Mediators and Moderators of Exercise Behavior Change
COSTRIDE
2 other identifiers
interventional
238
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rates of cancer and cardiovascular disease have shown very little improvement over the past two decades, and the incidence of Type II diabetes mellitus is increasing at an alarming rate. Recent reports estimate that approximately 30% of total cancer deaths are related to poor exercise and nutrition, and other reports have suggested that, when taking into consideration both cardiovascular disease and cancer, inactivity contributes to as many as 250,000 premature deaths per year (Booth et al., 2002). Despite the benefit of regular physical activity in the prevention of cancer and other debilitating illnesses, 75% of the U.S. population do not get the recommended amount of physical activity as defined by 30 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity 5 or more days per week (CDC, 2001), and 40% of the population is completely sedentary (USDHHS, 19960. The objective of the proposed research is to understand the mediators and moderators of a well-tested individually tailored, print-based intervention to increase exercise behavior among sedentary adults. Using a randomized, controlled intervention ton trial, the proposed study will address three primary and one secondary hypotheses: 1) A previously tested and validated exercise promotion intervention (c.f., Marcus et al., 1998) is successful at helping sedentary individuals initiate and maintain a moderate intensity physical activity regimen, as compared to a health and wellness control intervention, 2) Increases in positive attitudes, perceived normative support, self-efficacy, and intentions to exercise will mediate the effectiveness of the intervention, 3) That increased positive mood, and better temperature, stress, and lactate regulation immediately after exercise challenge (assessed in the laboratory) will moderate the effectiveness of the intervention, and 4) Secondarily, we will test whether gender, race/ethnicity, and two recently suggested genetic factors (BDNF and OPRM1) moderate the effectiveness of the intervention. The rigorous assessment of how and for whom an exercise promotion intervention is effective will provide information for future development of intervention strategies and content, as well as allow the targeting of exercise content to individuals for whom it is most likely to be effective.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2010
CompletedJuly 11, 2023
July 1, 2023
4.9 years
March 22, 2010
July 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self-reported physical activity
After being randomly assigned to the exercise or health-and-wellness conditions, participants were followed up every three months for one year at which times they reported their current physical activity.
3,6,9,and 12 months post baseline
Study Arms (2)
Exercise intervention (STRIDE)
EXPERIMENTALHealth and Wellness Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All participants were required to exercise less than 90 minutes per week on average, have a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 37.5, be physically capable of engaging in moderate-intensity physical activity, have a regular menstrual cycle (if female), be willing to be randomly chosen for one of the two interventions, and give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals were excluded if they smoked cigarettes, were on a restricted diet, taking psychotropic medications, receiving treatment for any psychiatric disorder, diabetic, had a history of cardiovascular or respiratory disease, had the flu or illness in the previous month, or were pregnant (if female).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of New Mexicolead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Related Publications (3)
Bryan AD, Magnan RE, Hooper AE, Ciccolo JT, Marcus B, Hutchison KE. Colorado stride (COSTRIDE): testing genetic and physiological moderators of response to an intervention to increase physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Dec 21;10:139. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-139.
PMID: 24359456DERIVEDMagnan RE, Kwan BM, Bryan AD. Effects of current physical activity on affective response to exercise: physical and social-cognitive mechanisms. Psychol Health. 2013;28(4):418-33. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2012.733704. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
PMID: 23088712DERIVEDMagnan RE, Kwan BM, Ciccolo JT, Gurney B, Mermier CM, Bryan AD. Aerobic capacity testing with inactive individuals: the role of subjective experience. J Phys Act Health. 2013 Feb;10(2):271-9. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.2.271. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
PMID: 22398432DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2010
First Posted
March 24, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2004
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07