A Screening Strategy for Q Fever Among Pregnant Women
Cost-effectiveness of a Screening Strategy for Q Fever Among Pregnant Women in Risk Areas: a Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
4,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Q fever in the Netherlands is becoming more common. A Q fever infection is a serious threat to certain risk groups,including pregnant women. Pregnant women are more often than the general population asymptomatic. Studies from France show that an infection with Coxiella burnetii may cause obstetric complications including spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth retardation and oligohydramnios. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a multidisciplinary screening program, whereby pregnant women in first line healthcare in high-risk areas for Q fever are screened with a single blood sample during pregnancy. If found positive for Q fever, advise for antibiotic treatment will follow as part of regular healthcare. Treatment is therefore not part of the study protocol. The results of this study will give more insights in the risks of asymptomatic Q fever in pregnancy and the benefits and harms of a screening strategy during pregnancy. This study will be used to give an evidence based advice to the Dutch minister of health on screening for Q fever in pregnancy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedJuly 1, 2010
February 1, 2010
11 months
March 29, 2010
June 30, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
obstetric or maternal complications in Q fever positive women
Presence of any obstetric or maternal complication after the first trimester of pregnancy, i.e. spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal death, termination of pregnancy, oligohydramnios, premature delivery or intrauterine growth retardation. Spontaneous abortion is defined as spontaneous expulsion of the embryo or the fetus before 16 weeks of gestation. Oligohydramnios is defined as the ultrasonic measurement with an amniotic index \<=5 cm. IUGR is defined as a fetal birth weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age, according to the national reference curves.
obstetric complications till delivery, maternal till one month post partum
Secondary Outcomes (4)
course of infection in pregnant women
till one month post partum
the accuracy of the diagnostic tests used for screening
around 20 weeks of gestation
placentitis
one month post partum
costs
till one month post partum
Study Arms (2)
intervention
EXPERIMENTALScreening for Q-fever during pregnancy
control
NO INTERVENTIONNo screening for Q-fever during pregnancy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- being pregnant under first line healthcare
- being eighteen years or older
- having signed an informed consent form
- having a estimated date of delivery between June 1th 2010 en December 31th 2010
You may not qualify if:
- unable to fulfill study procedures
- absence of informed consent
- have been tested positive for Q fever prior to pregnancy
- unable to understand Dutch
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9700 RB, Netherlands
Related Publications (21)
Hartzell JD, Wood-Morris RN, Martinez LJ, Trotta RF. Q fever: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 May;83(5):574-9. doi: 10.4065/83.5.574.
PMID: 18452690BACKGROUNDCarcopino X, Raoult D, Bretelle F, Boubli L, Stein A. Managing Q fever during pregnancy: the benefits of long-term cotrimoxazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Sep 1;45(5):548-55. doi: 10.1086/520661. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
PMID: 17682987BACKGROUNDParker NR, Barralet JH, Bell AM. Q fever. Lancet. 2006 Feb 25;367(9511):679-88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68266-4.
PMID: 16503466BACKGROUNDSchimmer B, Morroy G, Dijkstra F, Schneeberger PM, Weers-Pothoff G, Timen A, Wijkmans C, van der Hoek W. Large ongoing Q fever outbreak in the south of The Netherlands, 2008. Euro Surveill. 2008 Jul 31;13(31):18939. No abstract available.
PMID: 18761906BACKGROUNDKaragiannis I, Morroy G, Rietveld A, Horrevorts AM, Hamans M, Francken P, Schimmer B. Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands: a preliminary report. Euro Surveill. 2007 Aug 9;12(8):E070809.2. doi: 10.2807/esw.12.32.03247-en. No abstract available.
PMID: 17868551BACKGROUNDVan Steenbergen JE, Morroy G, Groot CA, Ruikes FG, Marcelis JH, Speelman P. [An outbreak of Q fever in The Netherlands--possible link to goats]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Sep 8;151(36):1998-2003. Dutch.
PMID: 17953175BACKGROUNDJover-Diaz F, Robert-Gates J, Andreu-Gimenez L, Merino-Sanchez J. Q fever during pregnancy: an emerging cause of prematurity and abortion. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2001;9(1):47-9. doi: 10.1155/S1064744901000084.
PMID: 11368259BACKGROUNDLin JM, Brimmer DJ, Maloney EM, Nyarko E, Belue R, Reeves WC. Further validation of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in a US adult population sample. Popul Health Metr. 2009 Dec 15;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-7-18.
PMID: 20003524BACKGROUNDMaurin M, Raoult D. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Oct;12(4):518-53. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.4.518.
PMID: 10515901BACKGROUNDLangley JM, Marrie TJ, Leblanc JC, Almudevar A, Resch L, Raoult D. Coxiella burnetii seropositivity in parturient women is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):228-32. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.448.
PMID: 12861167BACKGROUNDRaoult D, Fenollar F, Stein A. Q fever during pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Mar 25;162(6):701-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.6.701.
PMID: 11911725BACKGROUNDAdvice Dutch Health Council, http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/nl/adviezen/briefadviesbijeenkomst- over-q-koorts-nederland
BACKGROUNDVaidya VM, Malik SV, Kaur S, Kumar S, Barbuddhe SB. Comparison of PCR, immunofluorescence assay, and pathogen isolation for diagnosis of q fever in humans with spontaneous abortions. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jun;46(6):2038-44. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01874-07. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
PMID: 18448698BACKGROUNDWagner-Wiening C, Brockmann S, Kimmig P. Serological diagnosis and follow-up of asymptomatic and acute Q fever infections. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006 May;296 Suppl 40:294-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.045. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
PMID: 16524773BACKGROUNDGikas A, Kofteridis DP, Manios A, Pediaditis J, Tselentis Y. Newer macrolides as empiric treatment for acute Q fever infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Dec;45(12):3644-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3644-3646.2001.
PMID: 11709360BACKGROUNDStein A, Raoult D. Q fever during pregnancy: a public health problem in southern France. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Sep;27(3):592-6. doi: 10.1086/514698.
PMID: 9770161BACKGROUNDMcCaughey C, McKenna J, McKenna C, Coyle PV, O'Neill HJ, Wyatt DE, Smyth B, Murray LJ. Human seroprevalence to Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) in Northern Ireland. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008 May;55(4):189-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01109.x.
PMID: 18387140BACKGROUNDMeekelenkamp JCE, Notermans DW, Rietveld A, Marcelis JH, Schimmer B, Reimerink JHJ, Vollebergh JHA, Wijkmans CJ, Leenders ACAP. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in pregnant women in the province of Noord-Brabant in 2007. Infectieziekten Bulletin, 20: 57-61 [in Dutch].
BACKGROUNDDupont HT, Thirion X, Raoult D. Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1994 Mar;1(2):189-96. doi: 10.1128/cdli.1.2.189-196.1994.
PMID: 7496944BACKGROUNDMunster JM, Leenders AC, Hamilton CJ, Meekelenkamp JC, Schneeberger PM, van der Hoek W, Rietveld A, de Vries E, Stolk RP, Aarnoudse JG, Hak E. Routine screening for Coxiella burnetii infection during pregnancy: a clustered randomised controlled trial during an outbreak, the Netherlands, 2010. Euro Surveill. 2013 Jun 13;18(24):20504.
PMID: 23787163DERIVEDMunster JM, Leenders AC, van der Hoek W, Schneeberger PM, Rietveld A, Riphagen-Dalhuisen J, Stolk RP, Hamilton CJ, de Vries E, Meekelenkamp J, Lo-Ten-Foe JR, Timmer A, De Jong-van den Berg LT, Aarnoudse JG, Hak E. Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2010 Nov 1;10:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-10-32.
PMID: 21040534DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eelko Hak, Dr.
University Medical Center Groningen
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Janna Munster, MD, MSc
University Medical Center Groningen
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wim van der Hoek, Drs.
Center for Infectious Disease Control
- STUDY CHAIR
Ronald Stolk, Prof. dr.
University Medical Center Groningen
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan Aarnoudse, Prof. dr.
University Medical Center Groningen
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sander Leenders, Dr.
Jeroen Bosch Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bert Timmer, Dr.
University Medical Center Groningen
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2010
First Posted
March 30, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 1, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-02