NCT01094574

Brief Summary

Previous studies have shown that the beta-adrenergic system plays a role in processing pain and the expression of hyperalgesia. Recent studies have investigated the analgesic effects, and potential anti-hyperalgesic effects (using a model of opioid induced (OIH) hyperalgesia) of propranolol, a beta adrenergic antagonist. We plan to further investigate the analgesic effects, and the potential anti inflammatory effects, of propranolol and compare those effects to alfentanil, an opioid of known effect, and placebo

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 2, 2010

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2010

Completed
6.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 24, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 2, 2010

Results QC Date

June 28, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 4, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change From Baseline in Heat Pain Threshold During Infusion in Non-Inflamed Skin

    Degrees Centigrade Heat pain was induced with a thermal sensory analyzer (TSA-II, Medoc Advanced Medical Systems, Durham, North Carolina). A thermode was placed in contact with skin on the upper thigh. Starting at a comfortable temperature, the thermode temperature was increased at a measured rate. Study participants pushed a button of a hand-held device at the onset of pain at which point the thermode immediately reduced the temperature. Measurements for analgesia were taken at the sites of non-injured skin. Change form baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline values from the average values obtained 1 and 2 hours after starting the drug infusion.

    Participants underwent the pain testing measures at baseline and at 1 and 2 hours after startingthe drug infusion.

  • Change From Baseline in Heat Pain Threshold During Infusion in Inflamed Skin

    Degrees Centigrade Heat pain was induced with a thermal sensory analyzer (TSA-II, Medoc Advanced Medical Systems, Durham, North Carolina). A thermode was placed in contact with skin on the upper thigh. Starting at a comfortable temperature, the thermode temperature was increased at a measured rate. Study participants pushed a button of a hand-held device at the onset of pain at which point the thermode immediately reduced the temperature. Measurements for anti-hyperalgesia were taken at the sites of tissue injury. Change form baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline values from the average values obtained 1 and 2 hours after starting the drug infusion.

    Participants underwent the pain testing measures at baseline and at 1 and 2 hours after startingthe drug infusion.

  • Change From Baseline in Mechanical Pain Threshold During Infusion in Non-Inflamed Skin

    A metal rod of 0.24 mm diameter mounted onto 10 different weights (1.0, 2.0, 4.1, 8.2,16.3, 20, 32.7,49.0, 65.3, and 81.3g) will be placed perpendicularly onto the skin. Starting with the lightest probe, consecutively heavier probes will be used until a subject reports pain. Subsequently, the same or the next lighter probe will be used if pain is reported for the preceding stimulus, or the same or the next heavier probe will be used if no pain is reported for the preceding stimulus.The procedure will be repeated until seven perceptional changes (painful/non-painful) are registered. Measurements for analgesia were taken at the sites of non-injured skin. Change form baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline values from the average values obtained 1 and 2 hours after starting the drug infusion.

    Participants underwent the pain testing measures at baseline and at 1 and 2 hours after startingthe drug infusion.

  • Change From Baseline in Mechanical Pain Threshold During Infusion in Inflamed Skin

    A metal rod of 0.24 mm diameter mounted onto 10 different weights (1.0, 2.0, 4.1, 8.2,16.3, 20, 32.7,49.0, 65.3, and 81.3g) will be placed perpendicularly onto the skin. Starting with the lightest probe, consecutively heavier probes will be used until a subject reports pain. Subsequently, the same or the next lighter probe will be used if pain is reported for the preceding stimulus, or the same or the next heavier probe will be used if no pain is reported for the preceding stimulus.The procedure will be repeated until seven perceptional changes (painful/non-painful) are registered. Measurements for anti-hyperalgesia were taken at the sites of tissue injury. Change form baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline values from the average values obtained 1 and 2 hours after starting the drug infusion.

    Participants underwent the pain testing measures at baseline and at 1 and 2 hours after startingthe drug infusion.

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • TNFα (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion

    Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.

  • IL-1β (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion

    Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.

  • IL-2 (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion

    Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.

  • IL-6 (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion

    Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.

  • GMCSF (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion

    Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Alfentanil

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Experimental inflammation, and tissue injury sites were created, an infusion of alfentanil 100ng/ml was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump, and data were collected to measure inflammation, pain response, and cytokine levels locally.

Drug: Alfentanil

Propranolol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Experimental inflammation and tissue injury sites were created, an infusion of propranolol 30ng/ml was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump, and data were collected to measure inflammation, pain response, and cytokine levels locally.

Drug: Propranolol

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Experimental inflammation and tissue injury sites were created, an infusion of normal saline was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump, and data were collected to measure inflammation, pain response, and cytokine levels locally.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

An infusion of alfentanil 100ng/ml was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump.

Also known as: No other name
Alfentanil

An infusion of propranolol 30ng/ml was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump.

Also known as: No other name
Propranolol

An infusion of normal saline was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump to mimic the 2 drug arms,

Also known as: Normal Saline
Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stanford University School of Medicine

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

AlfentanilPropranololSaline Solution

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FentanylPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPhenoxypropanolaminesPropanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsPropanolsAminesNaphthalenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Results Point of Contact

Title
Martin Angst, MD, Professor, Dept. of Anesthesia, Stanford SOM
Organization
Stanford School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Martin S Angst

    Stanford University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Anesthesia

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2010

First Posted

March 29, 2010

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

June 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2010

Last Updated

February 24, 2017

Results First Posted

February 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared.

Locations