, FRCP, MD
East Sussex NHS Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2010
First Posted
March 30, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
November 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 30, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-03