Evaluation of Propranolol's Effect on Pain and Inflammation.
Investigation of Analgesic and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Beta-adrenergic Antagonist Propranolol
2 other identifiers
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous studies have shown that the beta-adrenergic system plays a role in processing pain and the expression of hyperalgesia. Recent studies have investigated the analgesic effects, and potential anti-hyperalgesic effects (using a model of opioid induced (OIH) hyperalgesia) of propranolol, a beta adrenergic antagonist. We plan to further investigate the analgesic effects, and the potential anti inflammatory effects, of propranolol and compare those effects to alfentanil, an opioid of known effect, and placebo
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 24, 2017
CompletedFebruary 24, 2017
January 1, 2017
5 months
March 2, 2010
June 28, 2016
January 4, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Heat Pain Threshold During Infusion in Non-Inflamed Skin
Degrees Centigrade Heat pain was induced with a thermal sensory analyzer (TSA-II, Medoc Advanced Medical Systems, Durham, North Carolina). A thermode was placed in contact with skin on the upper thigh. Starting at a comfortable temperature, the thermode temperature was increased at a measured rate. Study participants pushed a button of a hand-held device at the onset of pain at which point the thermode immediately reduced the temperature. Measurements for analgesia were taken at the sites of non-injured skin. Change form baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline values from the average values obtained 1 and 2 hours after starting the drug infusion.
Participants underwent the pain testing measures at baseline and at 1 and 2 hours after startingthe drug infusion.
Change From Baseline in Heat Pain Threshold During Infusion in Inflamed Skin
Degrees Centigrade Heat pain was induced with a thermal sensory analyzer (TSA-II, Medoc Advanced Medical Systems, Durham, North Carolina). A thermode was placed in contact with skin on the upper thigh. Starting at a comfortable temperature, the thermode temperature was increased at a measured rate. Study participants pushed a button of a hand-held device at the onset of pain at which point the thermode immediately reduced the temperature. Measurements for anti-hyperalgesia were taken at the sites of tissue injury. Change form baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline values from the average values obtained 1 and 2 hours after starting the drug infusion.
Participants underwent the pain testing measures at baseline and at 1 and 2 hours after startingthe drug infusion.
Change From Baseline in Mechanical Pain Threshold During Infusion in Non-Inflamed Skin
A metal rod of 0.24 mm diameter mounted onto 10 different weights (1.0, 2.0, 4.1, 8.2,16.3, 20, 32.7,49.0, 65.3, and 81.3g) will be placed perpendicularly onto the skin. Starting with the lightest probe, consecutively heavier probes will be used until a subject reports pain. Subsequently, the same or the next lighter probe will be used if pain is reported for the preceding stimulus, or the same or the next heavier probe will be used if no pain is reported for the preceding stimulus.The procedure will be repeated until seven perceptional changes (painful/non-painful) are registered. Measurements for analgesia were taken at the sites of non-injured skin. Change form baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline values from the average values obtained 1 and 2 hours after starting the drug infusion.
Participants underwent the pain testing measures at baseline and at 1 and 2 hours after startingthe drug infusion.
Change From Baseline in Mechanical Pain Threshold During Infusion in Inflamed Skin
A metal rod of 0.24 mm diameter mounted onto 10 different weights (1.0, 2.0, 4.1, 8.2,16.3, 20, 32.7,49.0, 65.3, and 81.3g) will be placed perpendicularly onto the skin. Starting with the lightest probe, consecutively heavier probes will be used until a subject reports pain. Subsequently, the same or the next lighter probe will be used if pain is reported for the preceding stimulus, or the same or the next heavier probe will be used if no pain is reported for the preceding stimulus.The procedure will be repeated until seven perceptional changes (painful/non-painful) are registered. Measurements for anti-hyperalgesia were taken at the sites of tissue injury. Change form baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline values from the average values obtained 1 and 2 hours after starting the drug infusion.
Participants underwent the pain testing measures at baseline and at 1 and 2 hours after startingthe drug infusion.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
TNFα (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion
Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.
IL-1β (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion
Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.
IL-2 (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion
Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.
IL-6 (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion
Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.
GMCSF (ng/mL) Change From Baseline During Infusion
Tissue samples were collected at baseline, and 2 and 3 hours after starting the drug infusion.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Alfentanil
ACTIVE COMPARATORExperimental inflammation, and tissue injury sites were created, an infusion of alfentanil 100ng/ml was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump, and data were collected to measure inflammation, pain response, and cytokine levels locally.
Propranolol
ACTIVE COMPARATORExperimental inflammation and tissue injury sites were created, an infusion of propranolol 30ng/ml was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump, and data were collected to measure inflammation, pain response, and cytokine levels locally.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORExperimental inflammation and tissue injury sites were created, an infusion of normal saline was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump, and data were collected to measure inflammation, pain response, and cytokine levels locally.
Interventions
An infusion of alfentanil 100ng/ml was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump.
An infusion of propranolol 30ng/ml was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump.
An infusion of normal saline was administered over 3 hours using a programmable infusion pump to mimic the 2 drug arms,
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Martin Angstlead
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Martin Angst, MD, Professor, Dept. of Anesthesia, Stanford SOM
- Organization
- Stanford School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin S Angst
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2010
First Posted
March 29, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 24, 2017
Results First Posted
February 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared.