Study Stopped
Pharmaceutical company did not decide to renew contract
Secretin-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (S-MRI) for Pancreatic Cancer Detection
MRI With Secretin Enhancement to Increase Conspicuity of Pancreatic Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the utility of secretin-enhanced MRI (S-MRI) in detecting and measuring pancreatic lesions in patients with known adenocarcinoma or Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) lesions. The hypothesis is that S-MRI is superior to MRI without secretin enhancement (N-MRI) in increasing tumor conspicuity, allowing for improved identification and more accurate measurement of lesions or precursor lesions in the pancreas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Apr 2010
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedJune 10, 2016
June 1, 2016
2.9 years
March 25, 2010
June 8, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in lesion conspicuity between S-MRI and N-MRI
The primary outcome is whether S-MRI allows for better tumor detection secondary to anticipated increased conspicuity of tumor due to secretin's effect on increasing blood flow to the normal pancreas as compared to N-MRI. Determining S-MRI's efficacy versus that of N-MRI will be carried out by comparing tumor conspicuity measurements in S-MRI and N-MRI groups. Tumor conspicuity will be measured by calculating the contrast to noise ratio, placing region of interest (ROI) on tumor and adjacent tissue and dividing by image noise.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Concordance of tumor measurements between S-MRI images and tumor specimens post-resection vs. concordance of tumor measurements between N-MRI and tumor specimens post-resection
45 days
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALFifteen subjects will be randomly selected to undergo S-MRI prior to surgery. These subjects would receive Secretin, administered by IV bolus injection over 1 minute followed by a 30 second saline flush.
Controls
NO INTERVENTIONFifteen subjects will be selected as controls, undergoing MRI without secretin-enhancement and matched for age, sex, race and tumor-type.
Interventions
Subjects will each undergo an S-MRI evaluation, at a dose of 0.2 ucg/kg per exam. Secretin will be administered by IV bolus injection over 1 minute followed by a 30 second saline flush. The maximum dose of secretin will be 18.5 ucg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Histologically confirmed IPMN/pancreatic adenocarcinoma by biopsy or fine needle or suspected IPMN/pancreatic adenocarcinoma based on imaging
- Scheduled for surgical resection
- Willingness to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Any contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including but not limited to implanted metal devices (e.g. pacemaker, berry aneurysm clips, neural stimulator or cochlear implants)
- Unresectable tumor
- Other abdominal neoplasm in addition to neoplasm in pancreas
- Contraindication to surgery, including but not limited to recent myocardial infarction (MI) (within 6 weeks) or poor pulmonary function
- History of sensitivity to secretin
- Pregnancy
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (as per Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation)
- Unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Elizabeth Hechtlead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth Hecht, MD
Columbia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Clinical Radiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2010
First Posted
March 29, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 10, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share