A Comparative Study Minisling Versus Transobturator (TOT)Sling
sui
Randomised Trial of Ophira™ Minisling System and Unitape™ for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women
1 other identifier
interventional
145
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A study to compare efficacy in surgical treatment for SUI (Stress Urinary Incontinence), tot with minisling.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedJune 21, 2017
June 1, 2017
3.5 years
March 24, 2010
June 19, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
to assess efficacy between tot with minisling in cure in women with stress urinary incontinence
to assess efficacy and safety of minisling and transobturator sling in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence
one year
Study Arms (2)
Mini-sling
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe minisling Ophira™ is a new intervention therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence. It is made of polypropylene monofilament mesh, held between two self-anchoring polypropylene columns in a fishbone design connected to two delivering needles.
Transobturator
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransobturator sling Unitape™ is an outside-in approach therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence
Interventions
The minisling is a new intervention therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence. It is made of polypropylene monofilament mesh, held between two self-anchoring polypropylene columns in a fishbone design connected to two delivering needles.
Transobturator sling Unitape™ is an outside-in approach therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- clinical and urodynamic diagnosis of SUI in patients between 18 and 90 years
You may not qualify if:
- postvoid residual urine volume more than 100 ml, coagulation disorders, current urinary tract infection, sequelae of previous radiation therapy of the pelvis, anticoagulant therapy, vulvovaginitis, and anesthesia contraindication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Federal University of São Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil
Related Publications (2)
De Ridder D, Berkers J, Deprest J, Verguts J, Ost D, Hamid D, Van der Aa F. Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jul;21(7):773-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1127-z. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
PMID: 20204323RESULTDjehdian LM, Araujo MP, Takano CC, Del-Roy CA, Sartori MGF, Girao MJBC, Castro RA. Transobturator sling compared with single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):553-561. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000148.
PMID: 24499750DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ana LG Pascom, Pg
Federal University of São Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participants were randomly allocated to a single-incision mini-sling or a transobturator midurethral tape by a simple randomization procedure using a random number generator computer program. Randomization was performed at the moment of inclusion by a nurse blinded to women's histories. Group assign- ment was concealed in consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes that were opened in the operating room just before the procedure.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2010
First Posted
March 26, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 21, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06